-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 241
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
PAASTA-17941: add topology spread constraints option #3641
Merged
gmdfalk
merged 17 commits into
master
from
u/gfalk/PAASTA-17941-add_topology_spread_constraints_config
Jul 5, 2023
Merged
PAASTA-17941: add topology spread constraints option #3641
gmdfalk
merged 17 commits into
master
from
u/gfalk/PAASTA-17941-add_topology_spread_constraints_config
Jul 5, 2023
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Signed-off-by: Max Falk <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Max Falk <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Max Falk <[email protected]>
ilkinmammadzada
approved these changes
Jul 3, 2023
Signed-off-by: Max Falk <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Max Falk <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Max Falk <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Max Falk <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Max Falk <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Max Falk <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Max Falk <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Max Falk <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Max Falk <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Max Falk <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Max Falk <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Max Falk <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Max Falk <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Max Falk <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Ticket: PAASTA-17941
Problem
On EKS, we cannot configure the default Kubernetes scheduler with pod topology constraints.
But to support the Karpenter migration and to be able to tune our spread of Pods across zones and nodes, we want to be able to configure cluster wide topology constraints via PaaSTA.
Solution
Add a
topology_spread_constraints
option to the PaaSTA system config that allows defining rules to spread Pods across topologies per cluster.For example to try spreading Pods evenly across both nodes and availability zones, we'd set:
This can be configured once per cluster (or globally) and will be added to every Pod Spec template (i.e. both Deployments and StatefulSets), using
paasta.yelp.com/service
andpaasta.yelp.com/instance
as label selectors.Future Work
There is a potentially conflicting interaction of this new configuration option with
deploy_whitelist
anddeploy_blacklist
because those use node affinities and could constrain a deployment to one specific habitat/AZ while the topology spread constraint might be configured to spread Pods across multiple AZs. Ifwhen_unsatisfiable: "DoNotSchedule"
is set, this would lead to Pods being unable to get scheduled.For now, this will be handled by not defining any default spread constraints and only using
ScheduleAnyway
but we'll probably pose a follow-up PR to change the implementation of the whitelist/blacklist options from node affinities (which are somewhat expensive anyway) to topology spread constraints and give priority to the whitelist/blacklist options, if defined.Signed-off-by: Max Falk [email protected]