Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

peer review: <Promish Kandel Team 22> FMEA components shouldn't have general #124

Open
Tracked by #113
PromishKandel opened this issue Oct 27, 2024 · 0 comments
Open
Tracked by #113
Labels
review To be used with different parties for review purposes

Comments

@PromishKandel
Copy link

artifact under review. Hazard Analysis.md

team number (for the team doing the review). team 22 TeleHealth Insights

description of issue.

The FMEA components should be similar to the ones in the section 3 which I see you did but having general has a component is very vague and defeats the purpose of looking at the system closer. For Overall system unresponsive, maybe break it up into unresponsive front-end and back-end and the issues that you might have with both. I.e a unresponsive front-end might freeze the a website but you can still see the website. Where as a unresponsive backend would allow user to move through the website but certain features might not load.

@PromishKandel PromishKandel added the review To be used with different parties for review purposes label Oct 27, 2024
@PromishKandel PromishKandel changed the title peer review: <Promish Kandel> FMEA components shouldn't have general peer review: <Promish Kandel Team 22> FMEA components shouldn't have general Oct 31, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
review To be used with different parties for review purposes
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant