peer review: <Promish Kandel Team 22> Missing a section on what is a defined as a critcal path.

[PromishKandel]

artifact under review.

Verification and Validation Plan

team number (for the team doing the review).

Team 22

description of issue.

In section 3.6.5, under "Automate Testing Requirements," you've split code coverage requirements into three parts: Morph, Asteraceae, and Critical paths. I suggest adding a clear definition of what qualifies as a "critical path" since this can vary based on the software's purpose. For example, is it code that accesses memory or code that passes essential information through an API?

To make this clearer and improve your validation plan, consider adding a section 3.6.3 titled "Critical Paths," where you define these criteria. This will help avoid any confusion about what needs to be tested as a critical path.