-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Create Document for Custom User Model #48
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This fine - a couple of extra paragraph to give a little more information about you have been doing with the custom user model would, I think, help clarify things.
I have added suggestions in line.
|
||
## Decision | ||
|
||
We will use a custom User model instead of using Django built-in User model. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
issue: Can we also state here that the custom model will be based on the built in one and provide all the same features?
49d4bfb
to
b933d37
Compare
change and evolve that model later one. Something this is a lot more difficult should | ||
we stick with the built in one. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
typo:
change and evolve that model later one. Something this is a lot more difficult should | |
we stick with the built in one. | |
change and evolve that model later one. Something that is a lot more difficult should | |
we stick with the built in one. |
Sorry, this one is my fault.
b933d37
to
7a4183c
Compare
Created ADR for the custom User model introduced by #47