The classic builder cache system is prone to cache poisoning if the image is built FROM scratch
.
Also, changes to some instructions (most important being HEALTHCHECK
and ONBUILD
) would not cause a cache miss.
An attacker with the knowledge of the Dockerfile someone is using could poison their cache by making them pull a specially crafted image that would be considered as a valid cache candidate for some build steps.
For example, an attacker could create an image that is considered as a valid cache candidate for:
FROM scratch
MAINTAINER Pawel
when in fact the malicious image used as a cache would be an image built from a different Dockerfile.
In the second case, the attacker could for example substitute a different HEALTCHECK
command.
Impact
23.0+ users are only affected if they explicitly opted out of Buildkit (DOCKER_BUILDKIT=0
environment variable) or are using the /build
API endpoint (which uses the classic builder by default).
All users on versions older than 23.0 could be impacted. An example could be a CI with a shared cache, or just a regular Docker user pulling a malicious image due to misspelling/typosquatting.
Image build API endpoint (/build
) and ImageBuild
function from github.com/docker/docker/client
is also affected as it the uses classic builder by default.
Patches
Patches are included in Moby releases:
Workarounds
- Use
--no-cache
or use Buildkit if possible (DOCKER_BUILDKIT=1
, it's default on 23.0+ assuming that the buildx plugin is installed).
- Use
Version = types.BuilderBuildKit
or NoCache = true
in ImageBuildOptions
for ImageBuild
call.
References
The classic builder cache system is prone to cache poisoning if the image is built
FROM scratch
.Also, changes to some instructions (most important being
HEALTHCHECK
andONBUILD
) would not cause a cache miss.An attacker with the knowledge of the Dockerfile someone is using could poison their cache by making them pull a specially crafted image that would be considered as a valid cache candidate for some build steps.
For example, an attacker could create an image that is considered as a valid cache candidate for:
when in fact the malicious image used as a cache would be an image built from a different Dockerfile.
In the second case, the attacker could for example substitute a different
HEALTCHECK
command.Impact
23.0+ users are only affected if they explicitly opted out of Buildkit (
DOCKER_BUILDKIT=0
environment variable) or are using the/build
API endpoint (which uses the classic builder by default).All users on versions older than 23.0 could be impacted. An example could be a CI with a shared cache, or just a regular Docker user pulling a malicious image due to misspelling/typosquatting.
Image build API endpoint (
/build
) andImageBuild
function fromgithub.com/docker/docker/client
is also affected as it the uses classic builder by default.Patches
Patches are included in Moby releases:
Workarounds
--no-cache
or use Buildkit if possible (DOCKER_BUILDKIT=1
, it's default on 23.0+ assuming that the buildx plugin is installed).Version = types.BuilderBuildKit
orNoCache = true
inImageBuildOptions
forImageBuild
call.References