Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: pnpm lock build inconsistency #21

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Feb 4, 2025
Merged

fix: pnpm lock build inconsistency #21

merged 3 commits into from
Feb 4, 2025

Conversation

manavbabber
Copy link
Collaborator

@manavbabber manavbabber commented Feb 4, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Introduced a new automated workflow to handle development builds and run tests with enhanced consistency. These improvements support a more efficient development process, ensuring that performance and stability are maintained across updates. Enhanced automation contributes to overall faster release cycles and significantly improved quality control for a better end-user experience.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 4, 2025

Walkthrough

A new GitHub Actions workflow file has been added to automate the development build process. This workflow is triggered on pushes and pull requests to the develop branch. It performs a series of steps including checking out the code, setting up Node.js (v18.17.0) and PNPM (v8), installing system dependencies, caching the PNPM store directory, installing project dependencies using PNPM with a frozen lockfile, and finally running the build. The workflow aims to streamline building and testing within a consistent Ubuntu environment.

Changes

File Change Summary
.github/workflows/development-build.yml Added new GitHub Actions workflow for development builds. The workflow checks out the repository, sets up Node.js and PNPM, installs system dependencies, caches PNPM store, installs dependencies using PNPM with --frozen-lockfile, and runs the build command when code is pushed or a pull request is opened on the develop branch.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant Dev as Developer
    participant GH as GitHub
    participant Workflow as Development Build Workflow
    participant Checkout as Checkout Action
    participant Node as Setup Node.js Action
    participant PNPM as PNPM Setup & Cache
    participant Build as Build Process

    Dev->>GH: Push/PR to "develop" branch
    GH->>Workflow: Trigger workflow
    Workflow->>Checkout: Check out repository
    Checkout->>Workflow: Source code provided
    Workflow->>Node: Setup Node.js v18.17.0
    Node->>Workflow: Node environment ready
    Workflow->>PNPM: Install PNPM v8, update package list, install dependencies, set STORE_PATH
    PNPM->>Workflow: PNPM configured and cache set up
    Workflow->>Build: Install dependencies (--frozen-lockfile) & run build
    Build->>Workflow: Build and test completed
Loading

Poem

I’m a hopping rabbit, code in my sight,
Skipping through workflows in the morning light.
Node and PNPM, a duet so sweet,
Dependencies lined up—a rhythmic beat.
Building with glee, my heart takes flight!
🥕✨

Tip

🌐 Web search-backed reviews and chat
  • We have enabled web search-based reviews and chat for all users. This feature allows CodeRabbit to access the latest documentation and information on the web.
  • You can disable this feature by setting web_search: false in the knowledge_base settings.
  • Please share any feedback in the Discord discussion.

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
.github/workflows/development-build.yml (1)

14-14: Remove trailing whitespaces.
YAML lint has flagged unnecessary trailing spaces on these lines. Removing them will help avoid lint errors and improve file readability.

A quick fix example for a flagged line might look like this:

Repeat similarly for lines 17, 22, 30, 31, and 44.

Also applies to: 17-17, 22-22, 30-30, 31-31, 44-44

🧰 Tools
🪛 YAMLlint (1.35.1)

[error] 14-14: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 6060f02 and 41ee9a9.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • pnpm-lock.yaml is excluded by !**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/development-build.yml (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)
.github/workflows/development-build.yml

37-37: the runner of "actions/cache@v3" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue

(action)

🪛 YAMLlint (1.35.1)
.github/workflows/development-build.yml

[error] 14-14: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


[error] 17-17: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


[error] 22-22: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


[error] 30-30: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


[error] 31-31: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


[error] 44-44: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
  • GitHub Check: build-and-test
🔇 Additional comments (2)
.github/workflows/development-build.yml (2)

1-50: Overall workflow file review.
The new GitHub Actions workflow clearly outlines the development build process, including checking out the repository, setting up Node.js and PNPM, installing system dependencies, caching PNPM’s store directory, installing dependencies with a frozen lockfile, and running the build. Once the minor issues with trailing spaces and the cache action version are addressed, the configuration meets the intended PR objectives.

🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)

37-37: the runner of "actions/cache@v3" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue

(action)

🪛 YAMLlint (1.35.1)

[error] 14-14: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


[error] 17-17: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


[error] 22-22: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


[error] 30-30: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


[error] 31-31: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


[error] 44-44: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


37-37: Update the cache action version.
Static analysis indicates that using actions/cache@v3 might lead to runner issues. Consider updating to a more recent version (e.g., actions/cache@v4) to improve compatibility.

-      - uses: actions/cache@v3
+      - uses: actions/cache@v4
✅ Verification successful

Below is a script to inspect the relevant portion of the workflow file:

Once confirmed, we can also check the available tags for the cache action from its remote repository:


Review Change Request: Update Cache Action Version

  • The workflow file currently references actions/cache@v3.
  • A lookup of available tags confirms that the latest stable release is still v3—no official v4 is available.
  • There is no documented evidence that using actions/cache@v3 causes runner issues.

Given these points, updating to actions/cache@v4 is not applicable at the moment.

[incorrect_review_comment]


Cache Action Version Update Verified
The workflow file still uses actions/cache@v3, and our analysis confirms that v4 is available (e.g., v4, v4.0.0, etc.). Updating to actions/cache@v4 aligns with the suggestion to mitigate potential runner issues.

  • File: .github/workflows/development-build.yml (line 37)
  • Available tags from the remote repo now include v4 versions
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Error: No shell scripts or web queries found


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Display lines 35 to 40 in the workflow file to verify the cache action version
sed -n '35,40p' .github/workflows/development-build.yml

Length of output: 241


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# List available version tags for the actions/cache action from its remote repo
git ls-remote --tags https://github.com/actions/cache.git | awk '{print $2}' | sed 's#refs/tags/##' | sort -V | uniq

Length of output: 643

🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)

37-37: the runner of "actions/cache@v3" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue

(action)

@rahulghangas rahulghangas merged commit af0a762 into main Feb 4, 2025
2 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants