-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 99
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Spam filter to work with flags from Rspamd and bogofilter #300
Open
Titan-C
wants to merge
1
commit into
afewmail:master
Choose a base branch
from
Titan-C:spam
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is pretty hard to read. I assume it'll call message.get_header() with every
header
configured in the filter, and filter out results that are an empty string (which can be the case if one of the headers doesn't exist)?What's the next() in front of everything doing here? Why is
value
still a single element? What happens if the filter returns multiple elements?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, you read it right.
value
is a single element, the first matching header. This is because theHeaderMatchingFilter
only matches a string, it only has a pattern to match a string. Up until now the filter only matches to one header. For spam, as there are many spam flagging tools, you get different headers depending on the tool, thus you need to be able to search for many headers.I assume, sysadmins don't run their many spam filters at one, they just pick a tool. Thus I pick the first not empty match(that is what
next
does), which might be the only match. Later I just let the the same logic of the filter run its way and match the pattern to the string. There I use the benefits of the regex. Spamassasing and Rspamd Mark with YES, their spam, bogofilter uses Spam.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
While it makes sense in the scope of
SpamFilter
, this changes semantics inHeaderMatchingFilter
in a non-intuitive and undocumented way.Can we expose this in
HeaderMatchingFilter
in a less confusing way, and have it documented?