This is a Deep learning powered app that detects TB from chest X rays.
Made with Fast.ai and trained on the the Montgomery and Shenzhen TB datasets and tested on the Jaypee institute TB Dataset [5]
The app is strictly not for diagnosis or treatment or making medical decisions as it has not undergone any clinical testing yet.
The working app can be found here, served with voila and binder (This is down, for now)
In practice, the CXR is used widely to make a confirmation of TB. It is also considered to be very sensitive for TB. Probably more sensitive than just a sputum test. However, the inter-operator variability in CXR reading is a big problem in TB. [3] Screenshots are from Toman TB [4]
in summary, the chapter on CXR reliability says:
Multiple studies have shown that DL models provide consistent and reliable TB diagnosis from CXRs [6][7]
I think removing the inter-operator bias, and Dl models that provide more than just labels with confidence, but also include localization, heat-maps or boundary boxes will go a long way in improving the diagnosis making process of TB.
This needs to be said as often as a ML model is spoken of: Unless we investigate and determine WHY and HOW (Hypothesis based testing) a ML model makes the decisions it makes, we'll always get things wrong. Here is a good example of an investigation into this: What are radiological deep learning models actually learning? By john Zech
- Explainable predictions (Heatmap or bounding boxes)
- Better models
- Model Zoo
[1] @misc{howard2018fastai, title={fastai}, author={Howard, Jeremy and others}, year={2018}, publisher={GitHub}, howpublished={\url{https://github.com/fastai/fastai}}, }
[2] Jaeger, S., Candemir, S., Antani, S., Wáng, Y. X., Lu, P. X., & Thoma, G. (2014). Two public chest X-ray datasets for computer-aided screening of pulmonary diseases. Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 4(6), 475–477. https://doi.org/10.3978/j.issn.2223-4292.2014.11.20
[3] World Health Organization. (2016). Chest radiography in tuberculosis detection: summary of current WHO recommendations and guidance on programmatic approaches. World Health Organization. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/252424
[4] Toman, K. (2004). Toman's Tuberculosis: case detection, treatment, and monitoring: questions and answers. World Health Organization.
[5] Chauhan A, Chauhan D, Rout C (2014) Role of Gist and PHOG Features in Computer-Aided Diagnosis of Tuberculosis without Segmentation. PLoS ONE 9(11): e112980. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0112980
[6] Harris, M., Qi, A., Jeagal, L., Torabi, N., Menzies, D., Korobitsyn, A., Pai, M., Nathavitharana, R. R., & Ahmad Khan, F. (2019). A systematic review of the diagnostic accuracy of artificial intelligence-based computer programs to analyze chest x-rays for pulmonary tuberculosis. PloS one, 14(9), e0221339. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0221339
[7] Qin, Z. Z., Sander, M. S., Rai, B., Titahong, C. N., Sudrungrot, S., Laah, S. N., ... & Creswell, J. (2019). Using artificial intelligence to read chest radiographs for tuberculosis detection: A multi-site evaluation of the diagnostic accuracy of three deep learning systems. Scientific reports, 9(1), 1-10.