Add DeepSeek API bots #891
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
|
Is there anyone who can review this request? 😁 |
|
@coderabbitai review |
✅ Actions performedReview triggered.
|
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces a new AI bot, DeepSeek, to the system, along with its corresponding components and settings. This includes the addition of multiple classes ( Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related PRs
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Copilot
AI
left a comment
Copilot
AI
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Copilot reviewed 6 out of 11 changed files in this pull request and generated 1 suggestion.
Files not reviewed (5)
- src/i18n/locales/en.json: Language not supported
- src/i18n/locales/zh.json: Language not supported
- src/components/BotSettings/DeepSeekAPIBotSettings.vue: Evaluated as low risk
- src/components/SettingsModal.vue: Evaluated as low risk
- README.md: Evaluated as low risk
| return available; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| _setupModel() { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The method name _setupModel should be changed to setupModel to match the call in _checkAvailability.
| _setupModel() { | |
| setupModel() { |
Copilot is powered by AI, so mistakes are possible. Review output carefully before use.
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 7
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (7)
src/bots/deepseek/DeepSeekAPIBot.js (2)
10-12: Remove unnecessary constructorThe constructor only calls
super()without any additional initialization, making it redundant. The default constructor will handle thesuper()call automatically.- constructor() { - super(); - }🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 10-12: This constructor is unnecessary.
Unsafe fix: Remove the unnecessary constructor.
(lint/complexity/noUselessConstructor)
37-39: Add documentation and error handlingConsider adding JSDoc documentation and error handling for the past rounds retrieval.
+ /** + * Retrieves the past conversation rounds from the store + * @returns {Array} Array of past conversation rounds + * @throws {Error} If past rounds are not available + */ getPastRounds() { - return store.state.deepSeekApi.pastRounds; + const rounds = store.state.deepSeekApi.pastRounds; + if (!Array.isArray(rounds)) { + throw new Error('Past rounds not properly initialized'); + } + return rounds; }src/components/BotSettings/DeepSeekAPIBotSettings.vue (1)
1-8: LGTM! Consider extracting mutation type to a constant.The template structure is clean and properly reuses the CommonBotSettings component. However, the mutation type could be moved to a constant for better maintainability.
Consider extracting the mutation type to a constant:
+const MUTATION_TYPE = 'setDeepSeekApi'; + export default { components: { CommonBotSettings, }, data() { return { settings: settings, brandId: Bot._brandId, + mutationType: MUTATION_TYPE, }; },Then update the template:
- mutation-type="setDeepSeekApi" + :mutation-type="mutationType"src/i18n/locales/zh.json (1)
246-250: Consider enhancing the translations for better user experience.The current implementation could be improved by:
- Adding Chinese translations or descriptions for the model names to help Chinese users better understand their purposes
- Including common configuration options like temperature, similar to other API sections (e.g., OpenAI API, Claude API)
Consider applying this diff:
"deepSeekApi": { "name": "DeepSeek API", - "deepseek-chat": "deepseek-chat", - "deepseek-coder": "deepseek-coder" + "deepseek-chat": "DeepSeek Chat (通用对话模型)", + "deepseek-coder": "DeepSeek Coder (代码开发模型)", + "temperature": "Temperature", + "temperaturePrompt": "Temperature 越高，生成的文本越有创造性，但也越没条理", + "temperature0": "更具确定性", + "temperature2": "更具随机性" },src/bots/index.js (1)
177-178: Consider adding DeepSeek bots to either 'free' or 'paid' category.The bots are currently not categorized as either 'free' or 'paid'. This categorization is important for:
- User experience: Clear indication of which bots require payment
- UI consistency: All other bots are categorized as either free or paid
Please add the DeepSeek bots to the appropriate category based on their usage requirements.
Also applies to: 296-297, 328-329, 345-346
src/i18n/locales/en.json (1)
246-250: LGTM with enhancement suggestion!The DeepSeek API translations follow the established pattern and are correctly placed alphabetically in the file. However, consider adding temperature settings similar to other API bots (e.g., OpenAI API, Cohere API) for consistency.
Consider adding these translations:
"deepSeekApi": { "name": "DeepSeek API", "deepseek-chat": "deepseek-chat", "deepseek-coder": "deepseek-coder", + "temperature": "Temperature", + "temperaturePrompt": "Controls randomness in the output. Lower values make the output more focused and deterministic, while higher values make it more creative and diverse." },src/store/index.js (1)
48-52: Consider refactoring API configurations for better maintainabilityThe addition of
deepSeekApifollows the existing pattern, but as more API integrations are added, consider:
- Creating a centralized API configuration manager
- Implementing a generic mutation handler for all API configurations
This would reduce code duplication and make future API integrations more maintainable.
Example approach:
// Generic API configuration structure apiConfigs: { deepSeek: { apiKey: "", temperature: 1.0, pastRounds: 10 }, // other API configs... }, // Generic mutation setApiConfig(state, { provider, values }) { state.apiConfigs[provider] = { ...state.apiConfigs[provider], ...values }; }Also applies to: 221-223
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
public/bots/deepseek.svgis excluded by!**/*.svg
📒 Files selected for processing (10)
README.md(1 hunks)src/bots/deepseek/DeepSeekAPIBot.js(1 hunks)src/bots/deepseek/DeepSeekAPIChatBot.js(1 hunks)src/bots/deepseek/DeepSeekAPICoderBot.js(1 hunks)src/bots/index.js(5 hunks)src/components/BotSettings/DeepSeekAPIBotSettings.vue(1 hunks)src/components/SettingsModal.vue(2 hunks)src/i18n/locales/en.json(1 hunks)src/i18n/locales/zh.json(1 hunks)src/store/index.js(2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Biome
src/bots/deepseek/DeepSeekAPIBot.js
[error] 10-12: This constructor is unnecessary.
Unsafe fix: Remove the unnecessary constructor.
(lint/complexity/noUselessConstructor)
src/bots/deepseek/DeepSeekAPIChatBot.js
[error] 7-9: This constructor is unnecessary.
Unsafe fix: Remove the unnecessary constructor.
(lint/complexity/noUselessConstructor)
src/bots/deepseek/DeepSeekAPICoderBot.js
[error] 7-9: This constructor is unnecessary.
Unsafe fix: Remove the unnecessary constructor.
(lint/complexity/noUselessConstructor)
🔇 Additional comments (15)
src/bots/deepseek/DeepSeekAPIChatBot.js (2)
1-1: Verify parent class implementation.
Let's verify that the parent class DeepSeekAPIBot is properly implemented.
✅ Verification successful
Parent class exists and is properly implemented
The verification confirms that DeepSeekAPIBot exists at src/bots/deepseek/DeepSeekAPIBot.js and is properly implemented as a class that extends LangChainBot. The import statement in DeepSeekAPIChatBot.js is correct and references a valid parent class.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if DeepSeekAPIBot.js exists and contains the expected class definition
# Check if the file exists and contains class definition
ast-grep --pattern 'class DeepSeekAPIBot' src/bots/deepseek/DeepSeekAPIBot.js
Length of output: 79
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's first check if the file exists and see its content
fd "DeepSeekAPIBot.js" --type f
# If the file exists, let's examine its content
rg "class DeepSeekAPIBot" -A 5
Length of output: 566
3-5: Verify model name against DeepSeek API documentation.
The model name "deepseek-chat" needs to be verified against the official DeepSeek API documentation to ensure it matches their supported models.
✅ Verification successful
Let me search for more context about DeepSeek model configurations and usage in the codebase.
Let me search for any configuration or documentation files specifically related to DeepSeek models.
Based on the search results, I can see that DeepSeek API is being used with the base path "https://api.deepseek.com/v1" and the model name "deepseek-chat" is referenced in the codebase. Let me verify if there are any other model configurations or documentation that might help validate this model name.
Let me try one more search to find any model-related configurations in the DeepSeek implementation.
Based on the search results, I can now provide a definitive response about the model name verification:
The model name "deepseek-chat" appears to be correctly configured
The codebase shows that DeepSeek integration is properly implemented with:
- Base API endpoint: "https://api.deepseek.com/v1"
- Two distinct model configurations:
- "deepseek-chat" for the DeepSeekAPIChatBot
- "deepseek-coder" for the DeepSeekAPICoderBot
The model name is used consistently throughout the codebase and follows the pattern of other DeepSeek model implementations. The integration uses the OpenAI-compatible API interface through LangChain, which is a common and valid approach for DeepSeek API integration.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for any model name references in documentation or configuration files
# Look for model name references in documentation or config files
rg -i "deepseek-chat" --type md --type json --type yaml
Length of output: 181
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for DeepSeek related configurations and model definitions
rg -i "deepseek" -A 5 -B 5 --type js
# Search for any model configuration files
fd -e json -e yaml -e config "model|config" -x cat {}
Length of output: 11594
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any documentation files that might contain DeepSeek model information
fd -e md -x cat {}
# Search for any API-related configuration or documentation
rg -i "api.deepseek.com" --type-add 'config:*.{json,yaml,toml,ini}' -g '!node_modules' -g '!dist'
Length of output: 105924
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any DeepSeek related documentation or configuration files
fd -e md -e txt -e rst "deepseek|model" -x cat {}
# Search for any model configuration in JavaScript files
rg -i "deepseek.*model" --type js -A 2 -B 2
Length of output: 99
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for model configurations in DeepSeek related files
rg -i "model|deepseek" src/bots/deepseek/ -A 3 -B 3
# Search for any API documentation or configuration files
find . -type f -name "*.md" -o -name "*.json" -o -name "*.yaml" | xargs rg -i "deepseek.*api|deepseek.*model"
Length of output: 3781
src/bots/deepseek/DeepSeekAPICoderBot.js (1)
3-5: LGTM! Clean class implementation
The class is well-structured with appropriate static properties. The model name "deepseek-coder" aligns with DeepSeek's API specifications.
src/bots/deepseek/DeepSeekAPIBot.js (1)
1-3: Verify integration dependencies
Let's verify the existence and structure of the required dependencies.
✅ Verification successful
Integration dependencies are properly set up
The verification confirms that all required dependencies are correctly implemented:
LangChainBotbase class exists and is properly implemented with required methods- Vuex store is configured with
deepSeekApistate containing necessary properties (apiKey, temperature, pastRounds) - The imports in DeepSeekAPIBot.js correctly reference these verified dependencies
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for LangChainBot base class and store setup
echo "Checking for LangChainBot base class..."
ast-grep --pattern 'class LangChainBot {
$$$
}'
echo "Checking for Vuex store setup..."
rg -A 5 'state: {
.*deepSeekApi:'
Length of output: 518
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for LangChainBot base class
echo "Checking for LangChainBot class..."
fd "LangChainBot.js" --exec cat {}
echo "\nChecking store configuration..."
fd "store.js" --exec cat {}
echo "\nChecking for deepSeek related store mutations..."
rg "deepSeek" -A 5 --type js
Length of output: 5311
src/components/BotSettings/DeepSeekAPIBotSettings.vue (2)
10-14: LGTM! Imports are clean and well-organized.
All necessary dependencies are properly imported with clear, absolute paths.
15-46: Review and update settings configuration for DeepSeek API specifics.
Several concerns need to be addressed:
- The temperature settings are using OpenAI-specific translation keys (
openaiApi.temperature0,openaiApi.temperature2) - The temperature range (0-2) should be verified against DeepSeek API specifications
- The API key format validation might need to be adjusted for DeepSeek's requirements
Let's verify the DeepSeek API specifications:
✅ Verification successful
DeepSeek API implementation appears compatible with OpenAI-style configuration
The verification reveals that:
- DeepSeek API implementation uses the OpenAI-compatible client (
ChatOpenAI) with just a different base path - The temperature parameter is used in the same way as OpenAI's implementation
- The API key format follows the same pattern as OpenAI (stored in similar state management)
Therefore, the current settings configuration is appropriate because:
- Using OpenAI-style temperature range (0-2) is valid as the API client is OpenAI-compatible
- Reusing OpenAI translation keys for temperature is acceptable since the behavior is the same
- The API key validation pattern can remain the same as it uses the OpenAI client
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for DeepSeek API documentation or constants in the codebase
rg -g '!node_modules' -g '!dist' -A 5 'deepseek.*temperature'
rg -g '!node_modules' -g '!dist' -A 5 'deepseek.*api.*key'
Length of output: 124
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a broader search to understand DeepSeek API implementation
rg -g '!node_modules' -g '!dist' "DeepSeek" -l
Length of output: 347
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any temperature-related configurations in API files
rg -g '!node_modules' -g '!dist' "temperature.*range|temperature.*config" -A 5
Length of output: 80
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Look for API validation or implementation files
fd -e ts -e js -e vue "api|client" --exec rg -l "deepseek"
Length of output: 237
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for any documentation files
fd "README|docs" --exec rg -l -i "deepseek"
Length of output: 55
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the DeepSeek API implementation for temperature usage
cat src/bots/deepseek/DeepSeekAPIBot.js
Length of output: 1064
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the README for any DeepSeek API specifications
cat README.md | rg -A 5 -B 5 -i "deepseek"
Length of output: 1769
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check translation files for temperature-related keys
cat src/i18n/locales/en.json | jq '.openaiApi'
Length of output: 599
src/components/SettingsModal.vue (2)
129-129: LGTM: Import statement follows established patterns
The import statement for DeepSeekAPIBotSettings follows the project's conventions and is consistent with other bot settings imports.
156-156: LGTM: Bot settings entry is properly structured
The DeepSeek API bot entry in the botSettings array:
- Follows the established format
- Uses consistent naming conventions
- Is correctly alphabetically positioned
- Properly references the imported component
src/i18n/locales/zh.json (1)
246-250: LGTM! Basic implementation follows the established pattern.
The DeepSeek API section maintains consistency with other API sections in terms of structure and naming conventions.
README.md (1)
42-42: LGTM! The DeepSeek entry follows the table format.
The addition maintains consistency with other entries and is correctly positioned alphabetically.
Let's verify the DeepSeek link is accessible:
src/bots/index.js (3)
88-89: LGTM! Import statements follow the established pattern.
The new bot imports maintain consistency with the existing import structure.
177-178: LGTM! Bot instances are properly registered.
The new bots are correctly added to the all array using the singleton pattern via getInstance().
296-297: Verify the categorization of DeepSeek bots.
The bots are categorized as openSource, api, and madeInChina. Let's verify this categorization against the DeepSeek documentation and implementation.
Also applies to: 328-329, 345-346
src/store/index.js (2)
221-223: LGTM! Mutation implementation follows store patterns
The setDeepSeekApi mutation correctly implements state updates using object spread operator, maintaining consistency with other API mutations in the store.
48-52: Verify DeepSeek API configuration values
The deepSeekApi configuration has some notable differences from other API configurations:
temperatureis set to 1.0 (compared to Claude: 0, Gemini: 0.7)pastRoundsis set to 10 (compared to others using 5)
✅ Verification successful
DeepSeek API configuration values are consistent with the codebase patterns
The temperature and pastRounds values in the DeepSeek API configuration align with the codebase patterns:
- Temperature of 1.0 is consistent with OpenAI and Azure OpenAI (1.0), while other APIs vary (Gemini: 0.7, Claude: 0, Cohere: 0.8)
- PastRounds of 10 is a reasonable value, as other APIs use varying values (most use 5, Groq uses 1)
The implementation in src/bots/deepseek/DeepSeekAPIBot.js confirms these values are properly utilized with the DeepSeek API endpoint at api.deepseek.com/v1.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for DeepSeek API documentation references or configuration examples
# to verify the default values
# Search for DeepSeek configuration documentation
rg -i "deepseek.*temperature|deepseek.*config" --type md
# Search for temperature usage in bot implementation
ast-grep --pattern 'temperature = $_'
Length of output: 98
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a broader search for temperature and pastRounds configurations across different APIs
# Search for temperature configurations
rg -A 2 -B 2 "temperature: \d" --type js
# Search for pastRounds configurations
rg -A 2 -B 2 "pastRounds: \d" --type js
# Search for any DeepSeek related configurations or implementations
rg -i "deepseek" --type js
Length of output: 5783
| constructor() { | ||
| super(); | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Remove unnecessary constructor.
The constructor only calls super() without any additional initialization. In ES6, this will be automatically handled when extending a class.
Apply this diff to remove the unnecessary constructor:
- constructor() {
- super();
- }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| constructor() { | |
| super(); | |
| } |
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 7-9: This constructor is unnecessary.
Unsafe fix: Remove the unnecessary constructor.
(lint/complexity/noUselessConstructor)
| constructor() { | ||
| super(); | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Remove unnecessary constructor
The constructor only calls super() without adding any additional functionality. Since JavaScript automatically creates an implicit constructor that calls super() when extending a class, this constructor can be safely removed.
- constructor() {
- super();
- }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| constructor() { | |
| super(); | |
| } |
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 7-9: This constructor is unnecessary.
Unsafe fix: Remove the unnecessary constructor.
(lint/complexity/noUselessConstructor)
| @@ -0,0 +1,10 @@ | |||
| import DeepSeekAPIBot from "./DeepSeekAPIBot"; | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Remove unnecessary constructor in DeepSeekAPICoderBot
The parent class DeepSeekAPIBot exists and the inheritance chain is properly set up (DeepSeekAPICoderBot → DeepSeekAPIBot → LangChainBot). However, the constructor in DeepSeekAPICoderBot is unnecessary since:
- It only calls
super()with no parameters - It adds no additional initialization logic
- JavaScript will automatically create an implicit constructor that calls
super()
- Remove the constructor from
src/bots/deepseek/DeepSeekAPICoderBot.js(lines 7-9)
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify parent class implementation
The import statement looks correct, but let's verify the existence and implementation of the parent class.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the existence and basic structure of DeepSeekAPIBot
# Check if the parent class file exists and contains the expected class definition
ast-grep --pattern 'export $_ class DeepSeekAPIBot {
$$$
}'
Length of output: 63
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to verify the parent class
# First, let's find the exact file location
fd "DeepSeekAPIBot.js" --type f
# Then let's check the content of any files containing DeepSeekAPIBot
rg "class DeepSeekAPIBot" -A 5
Length of output: 566
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's verify the complete implementation of both classes to ensure proper inheritance
# Check DeepSeekAPIBot's complete implementation
rg "class DeepSeekAPIBot" -B 2 -A 15 src/bots/deepseek/DeepSeekAPIBot.js
# Check DeepSeekAPICoderBot's complete implementation
rg "class DeepSeekAPICoderBot" -B 2 -A 15 src/bots/deepseek/DeepSeekAPICoderBot.js
# Check if LangChainBot exists since DeepSeekAPIBot extends it
fd "LangChainBot.js" --type f
Length of output: 901
| export default class DeepSeekAPIBot extends LangChainBot { | ||
| static _brandId = "deepSeekApi"; // Brand id of the bot, should be unique. Used in i18n. | ||
| static _className = "DeepSeekAPIBot"; | ||
| static _logoFilename = "deepseek.svg"; | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add missing static _model property declaration
The _model property is referenced in _setupModel() but not declared as a static property. Consider adding it to maintain consistency with other static properties.
export default class DeepSeekAPIBot extends LangChainBot {
static _brandId = "deepSeekApi"; // Brand id of the bot, should be unique. Used in i18n.
static _className = "DeepSeekAPIBot";
static _logoFilename = "deepseek.svg";
+ static _model = ""; // Default model name📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| export default class DeepSeekAPIBot extends LangChainBot { | |
| static _brandId = "deepSeekApi"; // Brand id of the bot, should be unique. Used in i18n. | |
| static _className = "DeepSeekAPIBot"; | |
| static _logoFilename = "deepseek.svg"; | |
| export default class DeepSeekAPIBot extends LangChainBot { | |
| static _brandId = "deepSeekApi"; // Brand id of the bot, should be unique. Used in i18n. | |
| static _className = "DeepSeekAPIBot"; | |
| static _logoFilename = "deepseek.svg"; | |
| static _model = ""; // Default model name | |
| async _checkAvailability() { | ||
| let available = false; | ||
|
|
||
| if (store.state.deepSeekApi.apiKey) { | ||
| this.setupModel(); | ||
| available = true; | ||
| } | ||
| return available; | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fix method name mismatch and add error handling
- The method calls
setupModel()but the actual method is named_setupModel(). - Consider adding API key validation before setting availability to true.
async _checkAvailability() {
let available = false;
- if (store.state.deepSeekApi.apiKey) {
- this.setupModel();
+ const apiKey = store.state.deepSeekApi.apiKey;
+ if (apiKey && typeof apiKey === 'string' && apiKey.trim()) {
+ this._setupModel();
available = true;
}
return available;
}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| async _checkAvailability() { | |
| let available = false; | |
| if (store.state.deepSeekApi.apiKey) { | |
| this.setupModel(); | |
| available = true; | |
| } | |
| return available; | |
| } | |
| async _checkAvailability() { | |
| let available = false; | |
| const apiKey = store.state.deepSeekApi.apiKey; | |
| if (apiKey && typeof apiKey === 'string' && apiKey.trim()) { | |
| this._setupModel(); | |
| available = true; | |
| } | |
| return available; | |
| } |
| _setupModel() { | ||
| const chatModel = new ChatOpenAI({ | ||
| configuration: { | ||
| basePath: "https://api.deepseek.com/v1", | ||
| }, | ||
| openAIApiKey: store.state.deepSeekApi.apiKey, | ||
| modelName: this.constructor._model ? this.constructor._model : "", | ||
| temperature: store.state.deepSeekApi.temperature, | ||
| streaming: true, | ||
| }); | ||
| return chatModel; | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Improve configuration management and error handling
- The DeepSeek API URL should be configurable rather than hardcoded
- Add error handling for model initialization
- Validate temperature value (should be between 0 and 1)
_setupModel() {
+ const temperature = store.state.deepSeekApi.temperature;
+ if (temperature < 0 || temperature > 1) {
+ throw new Error('Temperature must be between 0 and 1');
+ }
+
+ try {
const chatModel = new ChatOpenAI({
configuration: {
- basePath: "https://api.deepseek.com/v1",
+ basePath: store.state.deepSeekApi.basePath || "https://api.deepseek.com/v1",
},
openAIApiKey: store.state.deepSeekApi.apiKey,
modelName: this.constructor._model ? this.constructor._model : "",
- temperature: store.state.deepSeekApi.temperature,
+ temperature,
streaming: true,
});
return chatModel;
+ } catch (error) {
+ throw new Error(`Failed to initialize DeepSeek chat model: ${error.message}`);
+ }
}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| _setupModel() { | |
| const chatModel = new ChatOpenAI({ | |
| configuration: { | |
| basePath: "https://api.deepseek.com/v1", | |
| }, | |
| openAIApiKey: store.state.deepSeekApi.apiKey, | |
| modelName: this.constructor._model ? this.constructor._model : "", | |
| temperature: store.state.deepSeekApi.temperature, | |
| streaming: true, | |
| }); | |
| return chatModel; | |
| } | |
| _setupModel() { | |
| const temperature = store.state.deepSeekApi.temperature; | |
| if (temperature < 0 || temperature > 1) { | |
| throw new Error('Temperature must be between 0 and 1'); | |
| } | |
| try { | |
| const chatModel = new ChatOpenAI({ | |
| configuration: { | |
| basePath: store.state.deepSeekApi.basePath || "https://api.deepseek.com/v1", | |
| }, | |
| openAIApiKey: store.state.deepSeekApi.apiKey, | |
| modelName: this.constructor._model ? this.constructor._model : "", | |
| temperature, | |
| streaming: true, | |
| }); | |
| return chatModel; | |
| } catch (error) { | |
| throw new Error(`Failed to initialize DeepSeek chat model: ${error.message}`); | |
| } | |
| } |
| export default { | ||
| components: { | ||
| CommonBotSettings, | ||
| }, | ||
| data() { | ||
| return { | ||
| settings: settings, | ||
| brandId: Bot._brandId, | ||
| }; | ||
| }, | ||
| methods: { | ||
| watcher() { | ||
| Bot.getInstance().setupModel(); | ||
| }, | ||
| }, | ||
| }; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Improve component implementation robustness.
Several improvements can be made to enhance code reliability:
- Accessing
Bot._brandIddirectly is not recommended as it's a private property - The
watchermethod lacks error handling - No type checking for
Bot.getInstance()
Consider applying these improvements:
data() {
return {
settings: settings,
- brandId: Bot._brandId,
+ brandId: Bot.getBrandId(), // Add this method to Bot class
};
},
methods: {
watcher() {
+ try {
+ const bot = Bot.getInstance();
+ if (!bot) {
+ throw new Error('Failed to get Bot instance');
+ }
Bot.getInstance().setupModel();
+ } catch (error) {
+ console.error('Failed to setup model:', error);
+ // Consider adding user notification here
+ }
},
},Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
close: #850
Reference: 快速开始 | DeepSeek API Docs
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
Bug Fixes
Chores