Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Providing support for atomistic StructureData #6632
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Providing support for atomistic StructureData #6632
Changes from 5 commits
1c24082
21897d9
b9d739c
87032b4
f45ee30
f44eddf
81eeb08
2b05eed
fe6cbcc
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think this can directly move to raise exception?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
see #6632 (comment)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think here you want to create a structure to be shared for many sub-tests. It would be better to use fixture.
The profile is more suitable for if you need to test the store and read data nodes from DB. If you need profile, there is
aiida_profile
fixture to use.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hi @unkcpz, would it be better to put also the last two tests in the above
TestKpoints
class but marked with the skip_atomistic fixture, and then in the init profile add a self.atomistic = self.structure.to_atomistic which run only if has_atomistic?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, I think that'll be better!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This can be moved as a
generate_atomistic_structure_data()
when called it return this example structure.I think there is also quite a bit duplicated code between
TestKpoints
andTestKpointsAtomisticStructureData
. My suggestion is to combine these to above and use https://docs.pytest.org/en/stable/how-to/parametrize.html that same test logic works for both of them.