-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add benchmark for roundtrip of 100 large WebSocket messages #9645
Conversation
Will need to tweak it a bit for 3.10 |
CodSpeed Performance ReportMerging #9645 will not alter performanceComparing Summary
Benchmarks breakdown
|
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #9645 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 98.64% 98.64%
=======================================
Files 115 115
Lines 35395 35417 +22
Branches 4196 4199 +3
=======================================
+ Hits 34916 34938 +22
Misses 321 321
Partials 158 158
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
Backport to 3.10: 💚 backport PR created✅ Backport PR branch: Backported as #9647 🤖 @patchback |
(cherry picked from commit 541b149)
Backport to 3.11: 💚 backport PR created✅ Backport PR branch: Backported as #9648 🤖 @patchback |
(cherry picked from commit 541b149)
… large WebSocket messages (#9647) Co-authored-by: J. Nick Koston <[email protected]>
… large WebSocket messages (#9648) Co-authored-by: J. Nick Koston <[email protected]>
SSIA
For testing if #9634 is viable
Looks like almost all the overhead is
memcpy