Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[BUG] Top-level Strategies should be to the left of top-level Claims #539

Open
cptanalatriste opened this issue Jul 10, 2024 · 1 comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working design An issue related to some design or general aesthetic improvement.

Comments

@cptanalatriste
Copy link
Collaborator

Summary

Top-level Strategies should be to the left of top-level Claims

Steps to reproduce

For the following case:

image

I did the following:

  1. Created S1
  2. Created P1
  3. Created S2
  4. Created P2

What you expected to happen/ what really did happen

P1 and P2 should be together and to the right of S1 and S2.

Version/ platform

Current behaviour tested on staging on July 10th.

@chrisdburr
Copy link
Collaborator

Adding to current sprint, so we may need to keep it going for a little bit longer.

@chrisdburr chrisdburr added design An issue related to some design or general aesthetic improvement. and removed improved navigation Sprint 1: Improved navigation of cases labels Aug 13, 2024
@chrisdburr chrisdburr changed the title [IMPROVEMENT] Top-level Strategies should be to the left of top-level Claims Top-level Strategies should be to the left of top-level Claims Aug 13, 2024
@chrisdburr chrisdburr changed the title Top-level Strategies should be to the left of top-level Claims [BUG] Top-level Strategies should be to the left of top-level Claims Nov 7, 2024
@chrisdburr chrisdburr added the bug Something isn't working label Nov 7, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working design An issue related to some design or general aesthetic improvement.
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants