-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix elastic #2049
Fix elastic #2049
Conversation
Reviewer's Guide by SourceryThe PR refactors the noise field generation in the elastic transformation code by consolidating common operations and simplifying the logic flow. The changes maintain the same functionality while making the code more maintainable and reducing duplication. Class diagram for generate_displacement_fields function refactorclassDiagram
class generate_displacement_fields {
+generate_noise_field() np.ndarray
}
class generate_noise_field {
+generate_noise_field() np.ndarray
+noise_distribution: String
+random_generator: RandomGenerator
+image_shape: Tuple
+kernel_size: Tuple
+sigma: Float
+alpha: Float
+field: np.ndarray
}
generate_displacement_fields --> generate_noise_field
note for generate_noise_field "Refactored to consolidate common operations and simplify logic flow."
File-Level Changes
Tips and commandsInteracting with Sourcery
Customizing Your ExperienceAccess your dashboard to:
Getting Help
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hey @ternaus - I've reviewed your changes - here's some feedback:
Overall Comments:
- The else clause should explicitly check for 'uniform' distribution to prevent silent failures if new distribution types are added in the future
- The gaussian normalization step (multiply by 2 and subtract 1) was removed, which means gaussian noise is no longer scaled to [-1, 1] range like the uniform distribution
Here's what I looked at during the review
- 🟢 General issues: all looks good
- 🟢 Security: all looks good
- 🟢 Testing: all looks good
- 🟢 Complexity: all looks good
- 🟢 Documentation: all looks good
Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #2049 +/- ##
=========================================
+ Coverage 0 90.33% +90.33%
=========================================
Files 0 46 +46
Lines 0 7596 +7596
=========================================
+ Hits 0 6862 +6862
- Misses 0 734 +734 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
Summary by Sourcery
Bug Fixes: