Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Distortion Parameter details #1649

Draft
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: develop
Choose a base branch
from
Draft

Distortion Parameter details #1649

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

natowi
Copy link
Member

@natowi natowi commented Mar 19, 2022

Description

Clarifying Distortion Parameter order

Related to
#1647
#1484

Copy link
Contributor

@servantftechnicolor servantftechnicolor left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This description depends on the camera model choosen. Definitly not a constant description.

@natowi
Copy link
Member Author

natowi commented Mar 25, 2022

@servantftechnicolor In that case it would be great if you could provide more details

I found this - does the order apply for this node as well?:

1: Pinhole => 3 parameters (focal, principal point x, principal point y)
2: Pinhole radial 1 => 4 params (focal, principal point x, principal point y, one radial distortion factor)
3: Pinhole radial 3 (default) => 6 params (focal, principal point x, principal point y, 3 radial distortion factors)
4: Pinhole brown 2 => 8 params (focal, principal point x, principal point y, 5 distortion factors (3radial+2 tangential))
5: Pinhole with a simple Fish-eye distortion => 7 params (focal, principal point x, principal point y, 4 distortion factors)
openMVG/openMVG#678 (comment)
https://openmvg.readthedocs.io/en/latest/openMVG/cameras/cameras/#pinhole-camera-model

@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Jul 31, 2022

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

@stale stale bot added the stale for issues that becomes stale (no solution) label Jul 31, 2022
@simogasp simogasp added scope:doc do not close issue that should stay open (avoid automatically close because stale) and removed stale for issues that becomes stale (no solution) labels Jul 31, 2022
@simogasp
Copy link
Member

we need to put this info somewhere.
I had started to compile something like this
image
I need to complete it with the 3DE models but then we should put it in the Doxygen of each class and in the main doc

@fabiencastan fabiencastan marked this pull request as draft January 15, 2023 12:47
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
do not close issue that should stay open (avoid automatically close because stale) scope:doc
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants