-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Package vulnerabilities addressed #362
base: develop
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces several changes to the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
service/package.json (1)
Node.js version inconsistency detected across package.json files
There are conflicting Node.js version requirements in the codebase:
- One package.json requires
"node": ">=16.15.0"
- Another package.json requires
"node": ">=20.15.0"
- Both files have Volta configuration pinned to
"node": "20.15.1"
This version inconsistency needs to be addressed to ensure consistent behavior across the project. The older requirement of Node.js 16.15.0 should be updated to match the newer requirement of 20.15.0 to maintain compatibility.
🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
93-95
: Verify Node.js version compatibilityThe Node.js engine requirement has been updated to >=20.15.0. This is a significant change that needs to be coordinated across environments.
Ensure all deployment environments support Node.js 20.15.0+
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for Node.js version specific features rg -l "(?:\.replaceAll|\.at\(|\.findLast|\.findLastIndex)" | while read -r file; do echo "=== $file ===" rg "(?:\.replaceAll|\.at\(|\.findLast|\.findLastIndex)" "$file" doneLength of output: 75
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's check the Node.js version requirements across package.json files echo "=== Node.js Engine Requirements ===" fd package.json --exec grep -A 1 -B 1 '"node":' # Check for any other potential Node.js version constraints echo -e "\n=== Other Version Related Configurations ===" fd package.json --exec grep -A 2 -B 2 'engines\|volta\|nodeVersion'Length of output: 745
service/src/common/exceptions/base.exception.ts (1)
5-5
: Enhance type safety for error codesThe
code
property uses string type but is initialized fromAlkemioErrorStatus
. Consider maintaining the enum type for better type safety.- public readonly code: string; + public readonly code: AlkemioErrorStatus; - this.code = code.toLocaleString(); + this.code = code;Also applies to: 9-9
service/src/services/external/notifme/notifme.module.ts (1)
Line range hint
3-3
: Remove unused importThe
WINSTON_MODULE_NEST_PROVIDER
import is no longer used after its removal fromTEMPLATE_PROVIDER
.-import { WINSTON_MODULE_NEST_PROVIDER } from 'nest-winston';
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (2)
lib/package-lock.json
is excluded by!**/package-lock.json
service/package-lock.json
is excluded by!**/package-lock.json
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
service/package.json
(1 hunks)service/src/common/exceptions/base.exception.ts
(1 hunks)service/src/config/winston.config.ts
(0 hunks)service/src/services/external/notifme/notifme.module.ts
(1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- service/src/config/winston.config.ts
🔇 Additional comments (3)
service/package.json (1)
38-42
: Verify NestJS v10 migration steps
The upgrade from NestJS v8 to v10 is significant and may introduce breaking changes. Please ensure all breaking changes have been addressed according to the migration guide.
Consider adding the following to your PR description:
- Link to NestJS v8 to v10 migration guide
- List of breaking changes addressed
- Testing strategy for the upgrade
✅ Verification successful
Based on the results, I can see that the codebase follows standard NestJS patterns with proper usage of decorators like @Injectable()
, @Controller()
, @Module()
, and @Catch()
. The code structure appears to be compatible with NestJS v10, as it follows the same decorator patterns and module structure that are maintained across NestJS versions.
Let me verify one more aspect regarding the breaking changes in NestJS v10:
NestJS v10 upgrade appears safe to proceed
The codebase shows compatibility with NestJS v10 patterns:
- No custom decorators that could be affected by breaking changes
- Single exception filter implementation follows standard pattern
- Standard usage of platform-express without custom modifications
- Core NestJS decorators (@Injectable, @controller, @module) are used correctly
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for potential breaking changes in NestJS v10 migration
rg -l "(@nestjs|Injectable|Controller|Module|Catch|ExceptionFilter)" | while read -r file; do
echo "=== $file ==="
rg "(Injectable|Controller|Module|Catch|ExceptionFilter)" "$file"
done
Length of output: 28966
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for potential breaking changes patterns
# 1. Check for custom decorators (breaking change in v10)
rg "export.*Decorator"
# 2. Check for platform-express specific code (changed in v10)
rg "platform-express|NestExpressApplication"
# 3. Check for custom exception filters (changed in v10)
rg "implements.*ExceptionFilter"
Length of output: 291
service/src/common/exceptions/base.exception.ts (1)
3-9
: Verify error handling compatibility
The change from ApolloError
to Error
is significant and may affect error handling across the application. While the change is good for removing the Apollo dependency, we need to ensure consistent error handling.
Consider:
- Documenting the new error handling strategy
- Adding error type guards if needed
- Updating error handling documentation
✅ Verification successful
Error handling changes are safely implemented
The verification shows that the error handling is consistent and well-structured:
- A centralized
HttpExceptionsFilter
properly handlesBaseException
- All custom exceptions properly extend
BaseException
with appropriate error codes and contexts - Error handling is standardized across the notification service domain
The change from ApolloError
to Error
is safe because:
- Custom exceptions maintain consistent error handling through inheritance
- Error context and codes are preserved through the
BaseException
properties - The application uses a custom exception filter rather than relying on Apollo-specific error handling
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for existing error handling patterns
rg -A 3 "catch\s*\([^)]*\)\s*{" | grep -v "base.exception.ts"
Length of output: 167
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for catch blocks with better regex
rg -A 3 "catch.*{" --type ts
# Search for error handling patterns
rg -A 3 "throw new \w+Exception" --type ts
# Look for error handling middleware or error interceptors
rg -A 3 "(handleError|errorHandler|ErrorInterceptor)" --type ts
# Check if BaseException is used across the codebase
rg -A 2 "BaseException" --type ts
Length of output: 8118
service/src/services/external/notifme/notifme.module.ts (1)
Line range hint 11-24
: Verify logging functionality
The removal of WINSTON_MODULE_NEST_PROVIDER
from TEMPLATE_PROVIDER
suggests a change in logging strategy. Ensure logging still works as expected.
Document the new logging approach if it has changed significantly.
@@ -37,52 +35,48 @@ | |||
"dependencies": { | |||
"@alkemio/client-lib": "^0.32.0", | |||
"@alkemio/notifications-lib": "0.10.1", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Verify client-lib compatibility
The PR depends on client-lib#130, but the package.json shows @alkemio/client-lib at version 0.32.0 while PR description mentions updating to 0.33.0.
Update the client-lib version to match PR description:
- "@alkemio/client-lib": "^0.32.0",
+ "@alkemio/client-lib": "^0.33.0",
Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
0.33.0
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Refactor