-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 108
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Make :date
behave as :deadline
and :scheduled
#96
Open
zaeph
wants to merge
12
commits into
alphapapa:master
Choose a base branch
from
zaeph:improve-date
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
12 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
ec83138
Use SCHEDULED/DEADLINE template for timestamps
zaeph f566e3d
Reorganise defgroups based on time info
zaeph f8ceae5
Implement date-matcher macro
zaeph 213a850
Make doc-string the 2nd argument of the defgroup macros
zaeph 5580786
Replace defgroups for time with defgroup-with-time-tests
zaeph cc59437
Deprecate/alias :date in favour of :timestamp
zaeph ffba1d6
Update README.org
zaeph 4fe8ef5
Update README.info
zaeph a7c5176
Update README.info to makeinfo 6.6
zaeph da49946
README: Place ‘timestamp’ in alphabetical order
zaeph 4a00534
Fix mishandled deprecation
zaeph d4f8a51
Revert "Deprecate/alias :date in favour of :timestamp"
zaeph File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I’m using
alist-get
, but I think this is a recent addition to Emacs. We can use(cdr (assoc …))
instead.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
alist-get
is fine, and I much prefer it over(cdr (assoc
. :)There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Perfect! I was in the process of rebasing the commits on top of
master
. Would you like me to still do it?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I ended up merging master.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Please rebase it. PRs should generally, if not always, be rebased. You should never merge
master
into a PR branch; imagine the commit graph when the PR branch is then merged back intomaster
! :)There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sure, I'll do that instead.