You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi!
I am currently working on the IDseq metagenomics platform to identify mapped reads to SARS-CoV-2. Basically my project consists on the sequencing of all reads from a clinical samples with COVID-19, and assemble the viral genome. The wet lab protocol is from MSSPE, so I enrich the sequencing library preparation with 73 primers spanning the viral genome. To test the pipeline, I have uploaded negative controls (water controls with the primers), and iVar seems to report a few reads that partially match the primers (about 10, 20, and up to 200 reads). Could this be some sort of miss-priming issue? Would this be fixed by using the ivar getmasked? Or is this something else? (I am attaching a picture of how my results look in this pipeline)
The IDSeq pipeline uses the following commands:
ivar trim -e -i ivar.bam -b "~{primer_bed}" -p ivar.out
ivar consensus -q "~{ivarQualThreshold}" -t "~{ivarFreqThreshold}" -m "~{minDepth}" -n N -p "~{prefix}primertrimmed.consensus"
Thanks a lot for your help!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi, ivar will trim any reads that start or end within the coordinates provided in the BED file. It does not take the sequence of bases itself into account. So, it's possible that a few reads started at primer positions and iVar trimmed those. Does that answer your question?
ivar getmasked is used to report if there are mismatches between the primer and the reference sequence. That is for downstream filtering for variant calling so should not affect primer trimming.
Hi!
I am currently working on the IDseq metagenomics platform to identify mapped reads to SARS-CoV-2. Basically my project consists on the sequencing of all reads from a clinical samples with COVID-19, and assemble the viral genome. The wet lab protocol is from MSSPE, so I enrich the sequencing library preparation with 73 primers spanning the viral genome. To test the pipeline, I have uploaded negative controls (water controls with the primers), and iVar seems to report a few reads that partially match the primers (about 10, 20, and up to 200 reads). Could this be some sort of miss-priming issue? Would this be fixed by using the
ivar getmasked
? Or is this something else? (I am attaching a picture of how my results look in this pipeline)The IDSeq pipeline uses the following commands:
Thanks a lot for your help!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: