Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[PR #1768/d1c5f053 backport][stable-6] elb_application_lb_info - ensure queries for additional ALB data have retries enabled #1775

Conversation

patchback[bot]
Copy link

@patchback patchback bot commented Sep 27, 2023

This is a backport of PR #1768 as merged into main (d1c5f05).

SUMMARY

As per #1767 the queries to pull extra info about ALBs are hitting rate limits when there's a lot of ALBs. Unfortunately the initial list operation has limited server-side filtering capabilities (and we don't have consistent client side filtering implemented at this time).

Ensure that all of the extra queries have retries with jittered backoff enabled.

Additionally, drops a redundant describe_load_balancers call to retrieve the ip_address_type information. (added by ansible-collections/community.aws#499)

ISSUE TYPE
  • Bugfix Pull Request
COMPONENT NAME

elb_application_lb_info

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

I don't consider this a full fix for #1767 so I'm not using the "fixes".

… retries enabled (#1768)

elb_application_lb_info - ensure queries for additional ALB data have retries enabled

SUMMARY
As per #1767 the queries to pull extra info about ALBs are hitting rate limits when there's a lot of ALBs.  Unfortunately the initial list operation has limited server-side filtering capabilities (and we don't have consistent client side filtering implemented at this time).
Ensure that all of the extra queries have retries with jittered backoff enabled.
Additionally, drops a redundant describe_load_balancers call to retrieve the ip_address_type information.  (added by ansible-collections/community.aws#499)
ISSUE TYPE

Bugfix Pull Request

COMPONENT NAME
elb_application_lb_info
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
I don't consider this a full fix for #1767 so I'm not using the "fixes".

Reviewed-by: Alina Buzachis
(cherry picked from commit d1c5f05)
@softwarefactory-project-zuul
Copy link
Contributor

Build succeeded.
https://ansible.softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/buildset/55b7c49b5b8745d1a64e6661eca3d501

✔️ ansible-galaxy-importer SUCCESS in 3m 58s
✔️ build-ansible-collection SUCCESS in 12m 41s
✔️ ansible-test-splitter SUCCESS in 5m 23s
✔️ integration-amazon.aws-1 SUCCESS in 10m 36s
Skipped 43 jobs

@tremble tremble added the mergeit Merge the PR (SoftwareFactory) label Sep 28, 2023
@softwarefactory-project-zuul
Copy link
Contributor

Build succeeded (gate pipeline).
https://ansible.softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/buildset/44fe6d131622405392e8a0cfe5303bf9

✔️ ansible-galaxy-importer SUCCESS in 5m 23s
✔️ build-ansible-collection SUCCESS in 12m 43s
✔️ ansible-test-splitter SUCCESS in 5m 11s
✔️ integration-amazon.aws-1 SUCCESS in 11m 58s
Skipped 43 jobs

@softwarefactory-project-zuul softwarefactory-project-zuul bot merged commit e988216 into stable-6 Sep 28, 2023
65 checks passed
@softwarefactory-project-zuul softwarefactory-project-zuul bot deleted the patchback/backports/stable-6/d1c5f053293e6e143fbff384ad081d1794df84fa/pr-1768 branch September 28, 2023 18:03
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
mergeit Merge the PR (SoftwareFactory)
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant