Add 2.19 roadmap

[sivel]

No description provided.

[ansible-documentation-bot]

Thanks for your contribution, @sivel! Please make sure that your pull request includes sufficient and meaningful details in the description.
PR descriptions provide important context and allow other developers and our future selves to understand a change's rationale and what it actually fixes or accomplishes.

[mariolenz]

Any news on this?

It would be great to have something official about when core is planning to release alphas / betas / rcs and 2.19. Even if it isn't clear yet what's on the roadmap to implement for this version...

[oraNod]

@sivel Rather than adding to the ignored words list, you could add the entire line to https://github.com/ansible/ansible-documentation/blob/devel/.codespellignorelines

This way it will ignore the one instance in your changes but still catch misspellings of "studio".

[sivel]

This is ready for review/merge now. Let me know if you need anything further.

[oraNod]

LGTM. Thanks @sivel

I'd like to get at least one approval from a SC member before we merge.

[mariolenz]

I'd like to get at least one approval from a SC member before we merge.

I won't approve because I'm interested in seeing this merged. That is, I feel too biased to review.

But since @Andersson007 and @gundalow approved...

[oraNod]

Thanks @sivel 🚀

[samccann]

Coming in late but @oraNod - why is a core roadmap subject to SC approval?

[oraNod]

Coming in late but @oraNod - why is a core roadmap subject to SC approval?

it isn't to be fair. I guess I was aware that SC folks were looking at this PR and I didn't want to merge too soon if they had questions etc. probably should have phrased things differently.

[felixfontein]

Maybe next time do something like CC @ansible/steering-committee instead of requesting a review, then it's clear to everyone that it's not asking for approval, but simply pinging for information (and potential comments/questions) :)

[oraNod]

Maybe next time do something like CC @ansible/steering-committee instead of requesting a review, then it's clear to everyone that it's not asking for approval, but simply pinging for information (and potential comments/questions) :)

will do. apologies if I caused some misunderstanding (or if my misunderstanding caused some annoyance). I guess I've been on a bit of a streak this week.