AAP-10738 DROOLS-7475 Proposed feature for ['key'] accessor

[tarilabs]

work-in-progress as i'm volunteering to work on this e2e, so this is a quite-complete draft for the ansible-rulebook side; i'll keep posted as i will progress on drools-ansible-rulebook-integration side.

EDIT: demonstrate working locally and added e2e test as requested

JIRA: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/DROOLS-7475

referenced Pull Requests:

• AAP-10738 DROOLS-7475 Proposed feature for ['key'] accessor #539
• DROOLS-7475 Proposed feature for ['key'] accessor drools_jpy#50
• DROOLS-7475 Proposed feature for ['key'] accessor kiegroup/drools-ansible-rulebook-integration#56
• https://github.com/kiegroup/drools/pull/5333
• https://issues.redhat.com/browse/AAP-10738
• AAP-10738 DROOLS-7475 fix idx for ['key'] accessor in once_after kiegroup/drools-ansible-rulebook-integration#65
• AAP-10738 DROOLS-7475 fix idx for ['key'] accessor in once_after drools_jpy#51

[Alex-Izquierdo]

I would add e2e test cases, specially to ensure the new accessor works combined with filters like selectattr, e.g: https://github.com/ansible/ansible-rulebook/blob/main/tests/e2e/files/rulebooks/operators/test_selectattr_operator.yml

[tarilabs]

I would add e2e test cases, specially to ensure the new accessor works combined with filters like selectattr, e.g: https://github.com/ansible/ansible-rulebook/blob/main/tests/e2e/files/rulebooks/operators/test_selectattr_operator.yml

Done with 36ecfd6

Verified locally with:

Naturally because of these new e2e test will now require first the merge of:

• DROOLS-7475 Proposed feature for ['key'] accessor drools_jpy#50

[tarilabs]

@Alex-Izquierdo :

In that case can I ask for an update the of these docs for a better explanation to set properly the user expectation? Anyway this PR should include documentation to indicate the support for the new accessor.
Also, it should include it in the changelog. https://github.com/ansible/ansible-rulebook/blob/main/CHANGELOG.md

done with 68cc376

[Alex-Izquierdo]

Minor comment regarding the changelog, otherwise LGTM

[tarilabs]

required bump of drools_jpy from 51e04f9 tested, in full, locally:

[benthomasson]

I'd like to get these tests passing before approving and merging.

[tarilabs]

@benthomasson

I'd like to get these tests passing before approving and merging.

As mentioned in exchanges, the tests are failing because:

ERROR: Could not find a version that satisfies the requirement drools-jpy==0.3.6 (from ansible-rulebook) 

it needs the drools_jpy being published.