Feat: change the api layout to autoapi layout. #3708
Conversation
|
Thanks for opening a Pull Request. If you want to perform a review write a comment saying: @ansys-reviewer-bot review |
github-actions
bot
added
documentation
enhancement
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #3708 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 81.01% 81.01% -0.01%
==========================================
Files 179 179
Lines 61729 61729
==========================================
- Hits 50010 50009 -1
- Misses 11719 11720 +1 |
| def prepare_jinja_env(jinja_env) -> None: | ||
| """ | ||
| Customize the jinja env. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
| Customize the jinja env. | |
| Customize the Jinja environment. |
| Notes | ||
| ----- | ||
| See https://jinja.palletsprojects.com/en/3.0.x/api/#jinja2.Environment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
| See https://jinja.palletsprojects.com/en/3.0.x/api/#jinja2.Environment | |
| For more information on the ``environment`` class, see `High Level API | |
| <https://jinja.palletsprojects.com/en/3.0.x/api/#jinja2.Environment> in the | |
| Jinja documentation." |
|
@Revathyvenugopal162 What is the status of this PR? |
|
I added my commits and @SMoraisAnsys is expected to take over this, @SMoraisAnsys are we going to change this to autoapi? |
@Revathyvenugopal162 yes that would be the plan. |
|
I should start to work on this after the EDB API is extracted from pyaedt. This is still a work in progress. Btw, I think that Jorge developments (readthedocs/sphinx-autoapi#399) were a prerequisite for integration into pyaedt. However, they are not yet merged. @Samuelopez-ansys We can close this PR ftm, I can open it back later. Just don't remove the branch :) |
|
@SMoraisAnsys We can leave it opened, I just wanted to know the status. It is a draft so no problem at all. Thanks |
No description provided.