Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Improve performance of casting
DictionaryArray
toStringViewArray
#5871Improve performance of casting
DictionaryArray
toStringViewArray
#5871Changes from 2 commits
63db275
0308dd4
c27d548
fdebc0e
ca11706
52c28c1
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Another potential optimization is a separate loop if there are no nulls in keys (so we can avoid the branch)
Another potental idea is to use
value_offsets.windows(2)
as an iterator to avoid the bounds checks invalue_offsets
However, I think we should merge this basic PR in as is, and then add a bencmark and optimize this kenrnel as a follow on PR (if we care). I can file a ticket if @tustvold agrees
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ops, I checked in a
append_view_unchecked
.But if we do
try_append_view
, it is even slower than theunpack_dictionary
approachThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I can also move
append_view_unchecked
as a follow-up PR and potentially clean up other use cases where ByteViews are manually constructed.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
👍