GH-42017: [CI][Python][C++] Fix utf8proc detection for wheel on Windows #42022
Conversation
|
@github-actions crossbow submit wheel-windows-cp310-amd64 |
|
|
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
kou
force-pushed
the
python-wheel-windows-utf8proc
branch
from
9551459 to
6fe7fb8
Compare
|
@github-actions crossbow submit wheel-windows-cp310-amd64 |
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
kou
force-pushed
the
python-wheel-windows-utf8proc
branch
5 times, most recently
from
e261175 to
963983a
Compare
|
@github-actions crossbow submit wheel-windows-cp310-amd64 |
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
kou
force-pushed
the
python-wheel-windows-utf8proc
branch
2 times, most recently
from
35a5068 to
6fcc411
Compare
|
@github-actions crossbow submit wheel-windows-cp310-amd64 |
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
kou
force-pushed
the
python-wheel-windows-utf8proc
branch
from
6fcc411 to
980ffd5
Compare
|
@github-actions crossbow submit wheel-windows-cp310-amd64 |
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
kou
force-pushed
the
python-wheel-windows-utf8proc
branch
from
980ffd5 to
4b95f3c
Compare
|
@github-actions crossbow submit wheel-windows-* java-jars |
|
Revision: 4b95f3c Submitted crossbow builds: ursacomputing/crossbow @ actions-807f5191c1
|
|
After merging your PR, Conbench analyzed the 4 benchmarking runs that have been run so far on merge-commit 1dde399. There were no benchmark performance regressions. 🎉 The full Conbench report has more details. It also includes information about 3 possible false positives for unstable benchmarks that are known to sometimes produce them. |
Rationale for this change
utf8proc in vcpkg provides CMake package. If we use it, we don't need to care about static library name (
utf8proc.liborutf8proc_static.lib).What changes are included in this PR?
Use
unofficial-utf8procCMake package with vcpkg.Are these changes tested?
Yes.
Are there any user-facing changes?
No.
Could NOT find utf8proc (missing: utf8proc_LIB) (found suitable version "2.7.0", minimum required is "2.2.0")#42017