GH-43907: [C#][FlightRPC] Add Grpc Call Options support on Flight Client

[qmmk]

Rationale for this change

This implementation add default grpc call options on the csharp implementation FlightClient

What changes are included in this PR?

• FlightClient.cs with updated signature for all the methods accepting grpc call options
• FlightTest.cs update test to verify the raise of the right exception

Are these changes tested?

Yes, tests are added in FlightTest.cs
I've tested locally with the C++ implementation.

Are there any user-facing changes?

No is transparent for the user, following the already present documentation should be sufficient.

References

• GitHub Issue: [C#][Flight] Add Grpc Call Options support on Flight Client #43907

[github-actions]

Thanks for opening a pull request!

If this is not a minor PR. Could you open an issue for this pull request on GitHub? https://github.com/apache/arrow/issues/new/choose

Opening GitHub issues ahead of time contributes to the Openness of the Apache Arrow project.

Then could you also rename the pull request title in the following format?

GH-${GITHUB_ISSUE_ID}: [${COMPONENT}] ${SUMMARY}

or

MINOR: [${COMPONENT}] ${SUMMARY}

In the case of PARQUET issues on JIRA the title also supports:

PARQUET-${JIRA_ISSUE_ID}: [${COMPONENT}] ${SUMMARY}

See also:

• Other pull requests
• Contribution Guidelines - Contributing Overview

[github-actions]

⚠️ GitHub issue #43907 has been automatically assigned in GitHub to PR creator.

[CurtHagenlocher]

Thanks for your contribution! I think the binary-compatibility change is required; the others I leave to your discretion.

[CurtHagenlocher]

Thanks!

[conbench-apache-arrow]

After merging your PR, Conbench analyzed the 4 benchmarking runs that have been run so far on merge-commit b0786d4.

There were no benchmark performance regressions. 🎉

The full Conbench report has more details. It also includes information about 5 possible false positives for unstable benchmarks that are known to sometimes produce them.