-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Adding new metrics for SAI in nodetool tablestats command. #3742
base: trunk
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
"\tSAI SSTable indexes hit per query (mean): 0.0\n" + | ||
"\tSAI index segments hit per query (mean): 0.0\n" + | ||
"\tSAI rows filtered per query (mean): 0.0\n" + | ||
"\tSAI local total query timeouts: 0\n" + |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
nit: I guess we could just make this "local query timeouts" and leave out the "total". It's fairly obvious this is a count and not a rate...
(see also below if you do change it)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Corrected the name.
" \"average_live_cells_per_slice_last_five_minutes\" : 5.0,\n" + | ||
" \"local_read_latency_ms\" : \"1.000\",\n" + | ||
" \"sstable_count\" : 1000,\n" + | ||
" \"sai_Index_Segments_Hit\" : 0.0,\n" + |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
nit: Any way we can keep things lower case for consistency?
"\tSAI index segments hit per query (mean): 0.0\n" + | ||
"\tSAI rows filtered per query (mean): 0.0\n" + | ||
"\tSAI local total query timeouts: 0\n" + | ||
"\tSAI queryable/total indexes: null\n" + |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We should have a few of these test tables present non-zero/null values. Here are some reasonable examples:
SAI local query latency (mean): 10.000 ms
SAI post-filtering latency (mean): 1.000 ms
SAI space used (bytes): 128000000
SAI SSTable indexes hit per query (mean): 3.5
SAI index segments hit per query (mean): 4.0
SAI rows filtered per query (mean): 55.0
SAI local total query timeouts: 4
SAI queryable/total indexes: 5/5
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I added test table5 with SAI metrics.
" \"sai_queryable_total_indexes\" : \"0/0\",\n" + | ||
" \"droppable_tombstone_ratio\" : \"0.66667\",\n" + | ||
" \"compression_metadata_off_heap_memory_used\" : \"1\",\n" + | ||
" \"sai_Rows_Filtered\" : \"NaN\",\n" + |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
nit: still mixed case?
return "PerQuery"; | ||
case "PostFilteringReadLatency": | ||
case "TotalQueryTimeouts": | ||
return "TableQueryMetrics"; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We already have TableQueryMetrics.TABLE_QUERY_METRIC_TYPE
and TableStateMetrics.TABLE_STATE_METRIC_TYPE
that we can reuse here, but I feel like it would be a good time to do something similar for "IndexGroupMetrics" (in IndexGroupMetrics
) and "PerQuery" (in PerQueryMetrics
).
I wouldn't say we have to extend this to the individual metric names, as we shouldn't be changing those anyway (with them being a user-facing thing).
@@ -1892,7 +1892,66 @@ public Object getThreadPoolMetric(String pathName, String poolName, String metri | |||
} | |||
} | |||
|
|||
/** | |||
public Object getSAIIndexMetrics(String ks, String cf, String metricName) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
nit: {
on newline
} | ||
} | ||
|
||
private Object getMetricValue(String metricName, ObjectName oName) throws IOException { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
nit: {
on newline
} | ||
} | ||
|
||
private String getScopeForMetric(String metricName) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
nit: {
on newline
public long TotalQueryTimeouts; | ||
public int TotalIndexCount; | ||
public int TotalQueryableIndexCount; | ||
public String TotalQueryableIndexRatio; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
nit/style: For the above, make sure to start field names w/ lower-case letter
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
...or we could just prefix them all with sai
, which I was going to suggest anyway, given some of them are pretty general, like disk used bytes.
} | ||
else if(sortKey.equals("disk_used_bytes")) | ||
{ | ||
return sign * ((String) stx.DiskUsedBytes).compareTo((String) sty.DiskUsedBytes); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Should we use compareFileSizes()
here?
{ | ||
result = compareDoubles(stx.PostFilteringReadLatencyms, sty.PostFilteringReadLatencyms); | ||
} | ||
else if(sortKey.equals("disk_used_bytes")) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Should this be "sai_disk_used_bytes"?
} | ||
else if(sortKey.equals("TotalQueryableIndexCount")) | ||
{ | ||
return sign * ((int) stx.TotalQueryableIndexCount); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
For TotalIndexCount
and TotalQueryableIndexCount
, are we actually comparing anything here?
mpTable.put("sai_Rows_Filtered",table.RowsFiltered); | ||
mpTable.put("sai_total_query_timeouts",table.TotalQueryTimeouts); | ||
mpTable.put("total_index_count",table.TotalIndexCount); | ||
mpTable.put("queryable_index_count",table.TotalQueryableIndexCount); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
nit: We should probably prefix these two with sai_
to be safe.
} | ||
} | ||
|
||
private Object getMetricValue(String metricName, ObjectName oName) throws IOException { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
private Object getMetricValue(String metricName, ObjectName oName) throws IOException { | |
private Object getSaiMetricValue(String metricName, ObjectName oName) throws IOException { |
@@ -1892,7 +1892,66 @@ public Object getThreadPoolMetric(String pathName, String poolName, String metri | |||
} | |||
} | |||
|
|||
/** | |||
public Object getSAIIndexMetrics(String ks, String cf, String metricName) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
public Object getSAIIndexMetrics(String ks, String cf, String metricName) { | |
public Object getSaiMetric(String ks, String cf, String metricName) { |
} | ||
} | ||
|
||
private String getScopeForMetric(String metricName) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
private String getScopeForMetric(String metricName) { | |
private String getSaiMetricScope(String metricName) { |
Set<ObjectName> matchingMBeans = mbeanServerConn.queryNames(oName, null); | ||
if (matchingMBeans.isEmpty()) { | ||
return null; | ||
} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
nit: might as well just avoid the braces for this if
@@ -1892,7 +1892,66 @@ public Object getThreadPoolMetric(String pathName, String poolName, String metri | |||
} | |||
} | |||
|
|||
/** | |||
public Object getSAIIndexMetrics(String ks, String cf, String metricName) { | |||
try { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
nit: { on newline
} | ||
|
||
return getMetricValue(metricName, oName); | ||
} catch (MalformedObjectNameException e) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
nit: { on newline
} | ||
|
||
private Object getMetricValue(String metricName, ObjectName oName) throws IOException { | ||
switch (metricName) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
nit: { on newline
} | ||
|
||
private String getScopeForMetric(String metricName) { | ||
switch (metricName) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
nit: { on newline
One thing I think we want to double-check on is that we don't show these stats for system tables, as they shouldn't have SAI indexes. |
CASSANDRA-20026
Adding below metrics in
nodetool tablestats
command -