[CELEBORN-907][INFRA] The Jira Python misses our assignee when it searches users again #1832
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…rches users again
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #1832 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 46.43% 46.43%
=======================================
Files 163 163
Lines 10135 10135
Branches 934 934
=======================================
Hits 4705 4705
Misses 5118 5118
Partials 312 312 see 2 files with indirect coverage changes 📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more |
waitinfuture
approved these changes
Aug 24, 2023
|
thank you @waitinfuture |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
…
What changes were proposed in this pull request?
detailed desc can be found apache/spark@8fb799d
Why are the changes needed?
bypass upstream bug
Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
no
How was this patch tested?
I guess @pan3793 has already hit the issue when resolving CELEBORN-903 at jira side