Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[CELEBORN-1651] Support ratio threshold of unhealthy disks for excluding worker #2812

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

SteNicholas
Copy link
Member

What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Support ratio threshold of unhealthy disks for excluding worker with celeborn.master.excludeWorker.unhealthyDiskRatioThreshold.

Why are the changes needed?

We often encounter issues such as disk input/output errors in production practice. When a bad disk occurs, the worker will be maintained to decommission for repairing the machine disk. The reason is that generally the fault will be repaired in time after it is discovered. It is possible that the machine will not trigger all disk failures if it is out of warranty. It can be replaced directly when it is under warranty. If the disk fails after it is out of warranty, you need to purchase the disk yourself for replacement. At the same time, submitting the disk for repair at one time will affect the failure rate judgment of the system group and scenario. In addition, the occurrence of bad disks will bring about some management problems, such as continuous alarms, and the handling of disk failures is relatively customized.

Therefore, it's recommended to configure ratio threshold of unhealthy disks for excluding worker, which does not need to wait for all unhealthy disks to exclude corresponding worker.

Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?

Introduce celeborn.master.excludeWorker.unhealthyDiskRatioThreshold to configure max ratio of unhealthy disks for excluding worker.

How was this patch tested?

Cluster test.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant