-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.2k
add check before fencing #10059
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Draft
DaanHoogland
wants to merge
2
commits into
4.19
Choose a base branch
from
fenchCheck
base: 4.19
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Draft
add check before fencing #10059
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@DaanHoogland, my concern here is that host's status could be
Downbut in reality to be still running. With this there is an option the virtual machines started to a neighbor host to be left running on the previous one.Maybe it is better to check the OOBM status rather the host's.
Unfortunately now I don't have environment with IPMI setup and cannot test this change.
Probably here and @rp- could give some advice.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
True what @slavkap said, and now I'm a bit confused what actual the original issue was?
Wouldn't it be not just a noop if the host is already down and fence it again?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Do you mean to change this condition to something else , @slavkap ?
If it is
!Downa power operation will be performed. should it happen here as well?I am not sure if we have a OOB status retrieval possibility.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@rp-, there was a discussion about an issue with the fencing that the Host is Powered off and CS tries to shut it down again. But I've seen cases where the host could be in the down state before the IPMI tries to power it off.
@DaanHoogland, yes, I think there is an option to check the OOBM status and the condition should be changed with the result of it
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ok, it is not part of outOfBandManagementService.