-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.2k
kvm: consider Debian same as Ubuntu #10917
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: 4.20
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
@blueorangutan package |
@weizhouapache a [SL] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with KVM, XenServer and VMware SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
clgtm
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
clgtm
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## 4.20 #10917 +/- ##
============================================
- Coverage 16.13% 16.13% -0.01%
- Complexity 13239 13240 +1
============================================
Files 5656 5656
Lines 497622 497623 +1
Branches 60339 60341 +2
============================================
- Hits 80302 80299 -3
- Misses 408370 408372 +2
- Partials 8950 8952 +2
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
Packaging result [SF]: ✔️ el8 ✔️ el9 ✔️ debian ✔️ suse15. SL-JID 13511 |
@blueorangutan help |
@DaanHoogland [SL] I understand these words: "help", "hello", "thanks", "package", "test" Blessed contributors for kicking Trillian test jobs: ['rohityadavcloud', 'shwstppr', 'vishesh92', 'Pearl1594', 'harikrishna-patnala', 'nvazquez', 'DaanHoogland', 'weizhouapache', 'borisstoyanov', 'vladimirpetrov', 'kiranchavala', 'andrijapanicsb', 'NuxRo', 'rajujith', 'alexandremattioli', 'sureshanaparti', 'abh1sar', 'sudo87', 'rosi-shapeblue'] |
@blueorangutan test debian12 kvm-debian12 |
@DaanHoogland a [SL] Trillian-Jenkins test job (debian12 mgmt + kvm-debian12) has been kicked to run smoke tests |
[SF] Trillian test result (tid-13401)
|
[SF] Trillian test result (tid-13407)
|
Map<String, String> versionString = getVersionStrings(); | ||
String hostKey = "Host.OS"; | ||
if (MapUtils.isEmpty(versionString) || !versionString.containsKey(hostKey) || versionString.get(hostKey) == null) { | ||
return false; | ||
} | ||
return versionString.get(hostKey).equalsIgnoreCase("ubuntu"); | ||
return versionString.get(hostKey).equalsIgnoreCase("ubuntu") | ||
|| versionString.get(hostKey).startsWith("Debian"); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
|| versionString.get(hostKey).startsWith("Debian"); | |
|| versionString.get(hostKey).toLowerCase().startsWith("debian"); |
Description
This PR fixes the issue that UEFI is always false for debian hosts.
Types of changes
Feature/Enhancement Scale or Bug Severity
Feature/Enhancement Scale
Bug Severity
Screenshots (if appropriate):
How Has This Been Tested?
How did you try to break this feature and the system with this change?