Skip to content

UI: Fix OS Type displayed for a VM #11075

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Draft
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Draft

UI: Fix OS Type displayed for a VM #11075

wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

Pearl1594
Copy link
Contributor

Description

This PR fixes the OS type displayed for a VM

Before fix:
image

After fix:
image

Types of changes

  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • Enhancement (improves an existing feature and functionality)
  • Cleanup (Code refactoring and cleanup, that may add test cases)
  • build/CI
  • test (unit or integration test code)

Feature/Enhancement Scale or Bug Severity

Bug Severity

  • BLOCKER
  • Critical
  • Major
  • Minor
  • Trivial

Screenshots (if appropriate):

How Has This Been Tested?

How did you try to break this feature and the system with this change?

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 23, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 16.57%. Comparing base (0bd35a5) to head (5490b44).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##               main   #11075   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage     16.57%   16.57%           
  Complexity    13968    13968           
=========================================
  Files          5743     5743           
  Lines        510470   510468    -2     
  Branches      62074    62074           
=========================================
+ Hits          84615    84617    +2     
+ Misses       416393   416389    -4     
  Partials       9462     9462           
Flag Coverage Δ
uitests 3.90% <ø> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
unittests 17.47% <ø> (+<0.01%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@Pearl1594
Copy link
Contributor Author

@blueorangutan ui

@blueorangutan
Copy link

@Pearl1594 a Jenkins job has been kicked to build UI QA env. I'll keep you posted as I make progress.

@blueorangutan
Copy link

UI build: ✔️
Live QA URL: https://qa.cloudstack.cloud/simulator/pr/11075 (QA-JID-651)

@shwstppr
Copy link
Contributor

@blueorangutan ui

@blueorangutan
Copy link

@shwstppr a Jenkins job has been kicked to build UI QA env. I'll keep you posted as I make progress.

@blueorangutan
Copy link

UI build: ✔️
Live QA URL: https://qa.cloudstack.cloud/simulator/pr/11075 (QA-JID-652)

Copy link

Copy link
Contributor

@shwstppr shwstppr left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM - tested on QA server

image

image

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants