ui(locales): remove duplicates and fix typos

[jbampton]

Description

This PR mainly fixes spelling and standardizes locale files

Types of changes

• Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
• New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
• Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
• Enhancement (improves an existing feature and functionality)
• Cleanup (Code refactoring and cleanup, that may add test cases)
• Build/CI
• Test (unit or integration test code)

Feature/Enhancement Scale or Bug Severity

Feature/Enhancement Scale

• Major
• Minor

Bug Severity

• BLOCKER
• Critical
• Major
• Minor
• Trivial

Screenshots (if appropriate):

How Has This Been Tested?

How did you try to break this feature and the system with this change?

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 17.56%. Comparing base (8bbe253) to head (9d07305).

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##               main   #11872   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage     17.56%   17.56%           
- Complexity    15532    15533    +1     
=========================================
  Files          5909     5909           
  Lines        529012   529012           
  Branches      64604    64604           
=========================================
+ Hits          92913    92914    +1     
+ Misses       425652   425651    -1     
  Partials      10447    10447           

Flag	Coverage Δ
uitests	3.58% <ø> (ø)
unittests	18.63% <ø> (+<0.01%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[DaanHoogland]

@jbampton , I am abusing you PR to test if the GHA failures are gone (by rebasing) hope you don’t mind.

[DaanHoogland]

about the contents of the PR; it looks good, but I only see typoes fixed, no duplicates removed. Is that correct @jbampton ?

[jbampton]

about the contents of the PR; it looks good, but I only see typoes fixed, no duplicates removed. Is that correct @jbampton ?

message.success.asign.vm keys were removed whilst not exact duplicates the correct spelling was already there also

[DaanHoogland]

about the contents of the PR; it looks good, but I only see typoes fixed, no duplicates removed. Is that correct @jbampton ?

message.success.asign.vm keys were removed whilst not exact duplicates the correct spelling was already there also

clear, sorry I missed that

[shwstppr]

changes lgtm

There are no duplicates removed, need to update the PR title?

[DaanHoogland]

changes lgtm

There are no duplicates removed, need to update the PR title?

I didn’t see it either at first, @shwstppr

message.success.asign.vm and
message.success.assign.vm were present. The one failing an s has been removed.