Skip to content

[DOCS] List 3rd Party connector for NATS #26909

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

scottf
Copy link

@scottf scottf commented Aug 15, 2025

What is the purpose of the change

Looking for a way to include the official NATS connector somewhere. It is developed by Synadia, the primary maintainers of NATS.

Contribution Checklist

Brief change log

  • Edit of docs/content/docs/connectors/datastream/overview.md

Verifying this change

  • Trivial documentation changed. Content/intention needs approval by a human.

Does this pull request potentially affect one of the following parts:

  • Change does not affect any code.

Documentation

  • Does this pull request introduce a new feature? no

Looking for a way to include the official NATS connector somewhere. It is developed by Synadia, the primary maintainers of NATS.
@flinkbot
Copy link
Collaborator

flinkbot commented Aug 15, 2025

CI report:

Bot commands The @flinkbot bot supports the following commands:
  • @flinkbot run azure re-run the last Azure build

@@ -90,5 +90,8 @@ in order to enrich the primary datastream.
Flink offers an API for [Asynchronous I/O]({{< ref "docs/dev/datastream/operators/asyncio" >}})
to make it easier to do this kind of enrichment efficiently and robustly.

### 3rd Party Connnectors
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think this should be agreed on the dev list and appropriate wording be added to indicate that these connectors are not supported by the Flink community. Also I notice that the license is not Apache.

If this is accepted you should include the Chinese version of this change.

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

What is the process for getting the Chinese version created?

@github-actions github-actions bot added community-reviewed PR has been reviewed by the community. and removed community-reviewed PR has been reviewed by the community. labels Aug 18, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
community-reviewed PR has been reviewed by the community.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants