-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 397
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[#5051] GravitinoClient needs metalake to obtain version #5060
Conversation
Thanks for your contribution. There are a couple of unnecessary changes to the documentation here, can you please fix those? It also looks like you using an old branch, it would be best to use a new branch off the main one. |
Hello, I didn't quite understand what it meant. Can you explain it to me |
Your PR include changes to apache-hive-catalog.md and a couple of other .md documentation files, these changes are not related to the issue and should not be in the PR. Your branch is also 3 months out of date, it would be best to base your PR on a newer branch. |
Hello, I am unable to use a specific commit file specified in the submitted PR. Can you help me |
@@ -537,7 +555,7 @@ public GravitinoClient build() { | |||
metalakeName != null && !metalakeName.isEmpty(), | |||
"The argument 'metalakeName' must be a valid name"); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think the checks on metalakeName will stop the new constructor from being called if metalake name is null or empty.
* support the case that the client-side version is higher than the server-side version. | ||
* @param headers The base header for Gravitino API. | ||
* @throws NoSuchMetalakeException if the metalake with specified name does not exist. | ||
*/ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
How is the metalake set after calling this constructor?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hello, I will close this PR first and make some modifications. Later, I will open a new PR for further discussion
What changes were proposed in this pull request?
[Improvement] GravitinoClient needs metalake to obtain version
Why are the changes needed?
Fix: #5051
Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No