Skip to content

Conversation

@elijahbenizzy
Copy link
Contributor

@elijahbenizzy elijahbenizzy commented Oct 19, 2025

3.9 is EOL in october

Changes

  • adds 3.13
  • drops 3.8/3.9 provisions, tests, etc...

How I tested this

  • unit tests + CI

Notes

Checklist

  • PR has an informative and human-readable title (this will be pulled into the release notes)
  • Changes are limited to a single goal (no scope creep)
  • Code passed the pre-commit check & code is left cleaner/nicer than when first encountered.
  • Any change in functionality is tested
  • New functions are documented (with a description, list of inputs, and expected output)
  • Placeholder code is flagged / future TODOs are captured in comments
  • Project documentation has been updated if adding/changing functionality.

@cswartzvi
Copy link
Contributor

@elijahbenizzy I am very excited for this! What do you think about including freethreaded python in the actions matrix (3.13t)? Maybe we are not ready to go on record as supporting free threading, but it might be nice to keep an eye on it. What do you think?

@ShoaibG1
Copy link

ShoaibG1 commented Oct 20, 2025

@elijahbenizzy I am still using AWS Glue Python Shell jobs which are still on Python 3.9. I hope AWS does something soon. I trust the current version of Hamilton will work fine with Python 3.9? I guess I won't get future enhancements and patches until I upgrade.

Copy link
Contributor

@zilto zilto left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me!

For future work, Python 3.10 allows us to use | in typing.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

remove file from PR? I believe it's a test artifact

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

remove from PR? It's the same graph but with a different random layout

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants