-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 458
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[GLUTEN-3559][VL] Fix failing UTs with spark 3.4 #4023
Merged
Merged
Changes from 5 commits
Commits
Show all changes
13 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
b738e9d
fix and enable UTs failing with spark 3.4
46a82cd
enable more spark 3.4 UTs
4d99d83
fix scala code style
18e6d69
change the scope of slf4j dependency to test
829924c
fix assertion error
1c5880b
Merge branch 'main' into fix-34-uts
ayushi-agarwal 5949a6b
remove duplicate tests
a2512ba
enable UTs
ff21c87
Merge branch 'main' into fix-34-uts
ayushi-agarwal 8a34bce
Merge branch 'main' into fix-34-uts
ayushi-agarwal 34a3e69
Merge branch 'main' into fix-34-uts
ayushi-agarwal c3f81da
Merge branch 'main' into fix-34-uts
ayushi-agarwal 76a220e
Merge branch 'main' into fix-34-uts
ayushi-agarwal File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@ayushi-agarwal What is the reason behind rewriting this suite? Is it solely due to the addition of the configuration
SQLConf.SHUFFLE_PARTITIONS.key -> "5"
?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, the test above this is also rewritten because of it. I think now both test cases can be removed from this file as the config has been added in line 34 now.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@JkSelf I have removed it.