Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[DROOLS-7485] StoresOnly Strategy - multiple kieSession from the same… #5387

Merged

Conversation

tkobayas
Copy link
Contributor

… KieBase test

  • Parameterize multiple ksession tests to use multiple kbases or one kbase

JIRA:
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/DROOLS-7485

How to replicate CI configuration locally?

Build Chain tool does "simple" maven build(s), the builds are just Maven commands, but because the repositories relates and depends on each other and any change in API or class method could affect several of those repositories there is a need to use build-chain tool to handle cross repository builds and be sure that we always use latest version of the code for each repository.

build-chain tool is a build tool which can be used on command line locally or in Github Actions workflow(s), in case you need to change multiple repositories and send multiple dependent pull requests related with a change you can easily reproduce the same build by executing it on Github hosted environment or locally in your development environment. See local execution details to get more information about it.

How to retest this PR or trigger a specific build:
  • for pull request checks
    Please add comment: Jenkins retest this

  • for a specific pull request check
    Please add comment: Jenkins (re)run [drools|kogito-runtimes|kogito-apps|kogito-examples] tests

  • for a full downstream build

    • for jenkins job: please add comment: Jenkins run fdb
    • for github actions job: add the label run_fdb
  • a compile downstream build please add comment: Jenkins run cdb

  • a full production downstream build please add comment: Jenkins execute product fdb

  • an upstream build please add comment: Jenkins run upstream

  • for quarkus branch checks
    Run checks against Quarkus current used branch
    Please add comment: Jenkins run quarkus-branch

  • for a quarkus branch specific check
    Run checks against Quarkus current used branch
    Please add comment: Jenkins (re)run [drools|kogito-runtimes|kogito-apps|kogito-examples] quarkus-branch

  • for quarkus main checks
    Run checks against Quarkus main branch
    Please add comment: Jenkins run quarkus-main

  • for a specific quarkus main check
    Run checks against Quarkus main branch
    Please add comment: Jenkins (re)run [drools|kogito-runtimes|kogito-apps|kogito-examples] quarkus-main

  • for quarkus lts checks
    Run checks against Quarkus lts branch
    Please add comment: Jenkins run quarkus-lts

  • for a specific quarkus lts check
    Run checks against Quarkus lts branch
    Please add comment: Jenkins (re)run [drools|kogito-runtimes|kogito-apps|kogito-examples] quarkus-lts

  • for native checks
    Run native checks
    Please add comment: Jenkins run native

  • for a specific native check
    Run native checks
    Please add comment: Jenkins (re)run [drools|kogito-runtimes|kogito-apps|kogito-examples] native

  • for native lts checks
    Run native checks against quarkus lts branch
    Please add comment: Jenkins run native-lts

  • for a specific native lts check
    Run native checks against quarkus lts branch
    Please add comment: Jenkins (re)run [drools|kogito-runtimes|kogito-apps|kogito-examples] native-lts

How to backport a pull request to a different branch?

In order to automatically create a backporting pull request please add one or more labels having the following format backport-<branch-name>, where <branch-name> is the name of the branch where the pull request must be backported to (e.g., backport-7.67.x to backport the original PR to the 7.67.x branch).

NOTE: backporting is an action aiming to move a change (usually a commit) from a branch (usually the main one) to another one, which is generally referring to a still maintained release branch. Keeping it simple: it is about to move a specific change or a set of them from one branch to another.

Once the original pull request is successfully merged, the automated action will create one backporting pull request per each label (with the previous format) that has been added.

If something goes wrong, the author will be notified and at this point a manual backporting is needed.

NOTE: this automated backporting is triggered whenever a pull request on main branch is labeled or closed, but both conditions must be satisfied to get the new PR created.

Comment on lines +166 to +167
@MethodSource("strategyProviderStoresOnlyWithExplicitSafepointsAndKieBaseCache")
void multipleKieSessions_insertAdvanceInsertFailoverFire_shouldRecoverFromFailover(PersistedSessionOption.PersistenceStrategy persistenceStrategy, PersistedSessionOption.SafepointStrategy safepointStrategy, boolean useKieBaseCache) {
KieSession session1 = createSession(CEP_RULE, persistenceStrategy, safepointStrategy, useKieBaseCache, EventProcessingOption.STREAM, ClockTypeOption.PSEUDO);
KieSession session2 = createSession(CEP_RULE, persistenceStrategy, safepointStrategy, useKieBaseCache, EventProcessingOption.STREAM, ClockTypeOption.PSEUDO);
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Now we have useKieBaseCache parameter. If yes, ksessions are created from the same kbase. If no, ksessions are created from different kbases.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for the change, it looks great!

@tkobayas
Copy link
Contributor Author

Okay, will fix the conflict.

@tkobayas tkobayas force-pushed the DROOLS-7499-multi-ksession-same-kbase branch from 21fed7d to 32cc603 Compare July 12, 2023 09:31
… KieBase test

- Parameterize multiple ksession tests to use multiple kbases or one kbase
@tkobayas tkobayas force-pushed the DROOLS-7499-multi-ksession-same-kbase branch from 32cc603 to 40d6ede Compare July 12, 2023 09:44
@sonarcloud
Copy link

sonarcloud bot commented Jul 12, 2023

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!    Quality Gate passed

Bug A 0 Bugs
Vulnerability A 0 Vulnerabilities
Security Hotspot A 0 Security Hotspots
Code Smell A 0 Code Smells

No Coverage information No Coverage information
0.0% 0.0% Duplication

@kie-ci4
Copy link
Contributor

kie-ci4 commented Jul 12, 2023

(tests) - kogito-apps job #1523 was: UNSTABLE
Possible explanation: This should be test failures

Reproducer

export BUILD_MVN_OPTS_CURRENT=
build-chain build cross_pr -f 'https://raw.githubusercontent.com/kiegroup/drools/main/.ci/buildchain-config.yaml' -o 'bc' -p kiegroup/kogito-apps -u https://github.com/kiegroup/drools/pull/5387 --skipParallelCheckout

NOTE: To install the build-chain tool, please refer to https://github.com/kiegroup/github-action-build-chain#local-execution

Please look here: https://eng-jenkins-csb-business-automation.apps.ocp-c1.prod.psi.redhat.com/job/KIE/job/drools/job/main/job/pullrequest/job/drools.tests.downstream.kogito-apps/1523/display/redirect

Test results:

  • PASSED: 2778
  • FAILED: 1

Those are the test failures:

org.kie.kogito.index.infinispan.ProcessDataIndexInfinispanHttpIT.testProcessInstanceEvents 1 expectation failed.
JSON path data.UserTaskInstances[0].potentialGroups[0] doesn't match.
Expected: managers
Actual: null

Copy link
Contributor

@nprentza nprentza left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice observation.

@tkobayas
Copy link
Contributor Author

@mariofusco please merge this PR. Jenkins CIs didn't run probably because of an environment issue, but I think GHA is enough. Thanks!

@mariofusco mariofusco merged commit eeaf429 into apache:main Jul 13, 2023
8 of 9 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants