-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 209
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[KOGITO-9886] Add the support for the ProcessDefinitionDataEvent at runtime #3252
Conversation
FYI the GHA is running now, these errors are related to the test itself. |
@@ -0,0 +1,95 @@ | |||
/* | |||
* Copyright 2023 Red Hat, Inc. and/or its affiliates. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@tiagodolphine I think this header needs to be updated
@@ -0,0 +1,83 @@ | |||
package org.kie.kogito.event.process; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@tiagodolphine missing header
@@ -0,0 +1,31 @@ | |||
package org.kie.kogito.quarkus.registry; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@tiagodolphine missing header
@@ -0,0 +1,27 @@ | |||
package org.kie.kogito.event.impl; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@tiagodolphine missing header
|
||
import java.util.Map; | ||
|
||
public class NodeDefinitionEventBody { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@tiagodolphine regarding this is just a POJO and it is nott specifically the body of any event, I think it makes sense rename this class just to NodeDefinition, ProcessDefinitionNode.. or something similar. WDYT?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
+1, indeed this is not an event body, so I'll rename it, thanks.
Jenkins failed with
|
PR job Reproducerbuild-chain build full_downstream -f 'https://raw.githubusercontent.com/${AUTHOR:apache}/incubator-kie-kogito-pipelines/${BRANCH:main}/.ci/buildchain-config-pr-cdb.yaml' -o 'bc' -p apache/incubator-kie-kogito-runtimes -u #3252 --skipParallelCheckout NOTE: To install the build-chain tool, please refer to https://github.com/kiegroup/github-action-build-chain#local-execution Please look here: https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/KIE/job/kogito/job/main/job/pullrequest_jobs/job/kogito-runtimes-pr/job/PR-3252/8/display/redirect Test results:
Those are the test failures: org.kie.kogito.addon.quarkus.messaging.common.QuarkusEventThreadPoolTest.testQuarkusEventThreadPoolMultiThreadLongQueueTestexpected: not equal but was: <0> |
...s/events/process/runtime/src/main/java/org/kie/kogito/events/config/EventsRuntimeConfig.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
api/kogito-api/src/main/java/org/kie/kogito/event/EventPublisher.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
@@ -53,6 +49,9 @@ public class KafkaEventPublisher implements EventPublisher { | |||
@Value("${kogito.events.processinstances.enabled:true}") | |||
private boolean processInstancesEvents; | |||
|
|||
@Value("${kogito.events.process-definition.enabled:true}") |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
same comment here regading the naming of this property
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@tiagodolphine just a reminder, I believe this renaming is pending.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I missed this one, thanks.
...-services/src/main/java/org/kie/kogito/services/registry/ProcessDefinitionEventRegistry.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I've left some minor comments in case they can be useful.
good job.
cbde742
to
a5d8e8a
Compare
PR job Reproducerbuild-chain build full_downstream -f 'https://raw.githubusercontent.com/${AUTHOR:apache}/incubator-kie-kogito-pipelines/${BRANCH:main}/.ci/buildchain-config-pr-cdb.yaml' -o 'bc' -p apache/incubator-kie-kogito-runtimes -u #3252 --skipParallelCheckout NOTE: To install the build-chain tool, please refer to https://github.com/kiegroup/github-action-build-chain#local-execution Please look here: https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/KIE/job/kogito/job/main/job/pullrequest_jobs/job/kogito-runtimes-pr/job/PR-3252/11/display/redirect Test results:
Those are the test failures: org.kie.kogito.quarkus.workflows.PojoServiceIT.testPojoExpected size: 1 but was: 2 in: {"age"=666, "name"="javieritoPerson"} |
dddf50f
to
d7af0b0
Compare
455d655
to
c6eda2f
Compare
PR job Reproducerbuild-chain build full_downstream -f 'https://raw.githubusercontent.com/${AUTHOR:apache}/incubator-kie-kogito-pipelines/${BRANCH:main}/.ci/buildchain-config-pr-cdb.yaml' -o 'bc' -p apache/incubator-kie-kogito-runtimes -u #3252 --skipParallelCheckout NOTE: To install the build-chain tool, please refer to https://github.com/kiegroup/github-action-build-chain#local-execution Please look here: https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/KIE/job/kogito/job/main/job/pullrequest_jobs/job/kogito-runtimes-pr/job/PR-3252/23/display/redirect Test results:
Those are the test failures: org.kie.kogito.mongodb.transaction.AbstractTransactionManagerIT.testAbortCommand failed with error 246 (SnapshotUnavailable): 'Unable to read from a snapshot due to pending collection catalog changes; please retry the operation. Snapshot timestamp is Timestamp(1700585679, 0). Collection minimum is Timestamp(1700585679, 2)' on server 172.17.0.1:34002. The full response is {"errorLabels": ["TransientTransactionError"], "operationTime": {"$timestamp": {"t": 1700585678, "i": 2}}, "ok": 0.0, "errmsg": "Unable to read from a snapshot due to pending collection catalog changes; please retry the operation. Snapshot timestamp is Timestamp(1700585679, 0). Collection minimum is Timestamp(1700585679, 2)", "code": 246, "codeName": "SnapshotUnavailable", "$clusterTime": {"clusterTime": {"$timestamp": {"t": 1700585680, "i": 1}}, "signature": {"hash": {"$binary": {"base64": "AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA=", "subType": "00"}}, "keyId": 0}}}org.kie.kogito.quarkus.workflows.PojoServiceIT.testPojoExpecting value to be true but was false |
573cebc
to
fbcd5b2
Compare
…untime (apache#3252) * KOGITO-9886 Add the support for the ProcessDefinitionDataEvent at runtime
…untime (apache#3252) * KOGITO-9886 Add the support for the ProcessDefinitionDataEvent at runtime
Depends on
#3252
apache/incubator-kie-kogito-examples#1821
apache/incubator-kie-kogito-apps#1913
Many thanks for submitting your Pull Request ❤️!
Please make sure that your PR meets the following requirements:
KOGITO-XYZ Subject
[0.9.x] KOGITO-XYZ Subject
How to replicate CI configuration locally?
Build Chain tool does "simple" maven build(s), the builds are just Maven commands, but because the repositories relates and depends on each other and any change in API or class method could affect several of those repositories there is a need to use build-chain tool to handle cross repository builds and be sure that we always use latest version of the code for each repository.
build-chain tool is a build tool which can be used on command line locally or in Github Actions workflow(s), in case you need to change multiple repositories and send multiple dependent pull requests related with a change you can easily reproduce the same build by executing it on Github hosted environment or locally in your development environment. See local execution details to get more information about it.
How to retest this PR or trigger a specific build:
for pull request checks
Please add comment: Jenkins retest this
for a specific pull request check
Please add comment: Jenkins (re)run [kogito-runtimes|kogito-apps|kogito-examples] tests
for quarkus branch checks
Run checks against Quarkus current used branch
Please add comment: Jenkins run quarkus-branch
for a quarkus branch specific check
Run checks against Quarkus current used branch
Please add comment: Jenkins (re)run [kogito-runtimes|kogito-apps|kogito-examples] quarkus-branch
for quarkus main checks
Run checks against Quarkus main branch
Please add comment: Jenkins run quarkus-main
for a specific quarkus main check
Run checks against Quarkus main branch
Please add comment: Jenkins (re)run [kogito-runtimes|kogito-apps|kogito-examples] quarkus-main
for quarkus lts checks
Run checks against Quarkus lts branch
Please add comment: Jenkins run quarkus-lts
for a specific quarkus lts check
Run checks against Quarkus lts branch
Please add comment: Jenkins (re)run [kogito-runtimes|kogito-apps|kogito-examples] quarkus-lts
for native checks
Run native checks
Please add comment: Jenkins run native
for a specific native check
Run native checks
Please add comment: Jenkins (re)run [kogito-runtimes|kogito-apps|kogito-examples] native
for native lts checks
Run native checks against quarkus lts branch
Please add comment: Jenkins run native-lts
for a specific native lts check
Run native checks against quarkus lts branch
Please add comment: Jenkins (re)run [kogito-runtimes|kogito-apps|kogito-examples] native-lts
How to backport a pull request to a different branch?
In order to automatically create a backporting pull request please add one or more labels having the following format
backport-<branch-name>
, where<branch-name>
is the name of the branch where the pull request must be backported to (e.g.,backport-7.67.x
to backport the original PR to the7.67.x
branch).Once the original pull request is successfully merged, the automated action will create one backporting pull request per each label (with the previous format) that has been added.
If something goes wrong, the author will be notified and at this point a manual backporting is needed.
Quarkus-3 PR check is failing ... what to do ?
The Quarkus 3 check is applying patches from the `.ci/environments/quarkus-3/patches`.The first patch, called
0001_before_sh.patch
, is generated from Openrewrite.ci/environments/quarkus-3/quarkus3.yml
recipe. The patch is created to speed up the check. But it may be that some changes in the PR broke this patch.No panic, there is an easy way to regenerate it. You just need to comment on the PR:
and it should, after some minutes (~20/30min) apply a commit on the PR with the patch regenerated.
Other patches were generated manually. If any of it fails, you will need to manually update it... and push your changes.