Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Process test migration from v7 legacy runtime to code generation (Issue #1131) #3505

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

Abhitocode
Copy link
Contributor

Migrated some BPMN processes which are being compiled using legacy v7 to code generation approach.

The tests can be identified by referring to Activitytest.java:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-kie-kogito-runtimes/blob/main/jbpm/jbpm-tests/src/test/java/org/jbpm/bpmn2/ActivityTest.java

Issue: apache/incubator-kie-issues#1131

@elguardian
Copy link
Contributor

hi @Abhitocode few notes in here: your branch should be called as the issue in this case

"incubator-kie-issues-1131"

the subjects needs to change to

[incubator-kie-issues-1131] Process test migration from v7 legacy runtime to code generation

the rest of the comments inline

@@ -936,6 +950,7 @@ public void testBusinessRuleTaskWithContionalEvent() throws Exception {
assertThat(list).hasSize(1);
}

// The model does not have set myVar
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

avoid to add noise in here. If you want to annotate something like this won't be migrated but was want to focus attention to it. just add
@category with something like V7_ENGINE

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Okay, will make the changes.

@Abhitocode Abhitocode closed this May 16, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants