NO-ISSUE: Add license header

[jomarko]

No description provided.

[yesamer]

Why after "package" ?

[yesamer]

@jomarko This is a copied file from javax.annotation module.... not sure we can mark it with our package, please double check

[jomarko]

@yesamer hi, thank you for comments. In this message, lets discuss Why after "package".

I used https://creadur.apache.org/rat017/apache-rat/ tool for adding the headers, especially the --edit-license option. I and @jstastny-cz used this tool for licenses presence verification, so I thought using it for license addition will be not problematic.

I see your point, that it is not consistent with the rest of similar files. Now it is question, if we have other automatic way of adding headers that would be:

• compatible with the kie build
• compatible with the existing headers placement
• compatible with the apache-rat automatic checks or if we have other tool for apache licenses header checks

Situation is even more complicated, for some yaml files related to helm-chart that I thought they need to license, running pnpm format will remove headers from them.

[yesamer]

@jomarko Thank you for the explanation. It makes sense, and ultimately those Java files are part of the old editors... which should be dismissed in the future. I still believe that the Generated class shouldn't be marked with the Apache header, as copied from javax package.

[jomarko]

This will be addressed via apache/incubator-kie-issues#1613