Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Trunk #2

Open
wants to merge 583 commits into
base: amber-0.10
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Trunk #2

wants to merge 583 commits into from

Conversation

balaganeshrk
Copy link

hi

simonetripodi and others added 30 commits September 17, 2013 12:37
OLTU-115 - JWTUtils#parse() method does not support multi-lines token
OLTU-116 - JWTUtils does not have a method to serialize a JWT entity to a token

git-svn-id: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/oltu/trunk@1524010 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68
JWTUtils replaced by the JWTReader in OpenIDConnectResponse(Test)

git-svn-id: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/oltu/trunk@1524312 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68
git-svn-id: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/oltu/trunk@1524313 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68
JWTUtils replaced by the JWT(Reader|Writer) in Demos

git-svn-id: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/oltu/trunk@1524318 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68
git-svn-id: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/oltu/trunk@1524319 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68
initial checkin of new codebase

git-svn-id: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/oltu/trunk@1524395 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68
defined the JWS module version

git-svn-id: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/oltu/trunk@1524401 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68
added the JWS module in the main reactor POM

git-svn-id: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/oltu/trunk@1524403 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68
dropped unused Header#Builder inner class

git-svn-id: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/oltu/trunk@1524413 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68
removed unused imports

git-svn-id: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/oltu/trunk@1524414 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68
added signature generation/verification basic test cases

git-svn-id: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/oltu/trunk@1524655 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68
Key abstraction is an overkill, (Signing|Verifying|Symetric)Key are enough for the purpose

git-svn-id: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/oltu/trunk@1524665 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68
both signature calculation/verification need the payload in order to sign/verify the JWS

git-svn-id: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/oltu/trunk@1524671 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68
git-svn-id: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/oltu/trunk@1524701 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68
added a shortcut method to verify current JWS

git-svn-id: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/oltu/trunk@1524737 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68
added a simple test case to test to validate a signed JWS

git-svn-id: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/oltu/trunk@1524915 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68
verification method has to make sure that JWS has a payload and a signature in order to execute the verify method

git-svn-id: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/oltu/trunk@1524921 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68
asanso and others added 16 commits August 2, 2016 10:59
OSGi export should have taken the o.a.o.o2.jwt only as exporting package, so specifying it in the properties fixes it

git-svn-id: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/oltu/trunk@1780906 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68
@hubot hubot deleted the trunk branch April 28, 2017 17:06
@hubot hubot restored the trunk branch April 28, 2017 22:03
jashaj and others added 12 commits July 6, 2017 15:27
git-svn-id: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/oltu/trunk@1813250 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68
…patch kindly provided by Petr Novicky, thanks

git-svn-id: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/oltu/trunk@1813290 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68
git-svn-id: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/oltu/trunk@1813307 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants