Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

RFC-4382: Range Based Read #4382

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Mar 25, 2024
Merged

RFC-4382: Range Based Read #4382

merged 7 commits into from
Mar 25, 2024

Conversation

Xuanwo
Copy link
Member

@Xuanwo Xuanwo commented Mar 20, 2024

No description provided.

@github-actions github-actions bot requested review from ClSlaid and Young-Flash March 20, 2024 11:21
@Xuanwo Xuanwo changed the title RFC: Range based Read RFC-4382: Range based Read Mar 20, 2024
Signed-off-by: Xuanwo <[email protected]>
@Xuanwo Xuanwo requested review from tisonkun and suyanhanx March 20, 2024 11:24
@Xuanwo Xuanwo changed the title RFC-4382: Range based Read RFC-4382: Range Based Read Mar 20, 2024
Xuanwo added 2 commits March 20, 2024 19:32
Signed-off-by: Xuanwo <[email protected]>
@vertexclique
Copy link

Can we add the vectored methods like futures api? This will allow also enabling that capability, or do you want to take it as separate trait to implement like ReadVectored?

@Xuanwo
Copy link
Member Author

Xuanwo commented Mar 21, 2024

Can we add the vectored methods like futures api?

Incorporate vectorized methods, yes. However, it's unlikely for the futures API to be included as is. The existing futures API doesn't effectively support completion-based IO.

It's possile for us to add a read_at_vectored method.

Xuanwo added 2 commits March 21, 2024 11:15
Signed-off-by: Xuanwo <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Xuanwo <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Xuanwo <[email protected]>
@Xuanwo Xuanwo merged commit 627646d into main Mar 25, 2024
41 checks passed
@Xuanwo Xuanwo deleted the position-based-read branch March 25, 2024 12:54
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants