refactor: Implement RFC-3911 Deleter API

[Xuanwo]

Signed-off-by: Xuanwo [email protected]

Which issue does this PR close?

A big part of #3922

Rationale for this change

Implement RFC.

What changes are included in this PR?

This PR implements all needed things to unblock further development.

Are there any user-facing changes?

Enable users to remove a large stream of files.

[codspeed-hq]

CodSpeed Performance Report

Merging #5392 will degrade performances by 21.37%

_{Comparing deleter (6869a44) with main (f3bf1d4)}

Summary

⚡ 8 improvements
❌ 1 regressions
✅ 64 untouched benchmarks

⚠️ Please fix the performance issues or acknowledge them on CodSpeed.

Benchmarks breakdown

	Benchmark	main	deleter	Change
⚡	buffer 256 KiB * 32 chunk	183.6 ns	125.3 ns	+46.56%
⚡	buffer 256 KiB * 4 chunk	183.6 ns	125.3 ns	+46.56%
⚡	buffer 4.00 MiB * 32 chunk	183.6 ns	125.3 ns	+46.56%
⚡	buffer 4.00 MiB * 4 chunk	183.6 ns	125.3 ns	+46.56%
⚡	256 KiB * 1000k chunk	183.6 ns	154.4 ns	+18.88%
⚡	256 KiB * 100k chunk	183.6 ns	154.4 ns	+18.88%
⚡	256 KiB * 10k chunk	183.6 ns	154.4 ns	+18.88%
⚡	256 KiB * 1k chunk	212.8 ns	183.6 ns	+15.89%
❌	concurrent 8	355.2 µs	451.7 µs	-21.37%

[Xuanwo]

NOTEs to reviewer:

• Most changes are related to Access API changes
• Meaningful changes happened in operator.rs and delete.rs.

[George-Miao]

fallible?

[Xuanwo]

Fixed.

[George-Miao]

I only reviewed the core part (under oio) and not any of the services or layers. I trust you on that.

[Xuanwo]

Thank you @George-Miao for the review!