Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update Readme to clarify support status? #30

Open
brucearctor opened this issue Feb 4, 2025 · 5 comments
Open

Update Readme to clarify support status? #30

brucearctor opened this issue Feb 4, 2025 · 5 comments

Comments

@brucearctor
Copy link

the ReadME has "This is an unsupported open source project created by DataStax employees." has that at the top.

Is that accurate?

Perhaps this was created by DataStax employees is correct. BUT, as an 'active' Apache [ incubating ] project, is this really not supported? Highlighting an open source project is not supported seems like a good way to turn users/contributors away!?

Thoughts? What's the status here? Should that wording be updated/removed?

@henrikingo
Copy link
Contributor

the ReadME has "This is an unsupported open source project created by DataStax employees." has that at the top.

Is that accurate?

Hi. This is obviously not accurate. The transition to an ASF project is still not complete. We are still waiting for confirmation for the project name, which then needs to be updated everywhere. Also the license headers at the top of each file weren't updated yet.

@brucearctor
Copy link
Author

makes sense -- thanks for quick response!

I found myself digging into ASF project on the [ lol ] hunt for somewhere interesting to contribute.

This project looks quite interesting; will give it a shot as a user, and intermittently check open issues for clear opportunities to contribute. Cheers -

@henrikingo
Copy link
Contributor

Excellent! Yes, we find it interesting and revolutionary too.

Would you like me to start creating some tickets of tasks I have in mind for the future?I can do that while we continue to go through naming and license header chores...

@brucearctor
Copy link
Author

f there are issues I'd take a look and likely pick up things that are fitting. I probably need to run/test/use Hunter at first :-)

On creating issues: I play with some other OSS projects. In the event of creating issues, you might want to create a convention and use a tag to indicate 'beginner', 'starter', 'newbie', 'good-first-issue', to make it even easier for potential contributors to get moving. In addition to getting relevant contribution guide.

I am also generally happy to update docs as I go through things, as that helps others that try to follow a similar path in the future.

@Gerrrr
Copy link
Contributor

Gerrrr commented Feb 4, 2025

Hi @brucearctor !

Thank you for your interest in the project!

Please check out project documentation in https://github.com/apache/hunter/tree/master/docs. Documentation pages often reference reproducible examples from https://github.com/apache/hunter/tree/master/examples that use Docker Compose, so you can quickly set up Hunter against a test dataset.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants