Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
[improve] [pip] PIP-298 Consumer supports specifying consumption isol…
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
…ation level (#21114)

### Motivation
This pip is to implement Read Committed and Read Uncommitted isolation levels for Pulsar transactions, allow consumers to configure isolation levels during the building process.
For more details, please refer to `pip-298.md`
  • Loading branch information
hzh0425 committed Oct 24, 2023
1 parent cad4e75 commit 618aede
Showing 1 changed file with 197 additions and 0 deletions.
197 changes: 197 additions & 0 deletions pip/pip-298.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,197 @@
# Background

In the implementation of the Pulsar Transaction, each topic is configured with a `Transaction Buffer` to prevent
consumers from reading uncommitted messages, which are invisible until the transaction is committed. Transaction Buffer
works with Position (maxReadPosition) and `TxnID` Set (aborts). The broker only dispatches messages, before the
maxReadPosition, to the consumers. When the broker dispatches the messages before maxReadPosition to the consumer, the
messages sent by aborted transactions will get filtered by the Transaction Buffer.

# Motivation

Currently, Pulsar transactions do not have configurable isolation levels. By introducing isolation level configuration
for consumers, we can enhance the flexibility of Pulsar transactions.

Let's consider an example:

**System**: Financial Transaction System

**Operations**: Large volume of deposit and withdrawal operations, a
small number of transfer operations.

**Roles**:

- **Client A1**
- **Client A2**
- **User Account B1**
- **User Account B2**
- **Request Topic C**
- **Real-time Monitoring System D**
- **Business Processing System E**

**Client Operations**:

- **Withdrawal**: Client A1 decreases the deposit amount from User
Account B1 or B2.
- **Deposit**: Client A1 increases the deposit amount in User Account B1 or B2.
- **Transfer**: Client A2 decreases the deposit amount from User
Account B1 and increases it in User Account B2. Or vice versa.

**Real-time Monitoring System D**: Obtains the latest data from
Request Topic C as quickly as possible to monitor transaction data and
changes in bank reserves in real-time. This is necessary for the
timely detection of anomalies and real-time decision-making.

**Business Processing System E**: Reads data from Request Topic C,
then actually operates User Accounts B1, B2.

**User Scenario**: Client A1 sends a large number of deposit and
withdrawal requests to Request Topic C. Client A2 writes a small
number of transfer requests to Request Topic C.

In this case, Business Processing System E needs a read-committed
isolation level to ensure operation consistency and Exactly Once
semantics. The real-time monitoring system does not care if a small
number of transfer requests are incomplete (dirty data). What it
cannot tolerate is a situation where a large number of deposit and
withdrawal requests cannot be presented in real time due to a small
number of transfer requests (the current situation is that uncommitted
transaction messages can block the reading of committed transaction
messages).

In this case, it is necessary to set different isolation levels for
different consumers/subscriptions.
The uncommitted transactions do not impact actual users' bank accounts.
Business Processing System E only reads committed transactional
messages and operates users' accounts. It needs Exactly-once semantic.
Real-time Monitoring System D reads uncommitted transactional
messages. It does not need Exactly-once semantic.

They use different subscriptions and choose different isolation
levels. One needs transaction, one does not.
In general, multiple subscriptions of the same topic do not all
require transaction guarantees.
Some want low latency without the exact-once semantic guarantee, and
some must require the exactly-once guarantee.
We just provide a new option for different subscriptions.

# Goal

## In Scope

Implement Read Committed and Read Uncommitted isolation levels for Pulsar transactions. Allow consumers to configure
isolation levels during the building process.

## Out of Scope

None.

# High Level Design

Add a configuration 'subscriptionIsolationLevel' in the consumer builder to allow users to choose different transaction
isolation levels.

# Detailed Design

## Public-facing Changes

Update the PulsarConsumer builder process to include isolation level configurations for Read Committed and Read
Uncommitted.

### Before the Change

The PulsarConsumer builder process currently does not include isolation level configurations. The consumer creation
process might look like this:

```
PulsarClient client = PulsarClient.builder().serviceUrl("pulsar://localhost:6650").build();
Consumer<String> consumer = client.newConsumer(Schema.STRING)
.topic("persistent://my-tenant/my-namespace/my-topic")
.subscriptionName("my-subscription")
.subscriptionType(SubscriptionType.Shared)
.subscribe();
```

### After the Change

Update the PulsarConsumer builder process to include isolation level configurations for Read Committed and Read
Uncommitted. Introduce a new method subscriptionIsolationLevel() in the consumer builder, which accepts an enumeration
value representing the isolation level:

```
public enum SubscriptionIsolationLevel {
// Consumer can only consume all transactional messages which have been committed.
READ_COMMITTED,
// Consumer can consume all messages, even transactional messages which have been aborted.
READ_UNCOMMITTED;
}
```

Then, modify the consumer creation process to include the new isolation level configuration:

```
PulsarClient client = PulsarClient.builder().serviceUrl("pulsar://localhost:6650").build();
Consumer<String> consumer = client.newConsumer(Schema.STRING)
.topic("persistent://my-tenant/my-namespace/my-topic")
.subscriptionName("my-subscription")
.subscriptionType(SubscriptionType.Shared)
.subscriptionIsolationLevel(SubscriptionIsolationLevel.READ_COMMITTED) // Adding the isolation level configuration
.subscribe();
```

With this change, users can now choose between Read Committed and Read Uncommitted isolation levels when creating a new
consumer. If the isolationLevel() method is not called during the builder process, the default isolation level will be
Read Committed.
Note that this is a subscription dimension configuration, and all consumers under the same subscription need to be
configured with the same IsolationLevel.

## Design & Implementation Details

### Client Changes

Update the PulsarConsumer builder to accept isolation level configurations for Read Committed and Read Uncommitted levels.

In order to achieve the above goals, the following modifications need to be made:

- Added `IsolationLevel` related fields and methods in `ConsumerConfigurationData` and `ConsumerBuilderImpl` and `ConsumerImpl`

- Modify PulsarApi.CommandSubscribe, add field -- IsolationLevel

```
message CommandSubscribe {
enum IsolationLevel {
READ_COMMITTED = 0;
READ_UNCOMMITTED = 1;
}
optional IsolationLevel isolation_level = 20 [default = READ_COMMITTED];
}
```

### Broker changes

Modify the transaction buffer and dispatching mechanisms to handle messages based on the chosen isolation level.

In order to achieve the above goals, the following modifications need to be made:

- Determine in the `readMoreEntries` method of Dispatchers such as `PersistentDispatcherSingleActiveConsumer`
and `PersistentDispatcherMultipleConsumers`:

- If Subscription.isolationLevel == ReadCommitted, then MaxReadPosition = topic.getMaxReadPosition(), that is,
transactionBuffer.getMaxReadPosition()

- If Subscription.isolationLevel == ReadUnCommitted, then MaxReadPosition = PositionImpl.LATEST

- Add a new metrics `subscriptionIsolationLevel` in `SubscriptionStatsImpl`.

# Monitoring

After this PIP, Users can query the subscription stats of a topic through the admin tool, and observe the `subscriptionIsolationLevel` in the subscription stats to determine the isolation level of the subscription.

# Links

* Mailing List discussion thread: https://lists.apache.org/thread/8ny0qtp7m9qcdbvnfjdvpnkc4c5ssyld
* Mailing List voting thread: https://lists.apache.org/thread/4q1hrv466h8w9ccpf4moxt6jv1jxp1mr
* Document link: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-site/pull/712

0 comments on commit 618aede

Please sign in to comment.