TEZ-4565. TestAnalyzer subtest testInternalPreemption is flaky

[jteagles]

Occasionally, attempt comes back as 000001_2 and doesn't match

[jteagles]

This is just a test patch to induce the flaky test

[jteagles]

Second commit is try to fix the flaky test

[tez-yetus]

🎊 +1 overall

Vote	Subsystem	Runtime	Comment
+0 🆗	reexec	23m 11s	Docker mode activated.
		_ Prechecks _
+1 💚	dupname	0m 0s	No case conflicting files found.
+1 💚	@author	0m 0s	The patch does not contain any @author tags.
+1 💚	test4tests	0m 0s	The patch appears to include 1 new or modified test files.
		_ master Compile Tests _
+1 💚	mvninstall	15m 2s	master passed
+1 💚	compile	0m 27s	master passed with JDK Ubuntu-11.0.22+7-post-Ubuntu-0ubuntu222.04.1
+1 💚	compile	0m 26s	master passed with JDK Private Build-1.8.0_402-8u402-ga-2ubuntu1~22.04-b06
+1 💚	checkstyle	1m 12s	master passed
+1 💚	javadoc	0m 33s	master passed with JDK Ubuntu-11.0.22+7-post-Ubuntu-0ubuntu222.04.1
+1 💚	javadoc	0m 18s	master passed with JDK Private Build-1.8.0_402-8u402-ga-2ubuntu1~22.04-b06
+0 🆗	spotbugs	1m 27s	Used deprecated FindBugs config; considering switching to SpotBugs.
+1 💚	findbugs	1m 26s	master passed
		_ Patch Compile Tests _
+1 💚	mvninstall	0m 29s	the patch passed
+1 💚	compile	0m 20s	the patch passed with JDK Ubuntu-11.0.22+7-post-Ubuntu-0ubuntu222.04.1
+1 💚	javac	0m 20s	the patch passed
+1 💚	compile	0m 20s	the patch passed with JDK Private Build-1.8.0_402-8u402-ga-2ubuntu1~22.04-b06
+1 💚	javac	0m 20s	the patch passed
+1 💚	checkstyle	0m 11s	the patch passed
+1 💚	whitespace	0m 0s	The patch has no whitespace issues.
+1 💚	javadoc	0m 8s	the patch passed with JDK Ubuntu-11.0.22+7-post-Ubuntu-0ubuntu222.04.1
+1 💚	javadoc	0m 10s	the patch passed with JDK Private Build-1.8.0_402-8u402-ga-2ubuntu1~22.04-b06
+1 💚	findbugs	1m 12s	the patch passed
		_ Other Tests _
+1 💚	unit	2m 50s	job-analyzer in the patch passed.
+1 💚	asflicense	0m 17s	The patch does not generate ASF License warnings.
		49m 35s

Subsystem	Report/Notes
Docker	ClientAPI=1.44 ServerAPI=1.44 base: https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/tez-multibranch/job/PR-357/2/artifact/out/Dockerfile
GITHUB PR	#357
Optional Tests	dupname asflicense javac javadoc unit spotbugs findbugs checkstyle compile
uname	Linux 44860714a0db 5.15.0-94-generic #104-Ubuntu SMP Tue Jan 9 15:25:40 UTC 2024 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
Build tool	maven
Personality	personality/tez.sh
git revision	master / a1fcddb
Default Java	Private Build-1.8.0_402-8u402-ga-2ubuntu1~22.04-b06
Multi-JDK versions	/usr/lib/jvm/java-11-openjdk-amd64:Ubuntu-11.0.22+7-post-Ubuntu-0ubuntu222.04.1 /usr/lib/jvm/java-8-openjdk-amd64:Private Build-1.8.0_402-8u402-ga-2ubuntu1~22.04-b06
Test Results	https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/tez-multibranch/job/PR-357/2/testReport/
Max. process+thread count	892 (vs. ulimit of 5500)
modules	C: tez-tools/analyzers/job-analyzer U: tez-tools/analyzers/job-analyzer
Console output	https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/tez-multibranch/job/PR-357/2/console
versions	git=2.34.1 maven=3.6.3 findbugs=3.0.1
Powered by	Apache Yetus 0.12.0 https://yetus.apache.org

This message was automatically generated.

[jteagles]

@abstractdog , left this as two commits so you can see the first failed and the second succeeds. Will need squash and merge.

[abstractdog]

I'm actually fine with the patch, however, I'm a bit struggling to understand the cause
this unit test looks like describing an exact scenario (see comment above testInternalPreemption), however the underlying taskattempt ids look like a mess to me :)
I mean, the current state without the patch is:

        createStep("v1 : 00000[01]_0", CriticalPathDependency.INIT_DEPENDENCY),
        createStep("v2 : 00000[01]_0", CriticalPathDependency.DATA_DEPENDENCY),
        createStep("v3 : 000000_0", CriticalPathDependency.DATA_DEPENDENCY, 
            TaskAttemptTerminationCause.INTERNAL_PREEMPTION, null),
        createStep("v2 : 00000[01]_1", CriticalPathDependency.OUTPUT_RECREATE_DEPENDENCY),
        createStep("v1 : 000000_1", CriticalPathDependency.OUTPUT_RECREATE_DEPENDENCY,
            null, Collections.singletonList("preemption of v3")),
        createStep("v2 : 00000[01]_1", CriticalPathDependency.DATA_DEPENDENCY),
        createStep("v3 : 000000_1", CriticalPathDependency.DATA_DEPENDENCY)

this PR modifies the third occurrence of v2 to 00000[01]_[12], so if it's just sometimes 000001_2, and is 000001_1 for the rest, then the second occurrence of v2 is also weird: 00000[01]_1, so it's the same task attempt id (1)?...
is it possible?
do all of the scenarios make sense and test what we expect?