Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[YUNIKORN-2282] Missing function Stop() in shim SchedulerAPI mock classes #750

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

chenyulin0719
Copy link
Contributor

What is this PR for?

  • Add Stop() method to Shim's SchedulerAPI mock classes
  • Update yunikorn-core/yunikorn-scheduler-interface to latest in go.mod

What type of PR is it?

  • - Bug Fix
  • - Improvement
  • - Feature
  • - Documentation
  • - Hot Fix
  • - Refactoring

Todos

NA

What is the Jira issue?

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YUNIKORN-2282

How should this be tested?

make test
make e2e_test
make clean image

Screenshots (if appropriate)

NA

Questions:

NA

@craigcondit
Copy link
Contributor

This is already included in #734 which is a much larger refactor that would require a rebase if this PR is merged. Closing for now.

@craigcondit craigcondit reopened this Jan 3, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 3, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (24c699f) 69.49% compared to head (516d655) 69.52%.
Report is 4 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #750      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   69.49%   69.52%   +0.02%     
==========================================
  Files          50       50              
  Lines        7990     7990              
==========================================
+ Hits         5553     5555       +2     
+ Misses       2249     2247       -2     
  Partials      188      188              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@chia7712
Copy link
Member

chia7712 commented Jan 3, 2024

@chenyulin0719 Could you revise the PR to reduce the conflicts?

@craigcondit
Copy link
Contributor

I'll deal with the conflicts in #734.

Copy link
Member

@chia7712 chia7712 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@craigcondit I will merge it tomorrow if you have no more comments. thanks !

@chenyulin0719
Copy link
Contributor Author

Many thanks for the help form @chia7712, @craigcondit. :)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants