Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Reconcile dev after merge to main for v1.54.0 #5986

Merged
merged 20 commits into from
Sep 10, 2024
Merged

Reconcile dev after merge to main for v1.54.0 #5986

merged 20 commits into from
Sep 10, 2024

Conversation

abernix
Copy link
Member

@abernix abernix commented Sep 10, 2024

Follow-up to the v1.54.0 being officially released, bringing version bumps and changelog updates into the dev branch.

abernix and others added 20 commits August 28, 2024 20:07
We may burn additional CI costs for this release job, but that's acceptable.  Tests will still run and we'll be okay.  Linting doesn't matter.
In a recent change that added logic in `add_at_path` to remove unnecessary directives from selections, the insertion logic into the selection set had a bug. If the set did not have the key of the `OpPathElement`, we would generate a selection from the element after removing unnecessary directives. However, this was using the `entry` API, which requires that the key of the `Selection` passed to `.or_insert` matches the original. Because we removed the unnecessary directives, these keys were prone to mismatching.

Co-authored-by: Iryna Shestak <[email protected]>
This protection against introspection queries generating huge responses
was added recently in graphql-js graphql/graphql-js#4118
and ported to rust apollographql/apollo-rs#904,
but is not yet present in the graphql-js version used by router-bridge.

This disables it for now from Rust introspection, in order to match
the current state of JS introspection.

Adding this rule (in both implementations) can be revisited separately.
In particular: the depth limit is hard-coded to 3. Is that the right number?
Should it be configurable? Is the rule checking the right set of fields?
@router-perf
Copy link

router-perf bot commented Sep 10, 2024

CI performance tests

  • connectors-const - Connectors stress test that runs with a constant number of users
  • const - Basic stress test that runs with a constant number of users
  • demand-control-instrumented - A copy of the step test, but with demand control monitoring and metrics enabled
  • demand-control-uninstrumented - A copy of the step test, but with demand control monitoring enabled
  • enhanced-signature - Enhanced signature enabled
  • events - Stress test for events with a lot of users and deduplication ENABLED
  • events_big_cap_high_rate - Stress test for events with a lot of users, deduplication enabled and high rate event with a big queue capacity
  • events_big_cap_high_rate_callback - Stress test for events with a lot of users, deduplication enabled and high rate event with a big queue capacity using callback mode
  • events_callback - Stress test for events with a lot of users and deduplication ENABLED in callback mode
  • events_without_dedup - Stress test for events with a lot of users and deduplication DISABLED
  • events_without_dedup_callback - Stress test for events with a lot of users and deduplication DISABLED using callback mode
  • extended-reference-mode - Extended reference mode enabled
  • large-request - Stress test with a 1 MB request payload
  • no-tracing - Basic stress test, no tracing
  • reload - Reload test over a long period of time at a constant rate of users
  • step-jemalloc-tuning - Clone of the basic stress test for jemalloc tuning
  • step-local-metrics - Field stats that are generated from the router rather than FTV1
  • step-with-prometheus - A copy of the step test with the Prometheus metrics exporter enabled
  • step - Basic stress test that steps up the number of users over time
  • xlarge-request - Stress test with 10 MB request payload
  • xxlarge-request - Stress test with 100 MB request payload

@abernix abernix enabled auto-merge September 10, 2024 18:33
@abernix abernix merged commit 6227769 into dev Sep 10, 2024
22 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

10 participants