Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: Implement HasBiDi interface support in AppiumDriver #2250

Merged
merged 9 commits into from
Dec 16, 2024
Merged

Conversation

mykola-mokhnach
Copy link
Contributor

@mykola-mokhnach mykola-mokhnach commented Dec 13, 2024

Change list

This is the first PR in series where I would like to implement BiDi protocol support with Java client.
The Appium server and drivers only support some parts of the spec, but something is better than nothing (also not everything in the spec makes sense for our context). In time I expect the variety of events and commands to grow bigger.

Types of changes

  • No changes in production code.
  • Bugfix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)

@@ -171,54 +181,6 @@ public AppiumDriver(URL remoteSessionAddress, String platformName, String automa
setSessionId(sessionAddress.getId());
}

/**
Copy link
Contributor Author

@mykola-mokhnach mykola-mokhnach Dec 14, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

these methods were just moved to the end of the class definitions, no changes made to them

Copy link
Member

@KazuCocoa KazuCocoa left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@mykola-mokhnach mykola-mokhnach merged commit d01161d into master Dec 16, 2024
7 checks passed
@mykola-mokhnach mykola-mokhnach deleted the bidi branch December 16, 2024 07:30
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants