added vulnerable api finding cvss metrics #1463
Conversation
future-pirate-king
requested review from
Praseetha-KR,
cosmosgenius,
Yibaebi and
avzz-19
WalkthroughThe changes involve modifications to the HTML structure, CSS styling, and TypeScript interfaces related to the vulnerability analysis components. Key updates include the introduction of new classes for styling, adjustments to existing class properties, enhancements to the data model for vulnerability findings, and the addition of new translation entries for CVSS metrics to support localization. Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Deploying irenestaging with
|
| Latest commit: |
2906522
|
| Status: | ✅ Deploy successful! |
| Preview URL: | https://e24132bb.irenestaging.pages.dev |
| Branch Preview URL: | https://pd-1534-vulnerable-api-findi.irenestaging.pages.dev |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 4
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (21)
app/components/file-compare/vulnerability-details/index.scss (1)
6-6: Consider using a CSS variable for the top calculationThe change from
calc(200px - 0.5em)tocalc(198px - 0.5em)is a minor adjustment that might be addressing a specific layout issue. While this change is likely intentional, there are a few points to consider:
The adjustment is quite small (2px), which might not be noticeable in all scenarios. Ensure that this change achieves the desired visual effect across different screen sizes and resolutions.
Using magic numbers like
198pxcan make future maintenance challenging. Consider using a CSS variable for this value, which would make it easier to adjust and understand the purpose of this specific measurement.Here's a suggestion to improve maintainability:
+:root { + --file-compare-vulnerability-details-header-offset: 198px; +} .file-compare-vulnerability-details-header-wrapper { /* ... other properties ... */ - top: calc(198px - 0.5em); + top: calc(var(--file-compare-vulnerability-details-header-offset) - 0.5em); /* ... other properties ... */ }Also, consider adding a comment explaining the significance of this specific calculation to help future developers understand its purpose.
app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/findings/code-box/index.ts (1)
43-43: LGTM. Consider documenting the dual naming convention.The addition of a kebab-case identifier for the component is syntactically correct and provides flexibility in how the component can be referenced.
To improve maintainability:
- Consider adding a comment explaining why both PascalCase and kebab-case identifiers are necessary.
- Ensure that the usage of these identifiers is consistent across the codebase to avoid confusion.
Example comment:
// Dual naming convention to support both PascalCase and kebab-case usage across the codebaseapp/components/file-compare/analysis-details/index.scss (2)
12-17: LGTM with a minor suggestion for consistency.The addition of styles for
.vulnerability-finding-containerwithin.marked-passedis well-structured and uses CSS variables appropriately. This approach enhances maintainability and theming capabilities.For consistency, consider using a CSS variable for the border width as well. This would allow for easier global adjustments to border styles. For example:
.vulnerability-finding-container { background-color: var( --file-compare-analysis-details-marked-passed-vuln-finding-bg-color ); - border: 1px solid var(--file-compare-analysis-details-border-color); + border: var(--file-compare-analysis-details-border-width, 1px) solid var(--file-compare-analysis-details-border-color); }
64-84: LGTM with a suggestion for improved accessibility.The styles for
.vulnerability-finding-containerand.vulnerability-finding-descriptionare well-structured and provide a clear visual representation for vulnerability findings. The use of max dimensions with overflow handling is a good approach for containing varying amounts of content.To improve accessibility and user experience, consider adding styles for focus states. This is particularly important for keyboard navigation. Here's a suggested addition:
.vulnerability-finding-container { /* existing styles */ + &:focus-within { + outline: 2px solid var(--file-compare-analysis-details-focus-outline-color, #4a90e2); + outline-offset: 2px; + } .vulnerability-finding-description { /* existing styles */ + &:focus { + outline: none; + background-color: var(--file-compare-analysis-details-focus-bg-color, rgba(74, 144, 226, 0.1)); + } } }This addition will provide visual feedback when the container or its content receives focus, enhancing accessibility for keyboard users.
app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/findings/index.scss (2)
33-41: LGTM: Enhanced styling and positioning for analysis content titleThe changes to
.analysis-content-titleimprove both functionality and appearance:
- Sticky positioning enhances user experience by keeping the title visible while scrolling.
- Z-index ensures the title stays on top of other elements.
- Updated padding, background color, and border properties improve visual consistency.
Consider adding a transition property for smooth visual changes when the element becomes sticky:
.analysis-content-title { position: sticky; top: calc(172px + 1.5em); z-index: 1; padding: 1em; background-color: var( --file-details-vulnerability-analysis-details-background-main ); border: 1px solid var(--file-details-vulnerability-analysis-details-border-color); + transition: box-shadow 0.3s ease-in-out; }This will allow for smooth visual feedback if you decide to add a box-shadow or other visual cues when the element becomes sticky.
48-54: LGTM: New container class for analysis contentThe addition of
.analysis-content-containerprovides a consistent style for the analysis content container. The use of CSS variables for border color is good for maintainability and theming.Consider using CSS custom properties for border-width to allow for easy adjustments:
.analysis-content-container { - border-width: 0 1px 1px; + border-width: var(--analysis-content-container-border-width, 0 1px 1px); border-style: solid; border-color: var( --file-details-vulnerability-analysis-details-border-color ); }This change would allow for more flexibility in adjusting the border width without modifying the SCSS file directly.
app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/findings/custom-vulnerabilities/index.scss (3)
30-46: Consider addressing specificity for h6 marginThe
.analysis-content-titleclass is well-structured with appropriate use of sticky positioning for improved UX. Thecalc()function for thetopproperty provides flexible positioning, which is good.The use of
!importantfor theh6margin (line 44) might indicate a specificity issue. Consider refactoring the CSS to avoid using!importantby increasing the specificity of the selector or reorganizing the CSS structure.Example refactor:
.analysis-content-title { // ... other styles ... h6 { margin-bottom: 0; } }If this doesn't solve the issue, you might need to investigate where the conflicting margin is coming from and address it at its source.
Otherwise, the styling looks good and follows best practices.
60-72: Consider text overflow behavior and LGTM for container stylingThe
.vulnerability-finding-containerclass is well-defined with appropriate max dimensions and overflow properties, creating a scrollable container for varying content lengths. The use of custom CSS variables maintains consistency.The
text-overflow: clip;property (line 64) might not have the intended effect withoutwhite-space: nowrap;. If you want to control text overflow, consider the following options:
If you want to clip overflowing text:
white-space: nowrap; overflow: hidden; text-overflow: clip;If you want to show an ellipsis for overflowing text:
white-space: nowrap; overflow: hidden; text-overflow: ellipsis;If the current behavior (wrapping text and showing scrollbars) is intended, you can remove the
text-overflow: clip;line as it's not having any effect.Choose the option that best fits your design requirements.
Otherwise, the container styling looks good and follows best practices.
73-82: Consider width behavior and LGTM for description stylingThe
.vulnerability-finding-descriptionclass is well-structured with appropriate styling for readability. The use ofwhite-space: pre-line;allows for proper line breaks in the content, which is good.The
width: max-content;property (line 79) might cause horizontal scrolling if the content is too wide for its container. Consider the following alternatives based on your design requirements:
If you want the description to fit the container width:
width: 100%;If you want the description to have a flexible width but not exceed the container:
width: fit-content; max-width: 100%;If the current behavior (potentially causing horizontal scrolling) is intended, you can keep it as is, but ensure that this aligns with your UX goals.
Choose the option that best fits your design and usability requirements.
Otherwise, the description styling looks good and follows best practices.
app/utils/parse-vulnerable-api-finding.ts (2)
286-287: LGTM! Correct mapping for CVSS properties.The
updateSectionfunction has been appropriately updated to include mappings for the new CVSS properties. The associations betweencvss_baseandcvssScore, andcvss_metrics_humanizedandcvssMetricsare correct and consistent with the interface update.For improved clarity, consider adding a comment explaining the source of these key names (e.g., if they come from a specific API or data format).
const sectionMap: Record<string, VulnerabilityApiFindingSection> = { // ... existing mappings ... + // CVSS mappings (keys based on external API format) cvss_base: 'cvssScore', cvss_metrics_humanized: 'cvssMetrics', };
330-333: LGTM! Correct handling of new CVSS fields.The
updateFindingFieldfunction has been properly updated to handle the new CVSS properties. The conversion ofcvss_baseto a number and the direct assignment ofcvss_metrics_humanizedare both correct and consistent with the interface definition.For improved robustness, consider adding a check to ensure that
cvss_baseis a valid number before assigning it tocvssScore.} else if (key === 'cvss_base') { - finding.cvssScore = Number(value); + const score = Number(value); + finding.cvssScore = isNaN(score) ? null : score; } else if (key === 'cvss_metrics_humanized') { finding.cvssMetrics = value; }This change ensures that
cvssScoreis set tonullif the input cannot be converted to a valid number, maintaining consistency with the nullable type in the interface.tests/unit/utils/parse-vulnerable-api-finding-test.js (1)
236-278: LGTM: New expected object with CVSS informationThe addition of
expectedObject4is well-structured and includes all necessary fields, including the new CVSS metrics and score. This provides a comprehensive test case for the parser.However, I have a minor suggestion to improve consistency:
Consider using a parsed JSON object for the
cvssMetricsfield instead of a string representation. This would make it easier to assert specific CVSS metric values if needed in the future. Here's a suggested change:- cvssMetrics: - '\'{"version": "3.1", "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N", "attackVector": "NETWORK", "attackComplexity": "LOW", "privilegesRequired": "LOW", "userInteraction": "REQUIRED", "scope": "CHANGED", "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH", "integrityImpact": "LOW", "availabilityImpact": "NONE", "exploitCodeMaturity": "NOT_DEFINED", "remediationLevel": "NOT_DEFINED", "reportConfidence": "NOT_DEFINED", "confidentialityRequirement": "NOT_DEFINED", "integrityRequirement": "NOT_DEFINED", "availabilityRequirement": "NOT_DEFINED", "modifiedAttackVector": "NETWORK", "modifiedAttackComplexity": "LOW", "modifiedPrivilegesRequired": "LOW", "modifiedUserInteraction": "REQUIRED", "modifiedScope": "NOT_DEFINED", "modifiedConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH", "modifiedIntegrityImpact": "LOW", "modifiedAvailabilityImpact": "NONE", "baseScore": 7.6, "environmentalScore": 7.6, "temporalScore": 7.6, "baseSeverity": "HIGH", "environmentalSeverity": "HIGH", "temporalSeverity": "HIGH"}\'', + cvssMetrics: { + version: "3.1", + vectorString: "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N", + attackVector: "NETWORK", + attackComplexity: "LOW", + privilegesRequired: "LOW", + userInteraction: "REQUIRED", + scope: "CHANGED", + confidentialityImpact: "HIGH", + integrityImpact: "LOW", + availabilityImpact: "NONE", + exploitCodeMaturity: "NOT_DEFINED", + remediationLevel: "NOT_DEFINED", + reportConfidence: "NOT_DEFINED", + confidentialityRequirement: "NOT_DEFINED", + integrityRequirement: "NOT_DEFINED", + availabilityRequirement: "NOT_DEFINED", + modifiedAttackVector: "NETWORK", + modifiedAttackComplexity: "LOW", + modifiedPrivilegesRequired: "LOW", + modifiedUserInteraction: "REQUIRED", + modifiedScope: "NOT_DEFINED", + modifiedConfidentialityImpact: "HIGH", + modifiedIntegrityImpact: "LOW", + modifiedAvailabilityImpact: "NONE", + baseScore: 7.6, + environmentalScore: 7.6, + temporalScore: 7.6, + baseSeverity: "HIGH", + environmentalSeverity: "HIGH", + temporalSeverity: "HIGH" + },This change would make it easier to work with the CVSS metrics in tests and improve the overall structure of the test data.
translations/ja.json (1)
Line range hint
1-296: Consider improving overall translation file structure and consistency.While the new additions are good, there are some general improvements that could be made to enhance the maintainability and consistency of the translation file:
Naming Convention: There's inconsistency in key naming. Some use camelCase (e.g.,
acceptInvite), others use snake_case (e.g.,access_token), and some use other formats (e.g.,0sharableCredits). Consider adopting a consistent naming convention for all keys.Organization: The keys seem to be in a somewhat random order. Consider organizing them alphabetically or by feature/section to improve readability and make it easier to find and update specific translations.
English Content: Some values are in English (e.g.,
"accessPermissions": "Access permissions"). Ensure all intended Japanese translations are completed.Placeholder Consistency: For strings with placeholders, ensure a consistent format is used. For example, some use
{0}, others use named placeholders like{numYears}.Comments: Consider adding comments to provide context for complex translations or to group related translations together.
Escaping: Ensure that any strings containing special characters (like quotes) are properly escaped.
To improve the overall structure and consistency, consider implementing a linting tool for JSON translation files and establishing clear guidelines for the translation process.
translations/en.json (1)
Line range hint
282-296: Consider adding 'CVSS Metrics Labels' translation.For consistency with other CVSS-related translations, consider adding a translation for "CVSS Metrics Labels" as well. This could be useful if you need to display a title for the section containing these labels.
Here's a suggested addition:
"cvss": "CVSS", "cvssV3": "CVSSv3", "cvssExpansion": "Common Vulnerability Scoring System", "cvssMetrics": "CVSS Metrics", + "cvssMetricsLabels": "CVSS Metrics Labels", "cvssMetricsLabel": { "attackVector": "Attack Vector", "attackComplexity": "Attack Complexity", "privilegesRequired": "Privileges Required", "userInteraction": "User Interaction", "scope": "Scope", "confidentialityImpact": "Confidentiality Impact", "integrityImpact": "Integrity Impact", "availabilityImpact": "Availability Impact" },app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/findings/vulnerable-api/index.hbs (3)
15-15: Avoid using inline styles; use CSS classes insteadThe use of
{{style word-break='break-all'}}introduces inline styles, which can make the code harder to maintain and override. Consider applying a CSS class to handle theword-break: break-allproperty for better consistency and maintainability.
79-79: Typo in comment: "formating" should be "formatting"There's a minor typo in the comment. Please correct "formating" to "formatting" for clarity.
79-81: Improve readability of theeach-inblockConsider reformatting the
each-inloop to enhance readability. The current placement of the<span>tag across lines can be adjusted for better clarity. Here's a suggested refactor:app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/index.scss (3)
40-44: Consider using relative units forheightThe fixed
height: 130px;in.analysis-details-header-containermay not be responsive on different screen sizes or resolutions. Consider using relative units likeem,rem, or percentages to enhance responsiveness.Apply this diff to adjust the height:
-.analysis-details-header-container { - display: flex; - flex-direction: column; - height: 130px; - justify-content: space-between; + .analysis-details-header-container { + display: flex; + flex-direction: column; + min-height: 8.125rem; /* Assuming base font-size of 16px */ + justify-content: space-between;
Line range hint
162-171: Consider responsive dimensions for code blocksThe fixed
width: 600px;andmax-height: 400px;inpre codemay not display well on all screen sizes. To enhance responsiveness, consider using percentages or relative units.Apply this diff to improve responsiveness:
- width: 600px; - max-height: 400px; + width: 100%; + max-height: 50vh;
182-184: Review fixed widths in.analysis-content-labelSetting both
min-widthandmax-widthto250pxfixes the element's width, which may not be optimal for different screen sizes or content lengths. Consider using onlymax-widthor allowing flexibility withwidthorflexproperties.Apply this diff to allow flexibility:
-.analysis-content-label { - min-width: 250px; - max-width: 250px; + .analysis-content-label { + max-width: 250px; + flex: 1;app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/findings/vulnerable-api/index.ts (1)
127-136: Log parsing errors for better debugging and monitoringCurrently, if JSON parsing fails in the
cvssMetricsgetter, the error is silently caught, and an empty array is returned. This can make debugging difficult when issues arise with thecvssMetricsdata.Consider logging the error to aid in debugging:
} catch (error) { + this.intl.logError('Failed to parse cvssMetrics:', error); return []; }Ensure that the logging mechanism used (
intl.logErrorin this example) aligns with your application's logging practices. This will help monitor any parsing issues in production and facilitate quicker resolutions.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (19)
- app/components/file-compare/analysis-details/index.hbs (1 hunks)
- app/components/file-compare/analysis-details/index.scss (2 hunks)
- app/components/file-compare/index.scss (1 hunks)
- app/components/file-compare/vulnerability-details/index.scss (1 hunks)
- app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/findings/code-box/index.scss (0 hunks)
- app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/findings/code-box/index.ts (1 hunks)
- app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/findings/custom-vulnerabilities/index.hbs (1 hunks)
- app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/findings/custom-vulnerabilities/index.scss (1 hunks)
- app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/findings/index.hbs (1 hunks)
- app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/findings/index.scss (3 hunks)
- app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/findings/vulnerable-api/index.hbs (1 hunks)
- app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/findings/vulnerable-api/index.ts (2 hunks)
- app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/index.hbs (7 hunks)
- app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/index.scss (6 hunks)
- app/styles/_component-variables.scss (1 hunks)
- app/utils/parse-vulnerable-api-finding.ts (4 hunks)
- tests/unit/utils/parse-vulnerable-api-finding-test.js (4 hunks)
- translations/en.json (1 hunks)
- translations/ja.json (1 hunks)
💤 Files not reviewed due to no reviewable changes (1)
- app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/findings/code-box/index.scss
🔇 Additional comments (47)
app/components/file-compare/index.scss (1)
4-4: LGTM, but could you clarify the reason for this adjustment?The change from
calc(200px - 0.5em)tocalc(198px - 0.5em)looks fine from a CSS perspective. It's a minor 2px adjustment that shouldn't cause any layout issues. However, it would be helpful to understand the motivation behind this change. Is it for alignment with other UI elements or addressing a specific layout concern?app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/findings/custom-vulnerabilities/index.hbs (6)
3-4: Improved template formattingThe indentation of the conditional logic for
@analysis.isOverriddenAsPassedenhances readability. This is a positive change that aligns with best practices for template formatting.
9-22: Improved component formatting and potential layout changeThe reformatting of
AkStackandAkTypographycomponents enhances code readability, which is a positive change. However, the removal of the@gutterBottomattribute fromAkTypographymight affect the vertical spacing of the text element.Could you confirm if the removal of
@gutterBottomwas intentional? If so, please ensure that this change doesn't negatively impact the layout or spacing of the text element in the UI.
24-25: Improved template structureThe reformatting of the
divelement and the{{#each}}helper improves code readability while maintaining the existing functionality. This change aligns with best practices for template structure.
26-33: Enhanced readability of finding title renderingThe reformatting of the conditional rendering for the finding title and the restructuring of the
AkTypographycomponent improve code readability. The maintenance of data-test attributes is commendable, as it supports robust testing practices.
35-44: Improved structure for finding descriptionThe reformatting of the structure for rendering the finding description enhances code readability while maintaining existing functionality. The continued use of data-test attributes is beneficial for testing purposes.
1-44: Overall assessment: Improved code structure and readabilityThe changes in this file primarily focus on improving code formatting and structure, which enhances readability and maintainability. No functional changes were introduced, and the use of data-test attributes for testing purposes has been maintained.
The only potential concern is the removal of the
@gutterBottomattribute from theAkTypographycomponent, which may affect vertical spacing. Please ensure this change doesn't negatively impact the UI layout.These improvements align well with best practices for template formatting and structure.
app/components/file-compare/analysis-details/index.scss (1)
Line range hint
1-84: Overall, the changes enhance the visual representation of vulnerability findings.The additions to this SCSS file effectively implement styles for displaying vulnerability findings within the file comparison analysis details component. The use of CSS variables and SCSS nesting is consistent with the existing code, which maintains good practices for maintainability and theming.
The new styles provide a clear visual separation for vulnerability findings and handle potential overflow gracefully. These changes align well with the PR objective of adding vulnerable API finding CVSS metrics.
While no major issues were found, the suggestions for using a CSS variable for border width and adding focus styles would further improve consistency and accessibility.
app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/findings/index.scss (3)
12-16: LGTM: Consistent styling for passed analysisThe addition of
.analysis-content-titlewithin.analysis-overridded-passedensures visual consistency when an analysis is marked as passed. The use of CSS variables is a good practice for maintainability and theming.
22-24: LGTM: Improved code formattingThe reformatting of the border property for
.vulnerability-finding-containerimproves code readability without changing functionality.
72-74: LGTM: Improved color consistency using CSS variablesThe updates to the pagination buttons and counter container improve overall theme consistency:
- Pagination buttons now use a themed background color.
- Counter container border and background colors are now using appropriate CSS variables.
These changes enhance maintainability and make it easier to implement theme changes across the application.
Also applies to: 88-92
app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/findings/custom-vulnerabilities/index.scss (3)
2-5: LGTM: Well-structured base stylingThe
.analysis-sectionclass is well-defined with appropriate width and background color. The use of custom CSS variables for colors is a good practice for maintaining a consistent and easily updatable theme.
48-54: LGTM: Well-defined container stylingThe
.analysis-content-containerclass is well-structured with clear border definitions. The consistent use of custom CSS variables for colors maintains the theme coherence.
56-58: LGTM: Concise value stylingThe
.analysis-content-valueclass is simple and effective, setting an appropriate maximum width to control the layout.app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/findings/index.hbs (2)
Line range hint
1-110: Well-structured template with good separation of concernsThe overall structure of this template is well-organized and logical. It effectively separates the rendering of vulnerable API findings and custom vulnerable findings, using conditional statements to control their display. The inclusion of pagination for vulnerable API findings is a good UX decision, especially when dealing with multiple findings.
97-97: LGTM! Consider verifying the CSS for consistency.The addition of the local class 'analysis-content-container' to the VulnerableApi component is a good practice for component-specific styling. This change should help with the layout and presentation of the vulnerability analysis content.
To ensure the new class is properly defined and consistent with the overall design system, please run the following script:
✅ Verification successful
Verified!
The
analysis-content-containerclass is properly defined in the SCSS files and is consistently used across the Handlebars templates.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the existence and usage of the 'analysis-content-container' class # Test 1: Check if the class is defined in any CSS or SCSS files echo "Searching for 'analysis-content-container' class definition:" rg --type css --type scss 'analysis-content-container' # Test 2: Check for other usages of the class to ensure consistency echo "Searching for other usages of 'analysis-content-container' class:" rg --type hbs --type js --type ts 'analysis-content-container'Length of output: 1599
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the existence and usage of the 'analysis-content-container' class # Test 1: Check if the class is defined in any CSS or SCSS files echo "Searching for 'analysis-content-container' class definition:" rg --glob '*.css' --glob '*.scss' 'analysis-content-container' # Test 2: Check for other usages of the class to ensure consistency echo "Searching for other usages of 'analysis-content-container' class:" rg --type hbs --type js --type ts 'analysis-content-container'Length of output: 1925
app/components/file-compare/analysis-details/index.hbs (1)
93-97: Improved HTML structure for vulnerability findings display.The changes improve the semantic structure and class naming of the vulnerability findings display. Using a
<div>instead of a<span>is more appropriate for block-level content, and the new class names are more descriptive.However, please ensure the following:
- Verify that the removal of the
scrollable-boxclass doesn't affect the scrolling behavior for long descriptions. If scrolling is still needed, implement it using the new local classes.- Update the corresponding CSS file to use the new local classes
vulnerability-finding-containerandvulnerability-finding-description.To ensure the CSS has been updated accordingly, please run the following script:
app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/index.hbs (9)
7-82: Improved header structure and layoutThe changes to the header section enhance the organization and flexibility of the layout. The introduction of
AkStackcomponents and the newanalysis-details-header-rootclass contribute to a more maintainable and consistent structure. These modifications align well with best practices for component-based architectures.
Line range hint
95-113: Enhanced description section structureThe restructuring of the description section improves consistency and maintainability. The addition of wrapper divs with local classes provides better control over styling and layout. This change aligns with the overall pattern of improvements seen in the file.
Line range hint
123-180: Improved CVSS metrics section with modular componentThe restructuring of the CVSS metrics section enhances readability and maintainability. The introduction of the
FileDetails::VulnerabilityAnalysisDetails::RegulatoryContentcomponent is a positive step towards more modular and reusable code. This change aligns well with component-based architecture best practices.
196-213: Standardized compliant solution sectionThe restructuring of the compliant solution section improves consistency and maintainability. The addition of wrapper divs with local classes provides better control over styling and layout. This change follows the pattern of improvements seen throughout the file.
225-242: Standardized non-compliant code example sectionThe restructuring of the non-compliant code example section enhances consistency and maintainability. The addition of wrapper divs with local classes provides better control over styling and layout. This change aligns with the overall pattern of improvements in the file.
255-294: Enhanced regulatory content section with conditional component usageThe restructuring of the regulatory content section improves readability and maintainability. The conditional use of the
FileDetails::VulnerabilityAnalysisDetails::RegulatoryContentcomponent demonstrates a flexible approach to rendering content. This change aligns well with component-based architecture best practices and promotes code reusability.
306-323: Standardized business implication sectionThe restructuring of the business implication section enhances consistency and maintainability. The addition of wrapper divs with local classes provides better control over styling and layout. This change follows the pattern of improvements seen throughout the file.
336-349: Standardized attachments sectionThe restructuring of the attachments section improves consistency and maintainability. The addition of wrapper divs with local classes provides better control over styling and layout. This change aligns with the overall pattern of improvements in the file.
Line range hint
1-349: Overall improvements to template structure and maintainabilityThe changes made to this template file consistently enhance its structure, maintainability, and consistency. Key improvements include:
- Standardized section layouts with the introduction of wrapper divs and local classes.
- Use of
AkStackcomponents for improved layout flexibility.- Introduction of the
FileDetails::VulnerabilityAnalysisDetails::RegulatoryContentcomponent for modular content rendering.- Consistent application of styling classes across all sections.
These changes align well with best practices for component-based architectures and will likely improve the long-term maintainability of the code. No functional changes or issues were identified during the review.
app/utils/parse-vulnerable-api-finding.ts (3)
33-34: LGTM! Valuable addition of CVSS information.The addition of
cvssScoreandcvssMetricsto theVulnerableApiFindinginterface is a significant improvement. This change allows for more comprehensive vulnerability assessment by incorporating standardized CVSS data. The use of nullable types (number | nullandstring | null) is appropriate, accounting for cases where CVSS information might not be available for all findings.
69-70: LGTM! Consistent initialization of new properties.The
initializeVulnerableApiFindingfunction has been correctly updated to initialize the newcvssScoreandcvssMetricsproperties tonull. This change is consistent with the interface update and ensures that a validVulnerableApiFindingobject is created even when CVSS data is not available.
Line range hint
1-468: Overall assessment: Excellent integration of CVSS informationThe changes made to incorporate CVSS (Common Vulnerability Scoring System) information into the
VulnerableApiFindingstructure are well-implemented and consistent throughout the file. This addition enhances the vulnerability assessment capabilities of the system by providing standardized severity and impact metrics.Key improvements:
- The
VulnerableApiFindinginterface now includescvssScoreandcvssMetrics.- Initialization, parsing, and update functions have been correctly modified to handle the new properties.
- The changes maintain backwards compatibility by using nullable types, allowing for cases where CVSS data might not be available.
These modifications will significantly improve the quality and depth of vulnerability information captured by the system, enabling more informed security assessments and prioritization of remediation efforts.
tests/unit/utils/parse-vulnerable-api-finding-test.js (3)
78-79: LGTM: Addition of CVSS properties to existing test casesThe
cvssMetricsandcvssScoreproperties have been consistently added to all existing test cases withnullvalues. This is a good practice as it ensures that the parser can handle cases where CVSS information is not available.Also applies to: 108-109, 173-174, 228-229
233-234: LGTM: New test case for CORS vulnerability with CVSS metricsThe addition of
content4is a valuable enhancement to the test suite. It introduces a test case for a CORS header vulnerability, complete with CVSS metrics. This will help ensure that the parser can correctly handle and extract detailed vulnerability information, including CVSS scores and metrics.
286-286: LGTM: Updated vulnerableApiFindings arrayThe addition of the new test case (content4 and expectedObject4) to the
vulnerableApiFindingsarray is correct. This ensures that the new test case will be included in the test suite execution.translations/ja.json (3)
287-296: New CVSS metrics labels added successfully.The new
cvssMetricsLabelobject has been added with translations for various CVSS (Common Vulnerability Scoring System) metrics. This addition enhances the localization support for CVSS-related terminology in the Japanese version of the application. The translations appear to be accurate and consistent with standard CVSS terminology.However, there are a couple of suggestions for improvement:
- Consider adding a comment or description above the
cvssMetricsLabelobject to provide context for future maintainers.- Ensure that these new translations are consistent with any existing CVSS-related terms used elsewhere in the application.
Line range hint
1-296: Summary of translation file reviewOverall, the addition of the
cvssMetricsLabelobject with CVSS metric translations is a positive change that enhances the Japanese localization of the application. The translations appear accurate and consistent with CVSS terminology.However, there are opportunities for improvement in the overall structure and consistency of the translation file. Key areas to focus on include:
- Adopting a consistent naming convention for keys
- Organizing translations more systematically
- Completing any remaining English translations
- Ensuring consistent use of placeholders
- Adding comments for context where necessary
- Properly escaping special characters
Additionally, care should be taken when handling translations of sensitive terms and security-related messages to ensure they don't inadvertently disclose sensitive information or create security risks.
Consider implementing these suggestions in future updates to improve the maintainability and quality of the translation file.
Line range hint
1-296: Ensure proper handling of sensitive terms in translations.While reviewing the translations, I noticed that the file contains sensitive terms such as "API Key" and "Access Token". Although translations themselves don't typically pose direct security risks, it's important to consider the following:
Sensitive Information: Ensure that no actual sensitive data (like real API keys or tokens) is accidentally included in the translation file.
Error Messages: For security-related error messages, make sure the translations don't provide too much information that could be exploited by malicious users.
Consistency: Ensure that security-related terms are consistently translated throughout the application to avoid confusion.
Localization of Security Features: If there are translations related to security features (like two-factor authentication instructions), ensure they are clear and accurate to prevent user errors.
To double-check for any potential security issues, you can run the following script:
This script will help identify any potentially sensitive patterns and list security-related keys for manual review.
✅ Verification successful
Verification Successful: No sensitive data found in translations.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for potential sensitive data patterns in the translation file echo "Checking for potential sensitive data patterns..." grep -E "(api_?key|access_?token|secret|password|credential)" translations/ja.json # List all keys related to security features for manual review echo "Security-related keys (for manual review):" grep -E "(security|auth|login|password|token|key|secret|vulnerability|risk)" translations/ja.json | grep -oE '"[^"]+":' | tr -d ':"'Length of output: 3649
app/styles/_component-variables.scss (2)
1166-1170: New CSS custom properties added for file comparison analysis detailsThese new CSS custom properties enhance the styling options for file comparison analysis details. They provide consistent styling for code background, border radius, and primary color.
--file-compare-analysis-details-findings-code-background-color: Sets the background color for code snippets in findings.--file-compare-analysis-details-findings-border-radius: Defines the border radius for findings elements.--file-compare-analysis-details-findings-color-primary: Specifies the primary color for findings elements.These additions improve the modularity and maintainability of the styling for file comparison analysis details.
Line range hint
1-1170: Well-structured and maintainable CSS custom properties fileThe
_component-variables.scssfile is well-organized and follows best practices for maintaining a large set of CSS custom properties:
- Consistent naming conventions are used throughout the file, improving readability and maintainability.
- Variables are logically grouped by component or feature, making it easier to locate and update specific styles.
- The use of existing variables as values for new properties ensures consistency across the application and simplifies theme management.
- The file structure allows for easy addition of new properties, as demonstrated by the recent changes.
To further improve maintainability as the file grows:
- Consider splitting this file into smaller, component-specific files if it becomes too large.
- Regularly review and remove any unused variables to keep the file clean and efficient.
translations/en.json (1)
287-296: LGTM: CVSS metrics labels added correctly.The new
cvssMetricsLabelobject has been added with appropriate translations for CVSS (Common Vulnerability Scoring System) metrics. This addition enhances the application's ability to display CVSS-related information in a user-friendly manner.Here are some observations:
- The labels are clear and concise, accurately representing the CVSS metrics.
- The structure is consistent with the rest of the file, maintaining good code organization.
- All necessary CVSS v3 base metrics are included.
app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/findings/vulnerable-api/index.hbs (1)
1-89: Overall improvements enhance readability and maintainabilityThe restructuring of the template and the consistent use of components like
AkStack,AkTypography, andCodeBoxprovide a cleaner and more maintainable codebase. Great work on streamlining the layout and simplifying the rendering logic.app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/index.scss (8)
9-18: LGTM: Updated header stylingThe enhancements to
.analysis-details-headerimprove the header with additional padding and maintain the intended background color and sticky positioning. The z-index adjustment ensures proper stacking order.
19-30: LGTM: Addition of.analysis-details-header-rootThe new
.analysis-details-header-rootclass effectively encapsulates header styles such as background color, box-shadow, padding, and box-sizing, promoting better structure and maintainability.
47-48: LGTM: Adjusted margin for body containerThe update to
.analysis-details-body-containerensures consistent horizontal centering and complements the overall layout.
63-68: LGTM: Styling for overridden passed analysesThe introduction of
.analysis-content-title-containerwithin.analysis-overridded-passedapplies the correct background color, enhancing visual feedback for passed analyses.
96-99: LGTM: Added border to.analysis-section-containerThe addition of a border improves the delineation between different analysis sections, enhancing readability.
101-113: Verify mixed units intopcalculationIn
.analysis-content-title-container, thetopproperty usescalc(172px + 1.5em);Mixingpxandemunits can lead to unexpected positioning on different devices or user settings. Ensure this combination achieves the desired sticky positioning across various scenarios.
114-121: LGTM: Defined content container bordersThe styles for
.analysis-content-containerappropriately set the borders, providing a clear separation of content areas.
151-157: Confirm padding shorthand usage incodeelementsThe
padding: 1px 2px 2px;in thecodeselector sets:
padding-top: 1px;padding-rightandpadding-left: 2px;padding-bottom: 2px;Verify that this achieves the intended spacing around inline code elements.
app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/findings/vulnerable-api/index.hbs
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/findings/vulnerable-api/index.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Irene
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Project |
Irene
|
| Branch Review |
PD-1534-vulnerable-api-finding-cvss
|
| Run status |
|
| Run duration | 13m 18s |
| Commit |
|
| Committer | Sam David |
| View all properties for this run ↗︎ | |
| Test results | |
|---|---|
Failures
|
0
|
Flaky
|
0
|
Pending
|
0
|
Skipped
|
0
|
Passing
|
22
|
Upgrade your plan to view test results. | |
| View all changes introduced in this branch ↗︎ | |
future-pirate-king
force-pushed
the
PD-1534-vulnerable-api-finding-cvss
branch
from
36a3c10 to
f8b562b
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (20)
- app/components/file-compare/analysis-details/index.hbs (1 hunks)
- app/components/file-compare/analysis-details/index.scss (2 hunks)
- app/components/file-compare/index.scss (1 hunks)
- app/components/file-compare/vulnerability-details/index.scss (1 hunks)
- app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/findings/code-box/index.scss (0 hunks)
- app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/findings/code-box/index.ts (1 hunks)
- app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/findings/custom-vulnerabilities/index.hbs (1 hunks)
- app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/findings/custom-vulnerabilities/index.scss (1 hunks)
- app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/findings/index.hbs (1 hunks)
- app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/findings/index.scss (3 hunks)
- app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/findings/vulnerable-api/index.hbs (1 hunks)
- app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/findings/vulnerable-api/index.ts (2 hunks)
- app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/index.hbs (7 hunks)
- app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/index.scss (6 hunks)
- app/styles/_component-variables.scss (1 hunks)
- app/utils/parse-vulnerable-api-finding.ts (4 hunks)
- tests/integration/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/index-test.js (3 hunks)
- tests/unit/utils/parse-vulnerable-api-finding-test.js (4 hunks)
- translations/en.json (1 hunks)
- translations/ja.json (1 hunks)
💤 Files not reviewed due to no reviewable changes (1)
- app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/findings/code-box/index.scss
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (18)
- app/components/file-compare/analysis-details/index.hbs
- app/components/file-compare/analysis-details/index.scss
- app/components/file-compare/index.scss
- app/components/file-compare/vulnerability-details/index.scss
- app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/findings/code-box/index.ts
- app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/findings/custom-vulnerabilities/index.hbs
- app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/findings/custom-vulnerabilities/index.scss
- app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/findings/index.hbs
- app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/findings/index.scss
- app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/findings/vulnerable-api/index.hbs
- app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/findings/vulnerable-api/index.ts
- app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/index.hbs
- app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/index.scss
- app/styles/_component-variables.scss
- app/utils/parse-vulnerable-api-finding.ts
- tests/unit/utils/parse-vulnerable-api-finding-test.js
- translations/en.json
- translations/ja.json
🔇 Additional comments (3)
tests/integration/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/index-test.js (3)
40-42: Addition ofreqResFormatVulnerability3is consistent and correctThe new constant
reqResFormatVulnerability3has been defined consistently with the existing vulnerability constants and will aid in testing vulnerabilities with CVSS metrics.
165-166: Verify thatassert.expect(5)matches the number of assertionsPlease ensure that the number of assertions within the test matches the expected count of
5to prevent false positives or negatives in your test results.
778-904: Ensure proper parsing of CVSS metrics in the testIn the test
'it renders analysis details vulnerable api findings with cvss metrics', verify that the CVSS metrics inreqResFormatVulnerability3are correctly parsed and displayed. Ensure that the JSON string incvss_metrics_humanizedis properly escaped and parsed without errors.
tests/integration/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/index-test.js
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
future-pirate-king
force-pushed
the
PD-1534-vulnerable-api-finding-cvss
branch
from
f8b562b to
61aefaf
Compare
future-pirate-king
force-pushed
the
PD-1534-vulnerable-api-finding-cvss
branch
from
61aefaf to
bc513b2
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 8
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (19)
app/components/file-compare/analysis-details/index.scss (3)
12-17: LGTM with a minor suggestion for consistency.The addition of styles for
.vulnerability-finding-containerwithin.marked-passedis well-implemented, using CSS variables for colors and maintaining consistency with the existing code style.For consistency with other properties, consider using a CSS variable for the border width:
- border: 1px solid var(--file-compare-analysis-details-border-color); + border: var(--file-compare-analysis-details-border-width, 1px) solid var(--file-compare-analysis-details-border-color);This change would allow for easier customization of the border width in the future if needed.
64-75: Good addition, with suggestions for improvement.The new
.vulnerability-finding-containerclass is well-structured and consistent with the existing code style. However, there are a few points to consider:
The fixed dimensions (max-width and max-height) might limit responsiveness. Consider using relative units or media queries for better adaptability across different screen sizes.
The margin is set only for top and bottom. Is this intentional, or should there be horizontal margins as well?
Consider the following changes for improved responsiveness:
.vulnerability-finding-container { width: 100%; - max-width: 600px; - max-height: 300px; + max-width: min(600px, 90vw); + max-height: min(300px, 50vh); overflow: auto; text-overflow: clip; - margin: 1em 0; + margin: 1em auto; background-color: var( --file-compare-analysis-details-findings-code-background-color ); border-radius: var(--file-compare-analysis-details-findings-border-radius); }These changes will make the container more responsive while maintaining its intended size constraints.
76-84: Good addition, with minor suggestions for improvement.The
.vulnerability-finding-descriptionclass is well-implemented, providing appropriate styling for the vulnerability description. However, there are a few points to consider:
- The
width: max-contentmight cause horizontal scrolling if the content is too wide. Consider using a percentage orwidth: autoinstead.- The
line-height: normalis redundant as it's the default value and can be removed.Consider the following changes:
.vulnerability-finding-description { background-color: unset; color: var(--file-compare-analysis-details-findings-color-primary); white-space: pre-line; - width: max-content; - line-height: normal; + width: auto; padding: 0.75em; }These changes will help prevent potential horizontal scrolling issues and remove the redundant line-height declaration.
app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/findings/index.scss (1)
33-41: LGTM: Improved layout for content titleThe changes to
.analysis-content-titlesignificantly improve the user experience by making the title sticky. Good use ofcalc()for top positioning and z-index to ensure proper stacking.Consider adding a subtle box-shadow to the sticky title to enhance its visual separation when scrolling:
.analysis-content-title { position: sticky; top: calc(172px + 1.5em); z-index: 1; padding: 1em; background-color: var( --file-details-vulnerability-analysis-details-background-main ); border: 1px solid var(--file-details-vulnerability-analysis-details-border-color); + box-shadow: 0 2px 4px rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.1); }app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/findings/custom-vulnerabilities/index.scss (2)
30-46: LGTM: New sticky header with good use of CSS variablesThe new
.analysis-content-titleclass creates a sticky header, which is a good UX improvement. The use ofcalc()for thetopproperty and thez-indexsuggests careful consideration of layout. The consistent use of custom CSS variables is commendable.Consider adding a comment explaining the
172pxvalue in thecalc()function for better maintainability:top: calc(172px + 1.5em); /* 172px accounts for [explain what this value represents] */This will help future developers understand the layout dependencies.
60-84: LGTM: Improved formatting and enhanced description stylingThe reformatting of
.vulnerability-finding-containerimproves readability while maintaining functionality. The new properties for.vulnerability-finding-descriptionenhance text presentation and maintain theme consistency through the use of custom CSS variables.Consider adding a comment explaining the purpose of
width: max-content;in the description class, as this property can sometimes lead to unexpected layout behavior:width: max-content; /* Ensures the container expands to fit the content */This will help other developers understand the intent behind this property choice.
app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/findings/index.hbs (1)
97-97: LGTM! Consider consistent class naming.The addition of
local-class='analysis-content-container'to the VulnerableApi component is appropriate and aligns with the component's purpose. This change enhances the styling capabilities of the component without interfering with its existing functionality.For consistency, consider using kebab-case for all local class names. The file already uses 'analysis-content-title' and 'counter-container', so you might want to change 'analysis-content-container' to 'analysis-content-container' if it's not already in that format (it's hard to tell from this view if there's a typo or if it's already correct).
app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/index.hbs (1)
Line range hint
1-353: Improved overall template structure and consistencyThe changes significantly enhance the template's structure and consistency. The consistent use of local classes and div structures across all sections improves maintainability and styling flexibility. This refactoring will make future updates and styling changes easier to implement.
Suggestion for further improvement:
Consider extracting the repeated section structure (title container and content container) into a reusable component. This could further reduce code duplication and improve maintainability.Example of a potential reusable component:
This approach would reduce repetition and make it easier to maintain consistent section structures throughout the template.
app/utils/parse-vulnerable-api-finding.ts (3)
33-34: LGTM! Consider adding JSDoc comments for the new properties.The addition of
cvssScoreandcvssMetricsproperties to theVulnerableApiFindinginterface is a valuable enhancement for vulnerability assessment. The use ofnumber | nulltype is appropriate for cases where the score or metrics might not be available.Consider adding JSDoc comments to describe these new properties, similar to the existing properties in the interface. For example:
/** * The CVSS (Common Vulnerability Scoring System) score of the vulnerability. */ cvssScore: number | null; /** * The CVSS metrics of the vulnerability in human-readable format. */ cvssMetrics: string | null;
286-287: LGTM! Consider adding a comment explaining the snake_case usage.The
updateSectionfunction has been correctly updated to include mappings for the new CVSS properties. The use ofcvss_baseandcvss_metrics_humanizedas keys is likely due to the format of the incoming data.Consider adding a comment explaining why snake_case is used for these keys, as it differs from the camelCase convention used in the
VulnerableApiFindinginterface. This will help future maintainers understand the reason for this apparent inconsistency. For example:// Note: snake_case is used for CVSS keys to match the format of incoming data cvss_base: 'cvssScore', cvss_metrics_humanized: 'cvssMetrics',
330-333: LGTM! Consider adding error handling for CVSS score conversion.The
updateFindingFieldfunction has been correctly updated to handle the new CVSS properties. The conversion ofcvss_baseto a number and direct assignment ofcvss_metrics_humanizedas a string are appropriate.Consider adding error handling for the CVSS score conversion to improve robustness. For example:
} else if (key === 'cvss_base') { const score = Number(value); finding.cvssScore = isNaN(score) ? null : score; } else if (key === 'cvss_metrics_humanized') { finding.cvssMetrics = value || null;This change ensures that invalid CVSS scores are set to
nullinstead ofNaN, and empty strings for metrics are also set tonull.tests/unit/utils/parse-vulnerable-api-finding-test.js (1)
Line range hint
1-341: Consider adding an explanatory comment about CVSS fieldsThe changes to include CVSS (Common Vulnerability Scoring System) fields in the tests are well-implemented and improve the test coverage. To enhance maintainability, consider adding a brief comment explaining the significance of the
cvssMetricsandcvssScorefields at the beginning of the test file or where these fields are first introduced. This would help future maintainers understand the purpose and importance of these fields in the context of vulnerability assessment.translations/ja.json (1)
286-295: Consider translating CVSS metric labels to JapaneseThe newly added CVSS metric labels under
cvssMetricsLabelare currently in English. While this might be intentional, consider translating these labels into Japanese to maintain consistency with the rest of the file and improve the user experience for Japanese users.For example:
"cvssMetricsLabel": { "attackVector": "攻撃元", "attackComplexity": "攻撃条件の複雑さ", "privilegesRequired": "必要な特権レベル", "userInteraction": "ユーザー関与レベル", "scope": "スコープ", "confidentialityImpact": "機密性への影響", "integrityImpact": "完全性への影響", "availabilityImpact": "可用性への影響" }These translations are based on common Japanese translations for CVSS metrics, but you may want to adjust them to fit your specific terminology or style guide.
app/styles/_component-variables.scss (1)
1147-1151: LGTM! Consider a minor improvement for consistency.The new CSS custom properties for file comparison analysis details are well-implemented and follow the existing naming conventions. They're appropriately placed and use existing custom properties for their values, which is great for maintaining consistency.
For even better consistency, consider using the
--border-radiusvariable for the--file-compare-analysis-details-findings-border-radiusproperty, similar to how it's used in other properties:- --file-compare-analysis-details-findings-border-radius: var(--border-radius); + --file-compare-analysis-details-findings-border-radius: var(--border-radius);This change doesn't affect the functionality but aligns the new properties more closely with the existing pattern.
translations/en.json (1)
286-295: Consider adding a comment for CVSS version clarity.While the additions are correct and well-placed, it might be helpful to add a brief comment or grouping to explicitly indicate that these are CVSS v3 metrics. This could improve clarity for other developers or translators working with this file in the future.
Consider adding a comment like this before the "cvssMetricsLabel" object:
// CVSS v3 Metrics "cvssMetricsLabel": { // ... (existing translations) },app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/findings/vulnerable-api/index.hbs (1)
7-7: Inconsistent width allocations may cause layout issuesThe use of
class='w-4/12'andclass='w-9/12'for sibling components sums tow-13/12, which exceeds the full width (w-full). This may lead to layout issues where components overflow their container.Consider adjusting the width classes so that they sum up to
w-12/12(full width). For example, you could usew-4/12andw-8/12, which together makew-12/12.- class='w-9/12' + class='w-8/12'Also applies to: 16-16, 31-31, 39-39, 68-68, 76-76
app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/index.scss (3)
40-44: Use of fixed height may impact responsivenessSetting a fixed
height: 130px;on.analysis-details-header-containercould affect the layout on different screen sizes, potentially causing content overflow or excessive whitespace.Consider using
min-heightor allowing the height to adjust based on content to improve responsiveness.
151-156: Enhance code readability with consistent font sizesThe
codeelement within.analysis-static-contentis set tofont-size: 0.857rem;, while thepre codeblock usesfont-size: 1rem;. This discrepancy might affect readability.Consider using a consistent font size for code elements to maintain uniformity and improve readability.
163-164: Fixed width on code blocks may affect responsivenessSetting
width: 600px;onpre codecan cause layout issues on smaller screens or devices with varying resolutions.Consider using
max-width: 100%;or responsive units to ensure code blocks are displayed correctly across all devices.-width: 600px; +max-width: 100%;
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (20)
- app/components/file-compare/analysis-details/index.hbs (1 hunks)
- app/components/file-compare/analysis-details/index.scss (2 hunks)
- app/components/file-compare/index.scss (1 hunks)
- app/components/file-compare/vulnerability-details/index.scss (1 hunks)
- app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/findings/code-box/index.scss (0 hunks)
- app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/findings/code-box/index.ts (1 hunks)
- app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/findings/custom-vulnerabilities/index.hbs (1 hunks)
- app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/findings/custom-vulnerabilities/index.scss (1 hunks)
- app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/findings/index.hbs (1 hunks)
- app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/findings/index.scss (3 hunks)
- app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/findings/vulnerable-api/index.hbs (1 hunks)
- app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/findings/vulnerable-api/index.ts (2 hunks)
- app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/index.hbs (7 hunks)
- app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/index.scss (6 hunks)
- app/styles/_component-variables.scss (1 hunks)
- app/utils/parse-vulnerable-api-finding.ts (4 hunks)
- tests/integration/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/index-test.js (3 hunks)
- tests/unit/utils/parse-vulnerable-api-finding-test.js (4 hunks)
- translations/en.json (1 hunks)
- translations/ja.json (1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/findings/code-box/index.scss
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
- app/components/file-compare/index.scss
- app/components/file-compare/vulnerability-details/index.scss
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (39)
app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/findings/custom-vulnerabilities/index.hbs (5)
3-4: LGTM: Improved readabilityThe reformatting of the
local-classattribute enhances code readability without changing functionality. The proper indentation of the conditional expression is consistent with best practices for Handlebars templates.
9-22: LGTM: Enhanced template structureThe adjustments to the
<AkStack>and<AkTypography>components improve the overall structure and readability of the template. The conditional logic for displaying the appropriate title ("evidences" or "vulnerability") is correctly maintained.
24-24: LGTM: Added local-class for better styling controlThe addition of the
local-class='analysis-content-container'attribute improves styling modularity and control. This change is likely intentional and aligns with best practices for component-based styling.To ensure the styling change doesn't have unintended consequences, please verify the visual appearance of the component in different scenarios. You may want to check if there are any CSS module definitions for
analysis-content-containerin the corresponding stylesheet.
25-33: LGTM: Improved formatting for custom vulnerable findingsThe changes in this section enhance the readability of the code without altering its functionality. The iteration over
@customVulnerableFindingsand the conditional rendering of the finding title are correctly maintained. The use of theidxvariable in the data-test attribute is preserved, which is beneficial for testing purposes.
35-44: LGTM: Enhanced structure for vulnerability findingsThe addition of new
local-classattributes (vulnerability-finding-containerandvulnerability-finding-description) improves styling modularity and control. This change enhances the structure of the vulnerability findings section without altering its core functionality.To ensure these structural changes don't have unintended consequences:
- Verify the visual appearance of the vulnerability findings in different scenarios.
- Check if there are corresponding CSS module definitions for
vulnerability-finding-containerandvulnerability-finding-descriptionin the stylesheet.- Ensure that the layout and styling of the vulnerability finding descriptions are as intended across different screen sizes and content lengths.
app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/findings/code-box/index.ts (1)
43-43: LGTM! Enhances component accessibility in Glint environment.This addition provides an alternative, more template-friendly way to reference the
FileDetailsVulnerabilityAnalysisDetailsFindingsCodeBoxComponentin the Glint environment. The kebab-case key'file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/findings/code-box'aligns well with Ember's naming conventions for components in templates, which can improve consistency and ease of use.app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/findings/index.scss (4)
12-16: LGTM: Consistent styling for passed analysisThe addition of
.analysis-content-titlewithin.analysis-overridded-passedensures consistent styling when the analysis is marked as passed. Good use of CSS variables for maintaining a cohesive color scheme.
22-24: LGTM: Consistent border stylingThe adjustment to the border property of
.vulnerability-finding-containermaintains visual consistency. The use of CSS variables for the border color is a good practice for maintainability.
48-54: LGTM: Enhanced visual structure for contentThe introduction of
.analysis-content-containerwith specific border properties enhances the visual structure of the content. Good use of CSS variables for border color, and clever omission of the top border to avoid duplication with the sticky title.
72-74: LGTM: Improved formatting for better readabilityThe reformatting of background color and border properties for pagination buttons and
.counter-containerimproves code readability while maintaining the use of CSS variables. This approach ensures consistent styling and facilitates easier theme management.Also applies to: 88-92
app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/findings/custom-vulnerabilities/index.scss (2)
1-5: LGTM: Improved formatting and use of CSS variablesThe reformatting of the
.analysis-sectionclass improves readability. The use of a custom CSS variable for the background color is a good practice for maintaining consistent theming across the application.
48-58: LGTM: New container class and retained value classThe new
.analysis-content-containerclass provides a consistent border style using custom CSS variables, which is good for maintaining theme consistency. The.analysis-content-valueclass retains its previous styling, which is appropriate if it still serves its intended purpose.app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/findings/index.hbs (1)
Line range hint
1-114: Overall, the changes look good and the component structure is solid.The addition of the local class to the VulnerableApi component is the only change in this file, and it has been implemented correctly. The overall structure of the component, including the conditional rendering for different types of vulnerability findings and the pagination setup, remains intact and well-organized.
app/components/file-compare/analysis-details/index.hbs (1)
93-97: Improved semantic structure and class namingThe changes improve the semantic structure of the vulnerability findings display:
- Replacing
<span>with<div>is more appropriate for block-level content.- The new class names (
vulnerability-finding-containerandvulnerability-finding-description) are more descriptive and specific.These improvements enhance maintainability and styling capabilities. However, please consider the following:
- Verify that this change doesn't negatively impact the existing layout or styling.
- Ensure that corresponding CSS changes have been made for the new local classes.
- Consider adding an
aria-labelto the<div>to improve accessibility, e.g.,aria-label="Vulnerability finding details".To ensure consistency and proper styling, please run the following script:
✅ Verification successful
CSS Changes Verified and Old Structure Removed
The new CSS classes
vulnerability-finding-containerandvulnerability-finding-descriptionare present in the stylesheets, and no instances of the old structure (<span class="scrollable-box">with<pre class="pre-code">) were found.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify CSS changes and usage of new classes # Check for the new CSS classes in stylesheets echo "Searching for new CSS classes:" rg --type css 'vulnerability-finding-container|vulnerability-finding-description' # Check for other occurrences of the old structure echo "Checking for other occurrences of the old structure:" rg --type hbs '<span class=.scrollable-box.>.*?<pre class=.pre-code.>'Length of output: 1571
app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/index.hbs (9)
7-82: Improved header structure and layoutThe changes in the header section enhance the overall structure and layout. The introduction of new div elements with local classes and the use of AkStack components provide better organization and flexibility for styling. These modifications improve the maintainability and readability of the template.
95-104: Consistent structure for description sectionThe addition of new div elements with local classes for the description title and content improves the overall structure of this section. This change makes it more consistent with other sections in the template, enhancing maintainability and styling flexibility.
Line range hint
123-180: Enhanced CVSS section structure and presentationThe restructuring of the CVSS section with new div elements and local classes improves its organization. The introduction of a dedicated component for displaying CVSS metrics (
FileDetails::VulnerabilityAnalysisDetails::RegulatoryContent) enhances modularity and potential reusability. These changes contribute to better maintainability and a more consistent layout across the template.
196-213: Improved structure for compliant solution sectionThe addition of new div elements with local classes enhances the structure of the compliant solution section. This change brings it in line with the layout of other sections, contributing to a more consistent and maintainable template structure.
225-242: Consistent structure for non-compliant code example sectionThe introduction of new div elements with local classes in the non-compliant code example section improves its structure. This change aligns the section's layout with other parts of the template, enhancing overall consistency and maintainability.
255-294: Enhanced regulatory content section structure and flexibilityThe restructuring of the regulatory content section with new div elements and local classes improves its organization. The introduction of a flexible approach using either a dedicated component or a conditional block for displaying regulatory content enhances modularity and adaptability. These changes contribute to better maintainability and a more consistent layout across the template.
306-323: Improved structure for business implication sectionThe addition of new div elements with local classes enhances the structure of the business implication section. This change aligns the section's layout with other parts of the template, contributing to a more consistent and maintainable overall structure.
336-349: Consistent structure for attachments sectionThe introduction of new div elements with local classes in the attachments section improves its structure. This change brings the section's layout in line with other parts of the template, enhancing overall consistency and maintainability.
Line range hint
1-353: Summary of changes and their impactThe modifications to this Handlebars template file have significantly improved its structure, consistency, and maintainability. Key improvements include:
- Consistent use of local classes for better styling control.
- Introduction of new div elements to create a clear hierarchy in each section.
- Improved use of AkStack components for better layout management.
- Enhanced modularity with the introduction of dedicated components for specific content types (e.g., CVSS metrics, regulatory content).
These changes will make the template easier to maintain, style, and extend in the future. The consistent structure across all sections also improves the readability of the code.
The only potential area for further improvement is the extraction of the repeated section structure into a reusable component, as suggested in the previous comment. This would further enhance the template's maintainability and reduce code duplication.
Overall, these changes represent a significant positive refactoring of the template.
app/utils/parse-vulnerable-api-finding.ts (2)
69-70: LGTM! Proper initialization of new properties.The
initializeVulnerableApiFindingfunction has been correctly updated to initialize the newcvssScoreandcvssMetricsproperties tonull. This is consistent with their type definitions and appropriate for cases where CVSS information might not be available.
Line range hint
1-468: Overall, excellent addition of CVSS metrics to enhance vulnerability assessment.The changes to incorporate CVSS (Common Vulnerability Scoring System) metrics into the
VulnerableApiFindinginterface and related functions are well-implemented and valuable. These additions will significantly improve the vulnerability assessment capabilities of the system by providing standardized severity scores and metrics.Key points:
- The
VulnerableApiFindinginterface has been appropriately extended.- Initialization and update functions have been correctly modified to handle the new properties.
- The changes are consistent with the existing code structure and naming conventions.
The suggested minor improvements (adding JSDoc comments, explaining snake_case usage, and enhancing error handling) will further increase the code's clarity and robustness.
Great job on this enhancement!
tests/unit/utils/parse-vulnerable-api-finding-test.js (3)
78-79: LGTM: Addition of CVSS fields to existing test casesThe addition of
cvssMetricsandcvssScorefields withnullvalues to the existing test cases is appropriate. This change ensures that the test cases cover the new fields introduced in theparseVulnerableApiFindingfunction, even for inputs that don't contain CVSS information.Also applies to: 108-109, 173-174, 228-229
233-278: LGTM: New test case with CVSS informationThe addition of
content4andexpectedObject4is a valuable enhancement to the test suite. This new test case covers the scenario where CVSS information is present in the input, ensuring that theparseVulnerableApiFindingfunction correctly handles and parses this data. The inclusion of populatedcvssMetricsandcvssScorefields in the expected output is particularly important for verifying the correct parsing of CVSS information.
286-286: LGTM: Inclusion of new test case in parameterized testsThe addition of the new test case (content4 and expectedObject4) to the
vulnerableApiFindingsarray is correct. This ensures that the new scenario with CVSS information will be included in the parameterized tests, maintaining comprehensive test coverage.translations/ja.json (1)
Line range hint
1-295: LGTM! File structure and consistency are goodThe overall structure and consistency of the
translations/ja.jsonfile are good. The new additions are well-formatted and fit seamlessly into the existing JSON structure. Just ensure that the English CVSS metric labels are intentional, as mentioned in the previous comment.translations/en.json (2)
286-295: LGTM! New CVSS metrics translations added successfully.The new translations for CVSS (Common Vulnerability Scoring System) metrics have been added correctly. These additions enhance the localization support for displaying CVSS-related information in the user interface. The translations cover important CVSS v3 metrics such as Attack Vector, Attack Complexity, Privileges Required, User Interaction, Scope, and various Impact types.
Line range hint
1-295: Overall, the changes look good and maintain file consistency.The additions to the
translations/en.jsonfile are appropriate and well-integrated. The new CVSS metrics translations enhance the localization support for vulnerability assessment features. The file structure and formatting remain consistent, and no other issues were identified during the review.Summary of changes and suggestions:
- New CVSS metrics translations added successfully.
- Consider adding a comment to indicate CVSS version for improved clarity.
app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/findings/vulnerable-api/index.ts (5)
9-9: Addition ofElementproperty is appropriate.The addition of the
Elementproperty to the interface aligns with standard practices and enhances type safety.
116-118:cvssScoregetter is correctly implemented.The getter accurately retrieves the CVSS score from the current vulnerability.
120-137: Previous review comment regarding JSON parsing incvssMetricsremains applicable.The issue with slicing the
cvssMetricsstring before parsing persists. Please refer to the prior review comment for detailed guidance on improving the parsing logic.
139-159:cvssMetricsKeyLabelgetter effectively maps CVSS metrics for localization.The implementation correctly pairs metric keys with their localized labels, enhancing internationalization support.
161-163:hasCvssMetricsgetter is properly implemented.The getter efficiently determines the presence of CVSS metrics.
tests/integration/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/index-test.js (3)
40-42: LGTMThe addition of
reqResFormatVulnerability3enhances the test coverage for vulnerabilities with CVSS metrics and follows the existing pattern for defining test data.
167-168: Ensure the expected assertion count matches the actual number of assertionsThe call to
assert.expect(4 + this.analysis.vulnerabilityTypes.length);sets the expected number of assertions for this test. Please verify that this count accurately reflects all assertions within the test, especially after adding new assertions related to CVSS metrics.
685-727: Duplicate comment: Correct the expected counts in DOM assertionsThe issue with the counts in the DOM assertions persists. As previously noted, the counts in the following assertions may not match the actual number of elements rendered:
assert.dom('[data-test-analysisDetails-vulFinding-codeTitle]').exists({ count: 3 });assert.dom('[data-test-analysisDetails-vulFinding-code]').exists({ count: 3 });Given that there are only 2 findings in
analysis.findings, please adjust the counts to2to reflect the actual number of rendered elements.
| &.analysis-overridded-passed { | ||
| background-color: var( | ||
| --file-details-vulnerability-analysis-details-findings-custom-vulnerabilities-marked-passed-background-color | ||
| ); | ||
|
|
||
| .analysis-content-title { | ||
| padding: 0.75em 1.5em; | ||
| border-bottom: 1px solid var(--file-details-vulnerability-analysis-details-findings-custom-vulnerabilities-border-color); | ||
| background-color: var( | ||
| --file-details-vulnerability-analysis-details-findings-custom-vulnerabilities-marked-passed-background-color | ||
| ); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| h6 { | ||
| margin-bottom: 0 !important; | ||
| } | ||
| .analysis-static-content pre code, | ||
| .vulnerability-finding-container { | ||
| background-color: var( | ||
| --file-details-vulnerability-analysis-details-findings-custom-vulnerabilities-marked-passed-code-background-color | ||
| ); | ||
| border: 1px solid | ||
| var( | ||
| --file-details-vulnerability-analysis-details-findings-custom-vulnerabilities-border-color | ||
| ); | ||
| } | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fix typo in class name and LGTM for nested styles
The nested styles for the passed analysis state are well-structured and make good use of SCSS nesting. However, there's still a typo in the class name:
- &.analysis-overridded-passed {
+ &.analysis-overridden-passed {The new nested styles for .analysis-content-title and .vulnerability-finding-container are consistent with the parent class's theme and make good use of custom CSS variables.
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| &.analysis-overridded-passed { | |
| background-color: var( | |
| --file-details-vulnerability-analysis-details-findings-custom-vulnerabilities-marked-passed-background-color | |
| ); | |
| .analysis-content-title { | |
| padding: 0.75em 1.5em; | |
| border-bottom: 1px solid var(--file-details-vulnerability-analysis-details-findings-custom-vulnerabilities-border-color); | |
| background-color: var( | |
| --file-details-vulnerability-analysis-details-findings-custom-vulnerabilities-marked-passed-background-color | |
| ); | |
| } | |
| h6 { | |
| margin-bottom: 0 !important; | |
| } | |
| .analysis-static-content pre code, | |
| .vulnerability-finding-container { | |
| background-color: var( | |
| --file-details-vulnerability-analysis-details-findings-custom-vulnerabilities-marked-passed-code-background-color | |
| ); | |
| border: 1px solid | |
| var( | |
| --file-details-vulnerability-analysis-details-findings-custom-vulnerabilities-border-color | |
| ); | |
| } | |
| } | |
| &.analysis-overridden-passed { | |
| background-color: var( | |
| --file-details-vulnerability-analysis-details-findings-custom-vulnerabilities-marked-passed-background-color | |
| ); | |
| .analysis-content-title { | |
| background-color: var( | |
| --file-details-vulnerability-analysis-details-findings-custom-vulnerabilities-marked-passed-background-color | |
| ); | |
| } | |
| .analysis-static-content pre code, | |
| .vulnerability-finding-container { | |
| background-color: var( | |
| --file-details-vulnerability-analysis-details-findings-custom-vulnerabilities-marked-passed-code-background-color | |
| ); | |
| border: 1px solid | |
| var( | |
| --file-details-vulnerability-analysis-details-findings-custom-vulnerabilities-border-color | |
| ); | |
| } | |
| } |
| {{/each}} | ||
| <AkTypography | ||
| data-test-analysisDetails-vulFindingValue | ||
| {{style word-break='break-all'}} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Incorrect placement of the {{style}} helper
The {{style word-break='break-all'}} helper is placed between attributes without being assigned to any attribute, which may cause a syntax error or unintended behavior.
To fix this issue, move the {{style}} helper into the style attribute:
<AkTypography
data-test-analysisDetails-vulFindingValue
- {{style word-break='break-all'}}
class='w-9/12'
@fontWeight='medium'
+ style={{style word-break='break-all'}}
>📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| {{style word-break='break-all'}} | |
| <AkTypography | |
| data-test-analysisDetails-vulFindingValue | |
| class='w-9/12' | |
| @fontWeight='medium' | |
| style={{style word-break='break-all'}} | |
| > |
| padding-bottom: 1.5em; | ||
| background-color: var( | ||
| --file-details-vulnerability-analysis-details-background-main | ||
| ); | ||
|
|
||
| box-shadow: var( | ||
| --file-details-vulnerability-analysis-details-header-box-shadow | ||
| --file-details-vulnerability-analysis-details-background-light | ||
| ); | ||
|
|
||
| padding: 1.75em 1.5em; | ||
| box-sizing: border-box; | ||
| position: sticky; | ||
| top: -0.5em; | ||
|
|
||
| z-index: calc( | ||
| var(--file-details-vulnerability-analysis-details-zIndex) - 1 | ||
| ); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Potential issue with negative top value in position: sticky
Using a negative top value with position: sticky may lead to inconsistent behavior across different browsers. Negative values can cause the sticky element to not function as expected.
Consider revising top: -0.5em; to top: 0; or adjusting the layout to achieve the desired positioning without negative offsets.
| .analysis-section-container { | ||
| border: 1px solid | ||
| var(--file-details-vulnerability-analysis-details-divider-color); | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consolidate border styles for consistency
The .analysis-section-container class introduces a border with specific styling. Ensure that border styles are consistent across similar containers to maintain a uniform appearance.
If multiple containers use the same border styling, consider creating a shared class or mixin to apply the border styles consistently.
| .analysis-content-title-container { | ||
| width: 100%; | ||
| padding: 1em; | ||
| position: sticky; | ||
| top: calc(172px + 1.5em); | ||
| z-index: 1; | ||
| background-color: var( | ||
| --file-details-vulnerability-analysis-details-background-main | ||
| ); | ||
| border: 1px solid | ||
| var(--file-details-vulnerability-analysis-details-divider-color); | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review top calculation with mixed units
The top: calc(172px + 1.5em); mixes px and em units within the calc function. This can lead to unpredictable results due to the relative nature of em units.
Consider converting all values to the same unit for consistency. For example:
-top: calc(172px + 1.5em);
+top: calc(172px + 24px); // Assuming 1.5em equals 24px at the current font sizeOr use relative units entirely:
-top: calc(172px + 1.5em);
+top: calc(10.75em + 1.5em); // Convert 172px to em based on the font sizeCommittable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
| .analysis-content-label { | ||
| min-width: 250px; | ||
| max-width: 250px; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Remaining .analysis-content-title References Found
The following SCSS files still contain the .analysis-content-title class. Please update these to .analysis-content-label to ensure consistent styling:
app/components/file-compare/analysis-details/index.scssapp/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/index.scssapp/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/findings/index.scssapp/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/findings/custom-vulnerabilities/index.scssapp/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/findings/code-box/index.scss
🔗 Analysis chain
Ensure consistent renaming of .analysis-content-title to .analysis-content-label
The class .analysis-content-title has been renamed to .analysis-content-label. Please verify that all references to .analysis-content-title in the codebase have been updated to prevent styling issues.
Run the following script to find any remaining occurrences of the old class name:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for '.analysis-content-title' in SCSS, HTML, and TypeScript files
rg --type scss,html,ts --fixed-strings '.analysis-content-title'
Length of output: 101
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for '.analysis-content-title' in SCSS, HTML, and TypeScript files
rg --type scss --type html --type ts --fixed-strings '.analysis-content-title'
Length of output: 107
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for '.analysis-content-title' in SCSS, HTML, and TypeScript files using glob patterns
rg --glob '*.scss' --glob '*.html' --glob '*.ts' --fixed-strings '.analysis-content-title'
Length of output: 986
app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/findings/vulnerable-api/index.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| assert.dom('[data-test-analysisDetails-vulFindingValue]').exists({ | ||
| count: 3, | ||
| }); | ||
| assert | ||
| .dom('[data-test-analysisDetails-vulFinding-codeTitle]') | ||
| .exists({ count: 5 }); | ||
|
|
||
| const values = findAll('[data-test-analysisDetails-vulFindingValue]'); | ||
| assert | ||
| .dom('[data-test-analysisDetails-vulFinding-code]') | ||
| .exists({ count: 5 }); | ||
|
|
||
| assert | ||
| .dom(values[0]) | ||
| .containsText( | ||
| 'https://token.safebrowsing.apple:443/api/v1/google.json' | ||
| ); | ||
| assert.dom('[data-test-analysisDetails-vulFindingValue]').exists({ | ||
| count: 5, | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| const values = findAll('[data-test-analysisDetails-vulFindingValue]'); | ||
|
|
||
| assert | ||
| .dom(values[0]) | ||
| .containsText( | ||
| 'https://catalog.api.speechify.com:443/subscriptions/plans/default' | ||
| ); | ||
|
|
||
| assert.dom(values[1]).containsText('PATCH'); | ||
|
|
||
| assert.dom(values[2]).containsText('HIGH'); | ||
|
|
||
| assert.dom(values[3]).containsText('HIGH'); | ||
|
|
||
| assert.dom(values[1]).containsText('LOW'); | ||
| assert | ||
| .dom(values[4]) | ||
| .containsText( | ||
| 'CORS header vulnerability found.. Make sure that the header is not assigned a wildcard character.' | ||
| ); | ||
|
|
||
| assert | ||
| .dom('[data-test-analysisDetails-vulFinding-pagination-prevBtn]') | ||
| .isDisabled(); | ||
|
|
||
| assert | ||
| .dom('[data-test-analysisDetails-vulFinding-pagination-nextBtn]') | ||
| .isDisabled(); | ||
|
|
||
| assert | ||
| .dom('[data-test-analysisDetails-vulFindingCvssLabel]') | ||
| .hasText('t:cvssV3:()'); | ||
|
|
||
| assert | ||
| .dom('[data-test-analysisDetails-vulFindingCvssValue]') | ||
| .hasText('7.6'); | ||
|
|
||
| assert | ||
| .dom('[data-test-analysisDetails-vulFindingCvssMetricsLabel]') | ||
| .hasText('t:cvssMetrics:()'); | ||
|
|
||
| const metricsLabelValues = [ | ||
| { label: 't:cvssMetricsLabel.attackComplexity:()', value: 'LOW' }, | ||
| { label: 't:cvssMetricsLabel.attackVector:()', value: 'NETWORK' }, | ||
| { label: 't:cvssMetricsLabel.availabilityImpact:()', value: 'NONE' }, | ||
| { label: 't:cvssMetricsLabel.confidentialityImpact:()', value: 'HIGH' }, | ||
| { label: 't:cvssMetricsLabel.integrityImpact:()', value: 'LOW' }, | ||
| { label: 't:cvssMetricsLabel.privilegesRequired:()', value: 'LOW' }, | ||
| { label: 't:cvssMetricsLabel.scope:()', value: 'CHANGED' }, | ||
| { label: 't:cvssMetricsLabel.userInteraction:()', value: 'REQUIRED' }, | ||
| ]; | ||
|
|
||
| metricsLabelValues.forEach((metric) => { | ||
| const container = find( | ||
| `[data-test-analysisDetails-vulFindingCvssMetric="${metric.label}"]` | ||
| ); | ||
|
|
||
| assert | ||
| .dom(values[2]) | ||
| .containsText('TRACE is enabled in the webserver configuration'); | ||
| } else { | ||
| .dom( | ||
| '[data-test-analysisDetails-vulFindingCvssMetricLabel]', | ||
| container | ||
| ) | ||
| .hasText(metric.label); | ||
|
|
||
| assert | ||
| .dom('[data-test-analysisDetails-vulnerabilityContainer]') | ||
| .doesNotExist(); | ||
| } | ||
| .dom( | ||
| '[data-test-analysisDetails-vulFindingCvssMetricValue]', | ||
| container | ||
| ) | ||
| .hasText(metric.value); | ||
| }); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider refactoring repetitive test code to improve maintainability
The new test it renders analysis details vulnerable api findings with cvss metrics contains setup and assertion logic that is similar to other tests in the file. To enhance maintainability and reduce code duplication, consider:
- Abstracting common setup steps: Extract repeated setup code into helper functions or a shared
beforeEachhook. - Creating reusable assertion helpers: Encapsulate common assertion sequences into functions to make the tests more concise.
- Leveraging test parameterization: Use
test.eachor similar techniques to run the same test logic with different data inputs.
future-pirate-king
force-pushed
the
PD-1534-vulnerable-api-finding-cvss
branch
from
bc513b2 to
e387db6
Compare
future-pirate-king
force-pushed
the
PD-1534-vulnerable-api-finding-cvss
branch
from
e387db6 to
2906522
Compare
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (6)
app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/findings/vulnerable-api/index.hbs (2)
47-83: LGTM: CVSS metrics section implemented correctly with a minor suggestionThe new CVSS metrics section is well-implemented. It follows the existing pattern in the file, uses appropriate components for layout and styling, and includes data-test attributes for testing. The iteration over metrics is correct, and the use of translations for labels is good for internationalization.
For consistency with the CVSS score section, consider wrapping the "CVSS Metrics" label (lines 50-56) in an
AkStackcomponent. This would align the styling with the other sections:
Line range hint
12-12: Fix placement of the{{style}}helperThere's still an issue with the placement of the
{{style}}helper, as mentioned in a previous review comment. The helper is placed between attributes without being assigned to any attribute, which may cause a syntax error or unintended behavior.To fix this, move the
{{style}}helper into thestyleattribute:<AkTypography data-test-analysisDetails-vulFindingValue - {{style word-break='break-all'}} class='w-9/12' @fontWeight='medium' + style={{style word-break='break-all'}} >tests/unit/utils/parse-vulnerable-api-finding-test.js (3)
233-278: LGTM: New test case for CVSS metricsThe addition of
content4andexpectedObject4enhances the test coverage by including a scenario with CVSS metrics. The expected object correctly parses and structures the information from the content, including the CVSS data.Consider adding a comment above
content4to briefly explain that this test case covers CVSS metrics, which would improve the readability and maintainability of the test suite.
Line range hint
288-301: Consider adding specific assertions for CVSS fieldsWhile the existing test implementation can handle the new test case, it might be beneficial to add specific assertions for the new CVSS fields. This would ensure that these fields are correctly parsed and populated when present.
Consider adding the following assertions within the test.each block:
assert.strictEqual( typeof results[index].cvssScore, typeof finding.cvssScore, `cvssScore type mismatch for finding ${index}` ); if (finding.cvssScore !== null) { assert.strictEqual( results[index].cvssScore, finding.cvssScore, `cvssScore value mismatch for finding ${index}` ); } assert.strictEqual( results[index].cvssMetrics, finding.cvssMetrics, `cvssMetrics mismatch for finding ${index}` );These assertions will verify that the CVSS fields are correctly parsed and populated when present in the input content.
Line range hint
303-324: Consider adding a test case for isVulnerableApiFinding with CVSS informationWhile the isVulnerableApiFinding function doesn't seem to be directly affected by the addition of CVSS fields, it would be beneficial to add a test case that includes CVSS information. This would ensure that the function continues to work correctly with content that includes these new fields.
Consider adding the following test case:
test('should return true if content contains CVSS information', (assert) => { const contentWithCVSS = ` severity: high confidence: medium method: GET cvss: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N cvss_base: 7.5 `; const result = isVulnerableApiFinding(contentWithCVSS); assert.true(result); });This additional test case will verify that the isVulnerableApiFinding function correctly identifies content with CVSS information as a vulnerable API finding.
tests/integration/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/index-test.js (1)
778-904: New test case for CVSS metrics rendering looks comprehensiveThe test case thoroughly checks the rendering of CVSS metrics, including the overall score and individual metrics. It follows the structure of existing tests and provides good coverage for the new functionality.
Consider adding a test for the case where CVSS metrics are not present, to ensure the component handles that scenario gracefully.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
- app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/findings/vulnerable-api/index.hbs (1 hunks)
- app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/findings/vulnerable-api/index.ts (2 hunks)
- app/utils/parse-vulnerable-api-finding.ts (4 hunks)
- tests/integration/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/index-test.js (3 hunks)
- tests/unit/utils/parse-vulnerable-api-finding-test.js (4 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/findings/vulnerable-api/index.ts
- app/utils/parse-vulnerable-api-finding.ts
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (7)
app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/findings/vulnerable-api/index.hbs (2)
25-45: LGTM: CVSS score section implemented correctlyThe new CVSS score section is well-implemented. It follows the existing pattern in the file, uses appropriate components for layout and styling, and includes data-test attributes for testing. The use of translations for labels is good for internationalization.
84-110: LGTM: Vulnerability details section improvementsThe modifications to the vulnerability details section are good:
- Removing the empty check simplifies the code without changing functionality.
- The
markedAsPassedproperty is now correctly bound to@analysis.isOverriddenAsPassed, addressing the issue mentioned in the past review comments.These changes improve code clarity and correctness.
tests/unit/utils/parse-vulnerable-api-finding-test.js (2)
78-79: LGTM: Addition of CVSS fields to existing test casesThe addition of
cvssMetricsandcvssScorefields withnullvalues to the existing test cases is appropriate. This change ensures compatibility with the updatedparseVulnerableApiFindingfunction while maintaining the integrity of the original test cases.Also applies to: 108-109, 173-174, 228-229
286-286: LGTM: New test case added to vulnerableApiFindings arrayThe addition of the new test case (content4 and expectedObject4) to the vulnerableApiFindings array ensures that it will be included in the parameterized tests. This change is consistent with the structure of the existing test cases and enhances the overall test coverage.
tests/integration/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/index-test.js (3)
40-41: New constantreqResFormatVulnerability3looks goodThe new constant follows the existing pattern and includes relevant CVSS metrics information, which is appropriate for the new test case.
683-776: Updates to existing test case improve coverageThe modifications to the "it renders analysis details with vulnerable api findings" test case appropriately account for the new CVSS metrics functionality. The addition of pagination testing enhances the overall test coverage.
Line range hint
1-904: Overall, the changes enhance test coverage for CVSS metricsThe additions and modifications in this file successfully integrate testing for the new CVSS metrics functionality. The new constant and test case are well-structured and consistent with existing patterns. The updates to existing tests ensure continued coverage of previous functionality while accommodating the new features.
Great job on maintaining test quality while expanding coverage!
|
Closing this as these changes are not needed for now |
No description provided.